Sharp error bounds for imbalanced classification: how many examples in the minority class?

Read original: arXiv:2310.14826 - Published 4/17/2024 by Anass Aghbalou, Franc{c}ois Portier, Anne Sabourin
Total Score

0

🎲

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper addresses a key challenge in imbalanced classification data: the negligible size of one class compared to the full sample size.
  • The authors present two novel contributions to address this challenge:
    1. A non-asymptotic fast rate probability bound for constrained balanced empirical risk minimization.
    2. A consistent upper bound for balanced nearest neighbors estimates.

Plain English Explanation

When you have a dataset with an imbalance between the different classes (e.g., a rare disease affecting only a small percentage of the population), standard machine learning models can struggle to perform well. To address this, researchers often reweight the loss function to balance the importance of correctly identifying the rare and common classes.

However, the authors of this paper identify a specific challenge that previous work has not adequately addressed: when the rare class is

extremely
small compared to the overall dataset, the probability of that class tends towards zero. This makes it difficult to properly rescale the risk function.

To solve this problem, the authors propose two new techniques:

  1. A non-asymptotic fast rate probability bound for constrained balanced empirical risk minimization: This provides a mathematical guarantee on the performance of machine learning models that have been trained to balance the rare and common classes, even when the rare class is very small.
  2. A consistent upper bound for balanced nearest neighbors estimates: This gives a way to reliably estimate the performance of a simple machine learning model (k-nearest neighbors) on imbalanced data, again even when one class is negligibly small.

These contributions help us better understand the benefits of class-weighting techniques in realistic settings with extreme imbalances. This opens up new avenues for further research in this important area of machine learning.

Technical Explanation

The paper's key contributions are:

  1. Non-asymptotic fast rate probability bound for constrained balanced empirical risk minimization: The authors derive a theoretical guarantee on the performance of machine learning models trained using a constrained balanced empirical risk minimization approach. This means the model is optimized to balance the errors on the rare and common classes, even when the rare class probability tends to zero as the dataset size increases. They prove a fast rate probability bound, which provides stronger guarantees than typical asymptotic results.

  2. Consistent upper bound for balanced nearest neighbors estimates: The authors also develop a way to reliably estimate the performance of k-nearest neighbors (kNN) classifiers on imbalanced data. Specifically, they derive a consistent upper bound on the balanced error rate of kNN, which is a simple but effective model for many real-world applications. This bound holds even when the rare class probability goes to zero.

The key technical insights behind these contributions involve carefully analyzing the inherent trade-offs in imbalanced classification, where optimizing for overall accuracy can lead to poor performance on the rare class. The authors show how to overcome this challenge by incorporating class-weighting directly into the theoretical analysis.

Critical Analysis

The authors acknowledge several limitations and areas for future work:

  • The theoretical results are non-asymptotic, meaning they hold for finite dataset sizes. Extending these to truly asymptotic regimes remains an open challenge.
  • The authors focus on binary classification, and extending the techniques to the multiclass setting may require additional considerations.
  • While the kNN results are promising, other more complex models like bagged ensembles may exhibit different behavior in extreme imbalance scenarios.
  • The paper does not provide empirical validation of the proposed techniques on real-world datasets, which would help solidify the practical relevance of the findings.

Overall, this work makes an important theoretical contribution to understanding the challenges of imbalanced classification, especially in regimes where one class is negligibly small. The new bounds and estimates provide a clearer mathematical foundation for designing effective machine learning models in such settings. However, further research is needed to fully translate these insights into robust, high-performing imbalanced classification systems.

Conclusion

This paper tackles a critical challenge in imbalanced classification: when one class is extremely rare compared to the overall dataset size. The authors present two novel theoretical contributions to address this issue:

  1. A non-asymptotic fast rate probability bound for constrained balanced empirical risk minimization, which provides strong performance guarantees for models trained to balance errors on rare and common classes.
  2. A consistent upper bound for balanced nearest neighbors estimates, allowing reliable evaluation of simple kNN classifiers even in extreme imbalance scenarios.

