ChatGLM-RLHF: Practices of Aligning Large Language Models with Human Feedback
2404.00934
0
0
💬
Abstract
ChatGLM is a free-to-use AI service powered by the ChatGLM family of large language models (LLMs). In this paper, we present the ChatGLM-RLHF pipeline -- a reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) system -- designed to enhance ChatGLM's alignment with human preferences. ChatGLM-RLHF encompasses three major components: the collection of human preference data, the training of the reward model, and the optimization of policies. Throughout the process of integrating ChatGLM-RLHF into production, we encountered and addressed several unprecedented challenges. We introduce the strategies to mitigate reward variance for stabilized large-scale training, implement model parallelism with fused gradient-descent, and design regularization constraints to avoid catastrophic forgetting in LLMs. Experiments show that ChatGLM-RLHF brings significant improvements in alignment tasks compared to the supervised fine-tuned (SFT) version of ChatGLM. For instance, it achieves on average 15% more wins against ChatGLM-SFT in Chinese alignment tasks. The work presents our practices of aligning LLMs with human preferences, offering insights into the challenges and solutions in RLHF implementations.
Get summaries of the top AI research delivered straight to your inbox:
Overview
- The paper proposes ChatGLM-RLHF, a method for aligning large language models with human feedback.
- It explores techniques to train language models to be more aligned with human preferences and values.
- The approach uses Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) to fine-tune a large language model called ChatGLM.
Plain English Explanation
This research aims to create language models that better reflect human values and preferences. Large language models like ChatGPT are incredibly capable, but they can sometimes produce outputs that don't align with what humans consider desirable or ethical.
The key idea is to use a process called Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) to fine-tune the language model. In RLHF, humans provide feedback on the model's outputs, and the model is trained to generate responses that the humans prefer. Over time, this shapes the model to produce language that is more in line with human values.
The researchers applied this RLHF approach to a model called ChatGLM, resulting in a version called ChatGLM-RLHF that is more aligned with human preferences. This could help address concerns about language models behaving in undesirable ways and make them more trustworthy and beneficial for real-world applications.
Technical Explanation
The core of the approach is to use Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) to fine-tune a large language model called ChatGLM. ChatGLM is a pre-trained model that can generate human-like text. The researchers first collect human feedback on the outputs of ChatGLM, rating them on criteria like coherence, correctness, and alignment with human values.
They then use this feedback data to train a reward model, which learns to predict how much humans will like the model's outputs. This reward model is used to provide rewards during reinforcement learning, where the language model is trained to generate text that maximizes the reward. Over many iterations, this shapes the model to produce outputs that are more aligned with human preferences.
The researchers evaluate the resulting ChatGLM-RLHF model on a variety of tasks, including open-ended conversation, question answering, and task completion. They find that ChatGLM-RLHF outperforms the original ChatGLM on measures of coherence, factual accuracy, and value alignment, demonstrating the effectiveness of the RLHF approach.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough explanation of the RLHF technique and its application to the ChatGLM model. One potential limitation is that the evaluation is primarily focused on task-completion and output quality, rather than deeper assessments of value alignment. The authors acknowledge that further work is needed to better understand the model's behavior in more complex, open-ended scenarios.
Additionally, the paper does not address potential issues around the subjectivity of human feedback and the challenge of defining universal "human values." The training process could inadvertently encode the biases and preferences of the specific individuals providing feedback, rather than truly aligning the model with broader societal values.
More research is needed to understand the long-term implications of this type of value alignment approach, especially as language models become more powerful and influential. Careful consideration should be given to the ethical frameworks and oversight mechanisms required to ensure these models are developed and deployed responsibly.
Conclusion
The ChatGLM-RLHF research represents an important step towards aligning large language models with human preferences and values. By using Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback, the authors have shown how it is possible to fine-tune a powerful language model to generate outputs that are more coherent, accurate, and aligned with what humans consider desirable.
This work has significant implications for the development of trustworthy and beneficial AI systems, as it addresses a key challenge in ensuring language models behave in ways that are consistent with human values. However, further research is needed to fully understand the limitations and potential pitfalls of this approach, as well as to explore alternative methods for value alignment. Continued collaboration between researchers, policymakers, and the public will be crucial to ensuring these technologies are developed responsibly and in service of the common good.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
The Real, the Better: Aligning Large Language Models with Online Human Behaviors
Guanying Jiang, Lingyong Yan, Haibo Shi, Dawei Yin
0
0
Large language model alignment is widely used and studied to avoid LLM producing unhelpful and harmful responses. However, the lengthy training process and predefined preference bias hinder adaptation to online diverse human preferences. To this end, this paper proposes an alignment framework, called Reinforcement Learning with Human Behavior (RLHB), to align LLMs by directly leveraging real online human behaviors. By taking the generative adversarial framework, the generator is trained to respond following expected human behavior; while the discriminator tries to verify whether the triplets of query, response, and human behavior come from real online environments. Behavior modeling in natural-language form and the multi-model joint training mechanism enable an active and sustainable online alignment. Experimental results confirm the effectiveness of our proposed methods by both human and automatic evaluations.
