Clinical Reasoning over Tabular Data and Text with Bayesian Networks
2403.09481
0
0
Abstract
Bayesian networks are well-suited for clinical reasoning on tabular data, but are less compatible with natural language data, for which neural networks provide a successful framework. This paper compares and discusses strategies to augment Bayesian networks with neural text representations, both in a generative and discriminative manner. This is illustrated with simulation results for a primary care use case (diagnosis of pneumonia) and discussed in a broader clinical context.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the use of Bayesian networks for clinical reasoning over tabular data and text.
- The researchers developed a model that combines Bayesian networks with neural networks to leverage both structured and unstructured data for clinical decision-making.
- The model was evaluated on a use case involving the diagnosis and treatment of chronic kidney disease, demonstrating its potential to improve clinical reasoning and decision-making.
Plain English Explanation
The paper describes a new approach to clinical decision-making that combines two powerful machine learning techniques: Bayesian networks and neural networks. Bayesian networks are a type of probabilistic model that can capture the relationships between different medical factors, while neural networks are well-suited for processing and understanding unstructured data, such as clinical notes and reports.
The researchers developed a model that integrates these two approaches, allowing it to reason about both the structured data (like lab results and patient characteristics) and the unstructured data (like the text in medical records) to make more informed clinical decisions. They tested this model on a real-world problem: diagnosing and treating chronic kidney disease.
By leveraging both types of data, the model was able to provide more accurate and comprehensive clinical recommendations than approaches that rely on just one type of data. This could be particularly useful in healthcare settings, where clinicians often need to consider a wide range of information to make the best decisions for their patients.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a Bayesian network-based approach for clinical reasoning over tabular data and unstructured text. The researchers developed a model that combines Bayesian networks with neural networks to leverage both structured and unstructured data sources for clinical decision-making.
The Bayesian network component of the model captures the probabilistic relationships between different medical factors, such as symptoms, lab results, and diagnoses. This allows the model to reason about the likelihood of different clinical outcomes based on the available data.
The neural network component, on the other hand, is responsible for processing and extracting meaningful information from the unstructured text data, such as clinical notes and reports. This includes identifying relevant entities, extracting relevant features, and encoding the text in a way that can be effectively integrated into the Bayesian network.
The researchers evaluated their model on a use case involving the diagnosis and treatment of chronic kidney disease. They used a dataset that included both structured data (e.g., patient demographics, lab results) and unstructured data (e.g., clinical notes). The results of their experiments showed that the combined Bayesian network and neural network model outperformed approaches that relied on either structured or unstructured data alone, demonstrating the value of integrating these two complementary techniques.
Critical Analysis
The researchers acknowledge several limitations of their work, including the relatively small size of the dataset used for evaluation and the potential for bias in the data. They also note that the performance of the model may vary depending on the specific clinical domain and the availability and quality of the data.
One potential concern is the interpretability of the model's decision-making process. While Bayesian networks can provide some level of transparency in their reasoning, the integration with neural networks may make the overall model less interpretable, which could be a barrier to its adoption in clinical settings.
Additionally, the researchers do not address the potential ethical considerations and challenges associated with the use of AI systems in healthcare, such as the need for robust privacy protections, the potential for algorithmic bias, and the importance of maintaining human oversight and control over critical medical decisions.
Despite these limitations, the research presented in this paper represents an important step forward in the application of advanced machine learning techniques to the domain of clinical decision-making. The integration of Bayesian networks and neural networks for reasoning over both structured and unstructured data is a promising approach that could lead to significant improvements in the quality and accuracy of clinical decisions.
Conclusion
This paper demonstrates the potential of combining Bayesian networks and neural networks for clinical reasoning over tabular data and text. By leveraging both structured and unstructured data sources, the researchers developed a model that can provide more comprehensive and accurate clinical recommendations compared to approaches that rely on a single data type.