These results help us better understand the benefits of class-weighting techniques and open up new avenues for further research in this important area of machine learning. As datasets continue to grow and real-world applications demand robust performance on rare classes, advances like those presented in this paper will be increasingly valuable.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🎲

Total Score

0

Sharp error bounds for imbalanced classification: how many examples in the minority class?

Anass Aghbalou, Franc{c}ois Portier, Anne Sabourin

When dealing with imbalanced classification data, reweighting the loss function is a standard procedure allowing to equilibrate between the true positive and true negative rates within the risk measure. Despite significant theoretical work in this area, existing results do not adequately address a main challenge within the imbalanced classification framework, which is the negligible size of one class in relation to the full sample size and the need to rescale the risk function by a probability tending to zero. To address this gap, we present two novel contributions in the setting where the rare class probability approaches zero: (1) a non asymptotic fast rate probability bound for constrained balanced empirical risk minimization, and (2) a consistent upper bound for balanced nearest neighbors estimates. Our findings provide a clearer understanding of the benefits of class-weighting in realistic settings, opening new avenues for further research in this field.

Read more

4/17/2024

🚀

Total Score

0

Robust performance metrics for imbalanced classification problems

Hajo Holzmann, Bernhard Klar

We show that established performance metrics in binary classification, such as the F-score, the Jaccard similarity coefficient or Matthews' correlation coefficient (MCC), are not robust to class imbalance in the sense that if the proportion of the minority class tends to $0$, the true positive rate (TPR) of the Bayes classifier under these metrics tends to $0$ as well. Thus, in imbalanced classification problems, these metrics favour classifiers which ignore the minority class. To alleviate this issue we introduce robust modifications of the F-score and the MCC for which, even in strongly imbalanced settings, the TPR is bounded away from $0$. We numerically illustrate the behaviour of the various performance metrics in simulations as well as on a credit default data set. We also discuss connections to the ROC and precision-recall curves and give recommendations on how to combine their usage with performance metrics.

Read more

4/12/2024

Learning Confidence Bounds for Classification with Imbalanced Data
Total Score

0

Learning Confidence Bounds for Classification with Imbalanced Data

Matt Clifford, Jonathan Erskine, Alexander Hepburn, Ra'ul Santos-Rodr'iguez, Dario Garcia-Garcia

Class imbalance poses a significant challenge in classification tasks, where traditional approaches often lead to biased models and unreliable predictions. Undersampling and oversampling techniques have been commonly employed to address this issue, yet they suffer from inherent limitations stemming from their simplistic approach such as loss of information and additional biases respectively. In this paper, we propose a novel framework that leverages learning theory and concentration inequalities to overcome the shortcomings of traditional solutions. We focus on understanding the uncertainty in a class-dependent manner, as captured by confidence bounds that we directly embed into the learning process. By incorporating class-dependent estimates, our method can effectively adapt to the varying degrees of imbalance across different classes, resulting in more robust and reliable classification outcomes. We empirically show how our framework provides a promising direction for handling imbalanced data in classification tasks, offering practitioners a valuable tool for building more accurate and trustworthy models.

Read more

7/17/2024

When resampling/reweighting improves feature learning in imbalanced classification?: A toy-model study
Total Score

0

When resampling/reweighting improves feature learning in imbalanced classification?: A toy-model study

Tomoyuki Obuchi, Toshiyuki Tanaka

A toy model of binary classification is studied with the aim of clarifying the class-wise resampling/reweighting effect on the feature learning performance under the presence of class imbalance. In the analysis, a high-dimensional limit of the feature is taken while keeping the dataset size ratio against the feature dimension finite and the non-rigorous replica method from statistical mechanics is employed. The result shows that there exists a case in which the no resampling/reweighting situation gives the best feature learning performance irrespectively of the choice of losses or classifiers, supporting recent findings in Cao et al. (2019); Kang et al. (2019). It is also revealed that the key of the result is the symmetry of the loss and the problem setting. Inspired by this, we propose a further simplified model exhibiting the same property for the multiclass setting. These clarify when the class-wise resampling/reweighting becomes effective in imbalanced classification.

Read more

9/10/2024