5/2/2024
💬
Privately Aligning Language Models with Reinforcement Learning
Fan Wu, Huseyin A. Inan, Arturs Backurs, Varun Chandrasekaran, Janardhan Kulkarni, Robert Sim
0
0
Positioned between pre-training and user deployment, aligning large language models (LLMs) through reinforcement learning (RL) has emerged as a prevailing strategy for training instruction following-models such as ChatGPT. In this work, we initiate the study of privacy-preserving alignment of LLMs through Differential Privacy (DP) in conjunction with RL. Following the influential work of Ziegler et al. (2020), we study two dominant paradigms: (i) alignment via RL without human in the loop (e.g., positive review generation) and (ii) alignment via RL from human feedback (RLHF) (e.g., summarization in a human-preferred way). We give a new DP framework to achieve alignment via RL, and prove its correctness. Our experimental results validate the effectiveness of our approach, offering competitive utility while ensuring strong privacy protections.
5/6/2024
RLHF Deciphered: A Critical Analysis of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback for LLMs
Shreyas Chaudhari, Pranjal Aggarwal, Vishvak Murahari, Tanmay Rajpurohit, Ashwin Kalyan, Karthik Narasimhan, Ameet Deshpande, Bruno Castro da Silva
0
0
State-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) have become indispensable tools for various tasks. However, training LLMs to serve as effective assistants for humans requires careful consideration. A promising approach is reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), which leverages human feedback to update the model in accordance with human preferences and mitigate issues like toxicity and hallucinations. Yet, an understanding of RLHF for LLMs is largely entangled with initial design choices that popularized the method and current research focuses on augmenting those choices rather than fundamentally improving the framework. In this paper, we analyze RLHF through the lens of reinforcement learning principles to develop an understanding of its fundamentals, dedicating substantial focus to the core component of RLHF -- the reward model. Our study investigates modeling choices, caveats of function approximation, and their implications on RLHF training algorithms, highlighting the underlying assumptions made about the expressivity of reward. Our analysis improves the understanding of the role of reward models and methods for their training, concurrently revealing limitations of the current methodology. We characterize these limitations, including incorrect generalization, model misspecification, and the sparsity of feedback, along with their impact on the performance of a language model. The discussion and analysis are substantiated by a categorical review of current literature, serving as a reference for researchers and practitioners to understand the challenges of RLHF and build upon existing efforts.
4/17/2024
🧠
RLHF Workflow: From Reward Modeling to Online RLHF
Hanze Dong, Wei Xiong, Bo Pang, Haoxiang Wang, Han Zhao, Yingbo Zhou, Nan Jiang, Doyen Sahoo, Caiming Xiong, Tong Zhang
0
0
We present the workflow of Online Iterative Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) in this technical report, which is widely reported to outperform its offline counterpart by a large margin in the recent large language model (LLM) literature. However, existing open-source RLHF projects are still largely confined to the offline learning setting. In this technical report, we aim to fill in this gap and provide a detailed recipe that is easy to reproduce for online iterative RLHF. In particular, since online human feedback is usually infeasible for open-source communities with limited resources, we start by constructing preference models using a diverse set of open-source datasets and use the constructed proxy preference model to approximate human feedback. Then, we discuss the theoretical insights and algorithmic principles behind online iterative RLHF, followed by a detailed practical implementation. Our trained LLM, SFR-Iterative-DPO-LLaMA-3-8B-R, achieves impressive performance on LLM chatbot benchmarks, including AlpacaEval-2, Arena-Hard, and MT-Bench, as well as other academic benchmarks such as HumanEval and TruthfulQA. We have shown that supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and iterative RLHF can obtain state-of-the-art performance with fully open-source datasets. Further, we have made our models, curated datasets, and comprehensive step-by-step code guidebooks publicly available. Please refer to https://github.com/RLHFlow/RLHF-Reward-Modeling and https://github.com/RLHFlow/Online-RLHF for more detailed information.
5/14/2024