The successful application of this approach to the diagnosis and treatment of chronic kidney disease suggests that it could be a valuable tool for improving clinical decision-making in a variety of healthcare settings. As the field of AI-powered clinical reasoning continues to evolve, approaches like the one presented in this paper may play an increasingly important role in helping clinicians provide more personalized and effective care for their patients.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Large Language Models are Clinical Reasoners: Reasoning-Aware Diagnosis Framework with Prompt-Generated Rationales
Taeyoon Kwon, Kai Tzu-iunn Ong, Dongjin Kang, Seungjun Moon, Jeong Ryong Lee, Dosik Hwang, Yongsik Sim, Beomseok Sohn, Dongha Lee, Jinyoung Yeo
0
0
Machine reasoning has made great progress in recent years owing to large language models (LLMs). In the clinical domain, however, most NLP-driven projects mainly focus on clinical classification or reading comprehension, and under-explore clinical reasoning for disease diagnosis due to the expensive rationale annotation with clinicians. In this work, we present a reasoning-aware diagnosis framework that rationalizes the diagnostic process via prompt-based learning in a time- and labor-efficient manner, and learns to reason over the prompt-generated rationales. Specifically, we address the clinical reasoning for disease diagnosis, where the LLM generates diagnostic rationales providing its insight on presented patient data and the reasoning path towards the diagnosis, namely Clinical Chain-of-Thought (Clinical CoT). We empirically demonstrate LLMs/LMs' ability of clinical reasoning via extensive experiments and analyses on both rationale generation and disease diagnosis in various settings. We further propose a novel set of criteria for evaluating machine-generated rationales' potential for real-world clinical settings, facilitating and benefiting future research in this area.
5/13/2024
💬
Guiding Clinical Reasoning with Large Language Models via Knowledge Seeds
Jiageng WU, Xian Wu, Jie Yang
0
0
Clinical reasoning refers to the cognitive process that physicians employ in evaluating and managing patients. This process typically involves suggesting necessary examinations, diagnosing patients' diseases, and deciding on appropriate therapies, etc. Accurate clinical reasoning requires extensive medical knowledge and rich clinical experience, setting a high bar for physicians. This is particularly challenging in developing countries due to the overwhelming number of patients and limited physician resources, contributing significantly to global health inequity and necessitating automated clinical reasoning approaches. Recently, the emergence of large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT and GPT-4 have demonstrated their potential in clinical reasoning. However, these LLMs are prone to hallucination problems, and the reasoning process of LLMs may not align with the clinical decision path of physicians. In this study, we introduce a novel framework, In-Context Padding (ICP), designed to enhance LLMs with medical knowledge. Specifically, we infer critical clinical reasoning elements (referred to as knowledge seeds) and use these as anchors to guide the generation process of LLMs. Experiments on two clinical question datasets demonstrate that ICP significantly improves the clinical reasoning ability of LLMs.
6/11/2024
Context-Specific Refinements of Bayesian Network Classifiers
Manuele Leonelli, Gherardo Varando
0
0
Supervised classification is one of the most ubiquitous tasks in machine learning. Generative classifiers based on Bayesian networks are often used because of their interpretability and competitive accuracy. The widely used naive and TAN classifiers are specific instances of Bayesian network classifiers with a constrained underlying graph. This paper introduces novel classes of generative classifiers extending TAN and other famous types of Bayesian network classifiers. Our approach is based on staged tree models, which extend Bayesian networks by allowing for complex, context-specific patterns of dependence. We formally study the relationship between our novel classes of classifiers and Bayesian networks. We introduce and implement data-driven learning routines for our models and investigate their accuracy in an extensive computational study. The study demonstrates that models embedding asymmetric information can enhance classification accuracy.
5/29/2024
Probabilistic Reasoning in Generative Large Language Models
Aliakbar Nafar, Kristen Brent Venable, Parisa Kordjamshidi
0
0
This paper considers the challenges Large Language Models (LLMs) face when reasoning over text that includes information involving uncertainty explicitly quantified via probability values. This type of reasoning is relevant to a variety of contexts ranging from everyday conversations to medical decision-making. Despite improvements in the mathematical reasoning capabilities of LLMs, they still exhibit significant difficulties when it comes to probabilistic reasoning. To deal with this problem, we introduce the Bayesian Linguistic Inference Dataset (BLInD), a new dataset specifically designed to test the probabilistic reasoning capabilities of LLMs. We use BLInD to find out the limitations of LLMs for tasks involving probabilistic reasoning. In addition, we present several prompting strategies that map the problem to different formal representations, including Python code, probabilistic algorithms, and probabilistic logical programming. We conclude by providing an evaluation of our methods on BLInD and an adaptation of a causal reasoning question-answering dataset. Our empirical results highlight the effectiveness of our proposed strategies for multiple LLMs.
6/18/2024