CLEAN-EVAL: Clean Evaluation on Contaminated Large Language Models

Overview

• The paper proposes a novel method called Clean-Eval to address the issue of data contamination when evaluating the capabilities of large language models (LLMs).
• Data contamination can skew the evaluation results and waste researchers' and engineers' time, as they may download and test contaminated models.
• Clean-Eval uses an LLM to paraphrase and back-translate the contaminated data, generating expressions with the same meaning but different surface forms.
• A semantic detector is then used to filter out low-quality samples, and the best candidate is selected based on the BLEURT score.
• The experiments show that Clean-Eval can substantially restore the actual evaluation results on contaminated LLMs under both few-shot learning and fine-tuning scenarios.

Plain English Explanation

Large language models (LLMs) are powerful AI systems that can handle a wide range of tasks, from generating human-like text to answering questions. However, evaluating the true capabilities of these LLMs has become a significant challenge due to the issue of data contamination.

Data contamination occurs when the training data used to develop an LLM contains information that the model can simply memorize and regurgitate, rather than demonstrating genuine understanding or reasoning. This can lead to inflated performance scores that don't accurately reflect the model's true capabilities.

To address this problem, the researchers developed a method called Clean-Eval. Clean-Eval works by using an LLM to paraphrase and back-translate the contaminated data, generating a set of candidate expressions with the same meaning but different surface forms. A semantic detector is then used to filter out low-quality samples, and the best candidate is selected based on a more reliable metric, the BLEURT score.

By using this process, the researchers were able to substantially restore the actual evaluation results on contaminated LLMs, both in few-shot learning and fine-tuning scenarios. This is a significant advancement, as it helps researchers and engineers focus their efforts on truly capable models rather than wasting time on contaminated ones.

Technical Explanation

The researchers propose a novel method called Clean-Eval to address the issue of data contamination when evaluating the capabilities of large language models (LLMs). Data contamination can occur when the training data used to develop an LLM contains information that the model can simply memorize and regurgitate, rather than demonstrating genuine understanding or reasoning. This can lead to inflated performance scores that do not accurately reflect the model's true capabilities.

Clean-Eval works by using an LLM to paraphrase and back-translate the contaminated data, generating a candidate set of expressions with the same meaning but different surface forms. A semantic detector is then employed to filter out low-quality samples from this candidate set. Finally, the best candidate is selected based on the BLEURT score, a more reliable metric for evaluating semantic similarity.

The researchers conducted experiments to evaluate the effectiveness of Clean-Eval under both few-shot learning and fine-tuning scenarios. The results show that Clean-Eval can substantially restore the actual evaluation results on contaminated LLMs, demonstrating its ability to mitigate the issue of data contamination.

Critical Analysis

The researchers have proposed a promising solution to the challenging problem of data contamination in LLM evaluation. By using an LLM to generate a diverse set of candidate expressions and then filtering them based on semantic quality, Clean-Eval appears to be an effective way to obtain a more accurate assessment of an LLM's true capabilities.

However, the paper does not provide a comprehensive analysis of the limitations and potential issues with the Clean-Eval approach. For example, the performance of the semantic detector used to filter the candidate set is critical, and the paper does not discuss how the detector was trained or evaluated. Additionally, the reliance on the BLEURT score as the final arbiter of quality may be susceptible to its own biases or shortcomings.

Further research is needed to explore the robustness of Clean-Eval and to understand its limitations, particularly in the context of more diverse and complex evaluation tasks. Additionally, the development of more advanced techniques for [FreeEval] trustworthy and efficient evaluation of large language models could complement or build upon the Clean-Eval approach.

Conclusion

The Clean-Eval method proposed in this paper represents an important step forward in addressing the critical issue of data contamination in the evaluation of large language models. By using an LLM to generate diverse candidate expressions and then filtering them based on semantic quality, the researchers have demonstrated a way to obtain more accurate assessments of an LLM's true capabilities.

This work has significant implications for the field of AI, as it can help researchers and engineers focus their efforts on genuinely capable models rather than wasting time on contaminated ones. As the competition among LLMs continues to intensify, the need for reliable and trustworthy evaluation methods will only become more pressing, and the Clean-Eval approach offers a promising solution to this challenge.