Class-Imbalanced Graph Learning without Class Rebalancing

Overview

• Class imbalance is a common challenge in real-world node classification tasks on graphs.
• Existing studies often address class imbalance through class rebalancing (CR) techniques like reweighting or resampling.
• This paper takes a different approach, looking at the root cause of class imbalance bias from a topological perspective.

Plain English Explanation

In the real world, when we try to classify nodes in a graph (like classifying users on a social network), the number of examples for each class is often very unbalanced. For example, there may be many more posts about technology than about sports.

Most existing methods try to fix this by adjusting the weights or number of examples for each class to make them more balanced. But this paper argues that the root cause of the problem is actually in the structure or topology of the graph itself.

The researchers found two key properties of graph topology that make class imbalance much worse:

1. Well-connected nodes (nodes with many neighbors) tend to belong to the majority class
2. The majority class is often more clustered together, forming dense regions in the graph

Based on these insights, the researchers developed a new framework called BAT that can mitigate the class imbalance bias without needing to rebalance the classes. BAT works by strategically adding or removing some connections in the graph to counteract these topological biases.

This approach is different from and can be combined with existing class rebalancing techniques to get even better results. Experiments show that BAT can boost performance by up to 46% and reduce bias by up to 73% on real-world imbalanced graph learning tasks.

Technical Explanation

The key insight of this paper is that class imbalance bias in graph learning is fundamentally rooted in the graph's topology, rather than just the distribution of class labels. The authors identify two main topological phenomena that exacerbate class imbalance bias:

1. Well-connected nodes tend to belong to majority class: Nodes with many neighbors are more likely to be classified as the majority class, as the model leverages the information from their many connections.

2. Majority class is more clustered: The majority class often forms denser, more cohesive regions in the graph topology, making it easier for the model to accurately classify majority class examples.

Based on these observations, the authors propose a Topological Augmentation framework called BAT (Bias-Aware Topological augmentation) that mitigates class imbalance bias without requiring any class rebalancing. BAT works by strategically adding or removing edges in the graph to counteract the topological biases.

Specifically, BAT consists of two main components:

1. Bias-Aware Sampling: BAT samples edge additions/deletions that are most effective at reducing class imbalance bias.
2. Topological Augmentation: BAT applies the sampled edge changes to the original graph, creating an augmented graph that is then fed to the graph learning model.

The authors show that BAT is complementary to class rebalancing techniques and can be seamlessly combined with them to achieve further performance gains. Extensive experiments on real-world imbalanced graph learning tasks demonstrate that BAT can deliver up to 46.27% performance improvement and up to 72.74% bias reduction compared to existing methods.

Critical Analysis

The key strength of this paper is its novel perspective on addressing class imbalance in graph learning. Rather than focusing solely on class rebalancing, the authors identify fundamental topological biases that exacerbate the problem. This opens up a new direction for research beyond just adjusting the class distributions.

However, the paper does not deeply explore the limitations of the proposed BAT framework. For example, it's unclear how sensitive BAT is to the specific graph structure or the severity of the class imbalance. Additionally, the computational overhead of the topological augmentation process is not thoroughly analyzed.

Furthermore, the comparison to other state-of-the-art methods is limited, and the authors do not discuss potential negative societal impacts of their approach, such as unintended biases introduced by the topological modifications.

Overall, this is an interesting and impactful piece of research that introduces a new angle on the class imbalance problem in graph learning. But there is still room for further exploration and refinement of the proposed techniques to address the potential limitations.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel topological perspective on addressing class imbalance in graph learning tasks. By identifying two key phenomena in graph topology that exacerbate class imbalance bias, the authors develop a lightweight topological augmentation framework called BAT that can significantly improve model performance and reduce bias without requiring class rebalancing.

The experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the BAT approach, which can be seamlessly combined with existing class rebalancing techniques. This work opens up new avenues for research on tackling class imbalance in real-world graph learning applications, beyond just adjusting the class distributions.

Future work could explore the robustness and generalizability of the BAT framework, as well as its potential societal implications. Nonetheless, this paper makes an important contribution to the field of graph learning by approaching the class imbalance challenge from a fresh, topological angle.