Clean Label Attacks against SLU Systems
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Clean label attacks against spoken language understanding (SLU) systems are a type of adversarial attack where the attacker modifies input data in a way that is indistinguishable from normal data.
- These attacks can cause SLU systems to misclassify the input, potentially leading to serious real-world consequences.
- The paper explores the threat of clean label attacks against SLU systems and proposes defense strategies to mitigate this vulnerability.
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses a concerning type of attack against spoken language understanding (SLU) systems, known as "clean label attacks." In these attacks, the attacker makes subtle changes to input data that are virtually undetectable to human observers, but can trick the SLU system into misclassifying the input.
For example, an attacker might modify a voice command like "play my favorite song" in a way that makes the SLU system interpret it as "delete all my files." This type of attack could have serious real-world consequences, such as accidentally deleting important data.
The researchers explore the threat model and potential impacts of these clean label attacks against SLU systems. They also propose defense strategies that SLU system developers can use to make their models more robust and resistant to these types of adversarial attacks.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by outlining the threat model for clean label attacks against SLU systems. The key aspects of the threat model include:
- Dataset: The attacker has access to the training data used to develop the SLU model, which they can use to craft adversarial examples.
- Attack Goal: The attacker aims to cause the SLU model to misclassify the input in a targeted way, without making the input appear anomalous to human observers.
- Attack Constraints: The attacker must modify the input in a way that preserves the "clean label" appearance, and the modifications must be imperceptible to human listeners.
The paper then presents several attack strategies the attacker can use to craft clean label adversarial examples, such as:
- Adversarial Example Generation: Using gradient-based optimization techniques to find minimal perturbations that cause the desired misclassification.
- Targeted Backdoor Attacks: Injecting a hidden trigger into the training data that causes the model to misclassify specific inputs.
The researchers evaluated the effectiveness of these clean label attack strategies on several real-world SLU datasets, demonstrating their ability to achieve high attack success rates while preserving the clean appearance of the modified inputs.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive and well-designed exploration of the threat of clean label attacks against SLU systems. The researchers have clearly identified a significant vulnerability that could have serious real-world consequences if exploited by malicious actors.
One potential limitation of the research is that it focuses primarily on the technical feasibility of the attacks, without delving deeply into the broader implications or societal impacts. For example, the paper does not discuss the ethical considerations or potential misuses of these attack techniques.
Additionally, the proposed defense strategies, while promising, may not be fully effective in the long run. Adversarial attacks are an active area of research, and attackers are likely to develop increasingly sophisticated techniques to circumvent any defenses. Ongoing research and vigilance will be required to stay ahead of these evolving threats.
Conclusion
This paper makes an important contribution to the field of adversarial machine learning by shining a light on the vulnerability of SLU systems to clean label attacks. The researchers have demonstrated the feasibility of these attacks and proposed some initial defense strategies, but there is still much work to be done to address this growing threat.
As SLU systems become increasingly ubiquitous in our daily lives, it is critical that researchers, developers, and policymakers work together to develop robust and secure solutions that can withstand these types of adversarial attacks. The findings of this paper should serve as a wake-up call and a call to action for the broader AI research community.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
New!Clean Label Attacks against SLU Systems
Henry Li Xinyuan, Sonal Joshi, Thomas Thebaud, Jesus Villalba, Najim Dehak, Sanjeev Khudanpur
Poisoning backdoor attacks involve an adversary manipulating the training data to induce certain behaviors in the victim model by inserting a trigger in the signal at inference time. We adapted clean label backdoor (CLBD)-data poisoning attacks, which do not modify the training labels, on state-of-the-art speech recognition models that support/perform a Spoken Language Understanding task, achieving 99.8% attack success rate by poisoning 10% of the training data. We analyzed how varying the signal-strength of the poison, percent of samples poisoned, and choice of trigger impact the attack. We also found that CLBD attacks are most successful when applied to training samples that are inherently hard for a proxy model. Using this strategy, we achieved an attack success rate of 99.3% by poisoning a meager 1.5% of the training data. Finally, we applied two previously developed defenses against gradient-based attacks, and found that they attain mixed success against poisoning.
Read more9/16/2024
0
Wicked Oddities: Selectively Poisoning for Effective Clean-Label Backdoor Attacks
Quang H. Nguyen, Nguyen Ngoc-Hieu, The-Anh Ta, Thanh Nguyen-Tang, Kok-Seng Wong, Hoang Thanh-Tung, Khoa D. Doan
Deep neural networks are vulnerable to backdoor attacks, a type of adversarial attack that poisons the training data to manipulate the behavior of models trained on such data. Clean-label attacks are a more stealthy form of backdoor attacks that can perform the attack without changing the labels of poisoned data. Early works on clean-label attacks added triggers to a random subset of the training set, ignoring the fact that samples contribute unequally to the attack's success. This results in high poisoning rates and low attack success rates. To alleviate the problem, several supervised learning-based sample selection strategies have been proposed. However, these methods assume access to the entire labeled training set and require training, which is expensive and may not always be practical. This work studies a new and more practical (but also more challenging) threat model where the attacker only provides data for the target class (e.g., in face recognition systems) and has no knowledge of the victim model or any other classes in the training set. We study different strategies for selectively poisoning a small set of training samples in the target class to boost the attack success rate in this setting. Our threat model poses a serious threat in training machine learning models with third-party datasets, since the attack can be performed effectively with limited information. Experiments on benchmark datasets illustrate the effectiveness of our strategies in improving clean-label backdoor attacks.
Read more7/17/2024
0
A Backdoor Approach with Inverted Labels Using Dirty Label-Flipping Attacks
Orson Mengara
Audio-based machine learning systems frequently use public or third-party data, which might be inaccurate. This exposes deep neural network (DNN) models trained on such data to potential data poisoning attacks. In this type of assault, attackers can train the DNN model using poisoned data, potentially degrading its performance. Another type of data poisoning attack that is extremely relevant to our investigation is label flipping, in which the attacker manipulates the labels for a subset of data. It has been demonstrated that these assaults may drastically reduce system performance, even for attackers with minimal abilities. In this study, we propose a backdoor attack named 'DirtyFlipping', which uses dirty label techniques, label-on-label, to input triggers (clapping) in the selected data patterns associated with the target class, thereby enabling a stealthy backdoor.
Read more4/9/2024
0
Model-agnostic clean-label backdoor mitigation in cybersecurity environments
Giorgio Severi, Simona Boboila, John Holodnak, Kendra Kratkiewicz, Rauf Izmailov, Alina Oprea
The training phase of machine learning models is a delicate step, especially in cybersecurity contexts. Recent research has surfaced a series of insidious training-time attacks that inject backdoors in models designed for security classification tasks without altering the training labels. With this work, we propose new techniques that leverage insights in cybersecurity threat models to effectively mitigate these clean-label poisoning attacks, while preserving the model utility. By performing density-based clustering on a carefully chosen feature subspace, and progressively isolating the suspicious clusters through a novel iterative scoring procedure, our defensive mechanism can mitigate the attacks without requiring many of the common assumptions in the existing backdoor defense literature. To show the generality of our proposed mitigation, we evaluate it on two clean-label model-agnostic attacks on two different classic cybersecurity data modalities: network flows classification and malware classification, using gradient boosting and neural network models.
Read more7/12/2024