Probabilistic Reasoning in Generative Large Language Models
2402.09614
0
0
Abstract
This paper considers the challenges Large Language Models (LLMs) face when reasoning over text that includes information involving uncertainty explicitly quantified via probability values. This type of reasoning is relevant to a variety of contexts ranging from everyday conversations to medical decision-making. Despite improvements in the mathematical reasoning capabilities of LLMs, they still exhibit significant difficulties when it comes to probabilistic reasoning. To deal with this problem, we introduce the Bayesian Linguistic Inference Dataset (BLInD), a new dataset specifically designed to test the probabilistic reasoning capabilities of LLMs. We use BLInD to find out the limitations of LLMs for tasks involving probabilistic reasoning. In addition, we present several prompting strategies that map the problem to different formal representations, including Python code, probabilistic algorithms, and probabilistic logical programming. We conclude by providing an evaluation of our methods on BLInD and an adaptation of a causal reasoning question-answering dataset. Our empirical results highlight the effectiveness of our proposed strategies for multiple LLMs.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the integration of probabilistic reasoning capabilities into large language models (LLMs) to enhance their ability to handle uncertainty and make more logical inferences.
- The authors investigate methods for enabling LLMs to reason about probabilities and leverage this understanding to improve their performance on various tasks.
- The research aims to address the limitations of current LLMs in handling probabilistic information and make progress towards more logically consistent and reliable language models.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) are powerful AI systems that can generate human-like text, answer questions, and perform a variety of language-related tasks. However, these models can sometimes struggle with reasoning about uncertainty and making logical inferences.
This paper explores ways to integrate probabilistic reasoning capabilities into LLMs to help them better handle uncertainty and make more logically consistent decisions. The authors investigate different approaches for imbuing LLMs with an understanding of probabilities and how to apply this knowledge to improve their performance on various tasks.
The goal is to address the limitations of current LLMs in dealing with probabilistic information and move towards language models that are more logically consistent and reliable. By combining the impressive language generation abilities of LLMs with the principled reasoning of probabilistic models, the researchers hope to create AI systems that can better navigate the complexities of the real world.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes several techniques for integrating probabilistic reasoning into LLMs:
-
Verbalized Probabilistic Graphical Modeling: The authors explore ways to represent probabilistic relationships between concepts using verbalized probabilistic graphical models (VPGMs) and incorporate this structured knowledge into LLMs. This allows the models to reason about probabilities and make more logically consistent inferences. (Verbalized Probabilistic Graphical Modeling in Large Language Models)
-
Towards Logically Consistent Language Models: The researchers investigate methods for instilling LLMs with a better understanding of logical reasoning, enabling them to make more coherent and consistent decisions. This involves techniques like incorporating logical constraints and reasoning principles into the model training process. (Towards Logically Consistent Language Models via Probabilistic Reasoning)
-
Evaluating Interventional Reasoning Capabilities: The paper presents a framework for evaluating the interventional reasoning capabilities of LLMs, which is crucial for assessing their ability to reason about cause-and-effect relationships and make logical inferences. (What are the Odds? Evaluating the Interventional Reasoning Capabilities of Language Models)
-
Logically Consistent Language Models: The authors explore techniques for developing LLMs that can engage in more logically consistent reasoning, such as by incorporating probabilistic graphical models and logical constraints into the model training process. (Evaluating the Interventional Reasoning Capabilities of Large Language Models)
-
Logical Reasoning Evaluation: The paper introduces LogicBench, a benchmark suite for systematically evaluating the logical reasoning abilities of LLMs. This allows for a more comprehensive assessment of the models' ability to reason logically and make consistent inferences. (LogicBench: Towards a Systematic Evaluation of Logical Reasoning Ability in Large Language Models)
By addressing these key areas, the researchers aim to advance the state of the art in probabilistic reasoning and logical consistency within large language models, paving the way for more reliable and robust AI systems.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a well-rounded approach to incorporating probabilistic reasoning into LLMs, addressing both the theoretical and practical aspects of this challenge. The authors' focus on evaluating the models' interventional reasoning capabilities and developing benchmarks for logical reasoning is particularly important, as it allows for a more comprehensive assessment of the models' abilities.
However, the paper also acknowledges the significant challenges involved in this endeavor, such as the inherent complexity of real-world reasoning and the difficulty of aligning LLMs with logical reasoning principles. The authors note that further research is needed to address these limitations and continue to improve the probabilistic reasoning capabilities of large language models.
Additionally, the potential risks and ethical implications of deploying LLMs with enhanced probabilistic reasoning abilities should be carefully considered. While these advancements could lead to more reliable and trustworthy AI systems, there are also concerns about the amplification of biases, the potential for misuse, and the societal impact of such powerful language models.
Conclusion
This paper represents an important step towards integrating probabilistic reasoning into large language models, addressing a key limitation of current LLMs and paving the way for more logically consistent and reliable AI systems. By combining the impressive language generation abilities of LLMs with principled probabilistic reasoning, the researchers hope to create AI assistants that can better navigate the complexities of the real world and make more informed, logical decisions.
As the field of AI continues to advance, the integration of probabilistic reasoning into LLMs will likely become increasingly crucial, allowing these models to better handle uncertainty, make more robust inferences, and ultimately provide more trustworthy and beneficial assistance to users. The techniques and insights presented in this paper lay the groundwork for further research and development in this important area.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Verbalized Probabilistic Graphical Modeling with Large Language Models
Hengguan Huang, Xing Shen, Songtao Wang, Dianbo Liu, Hao Wang
0
0
Faced with complex problems, the human brain demonstrates a remarkable capacity to transcend sensory input and form latent understandings of perceived world patterns. However, this cognitive capacity is not explicitly considered or encoded in current large language models (LLMs). As a result, LLMs often struggle to capture latent structures and model uncertainty in complex compositional reasoning tasks. This work introduces a novel Bayesian prompting approach that facilitates training-free Bayesian inference with LLMs by using a verbalized Probabilistic Graphical Model (PGM). While traditional Bayesian approaches typically depend on extensive data and predetermined mathematical structures for learning latent factors and dependencies, our approach efficiently reasons latent variables and their probabilistic dependencies by prompting LLMs to adhere to Bayesian principles. We evaluated our model on several compositional reasoning tasks, both close-ended and open-ended. Our results indicate that the model effectively enhances confidence elicitation and text generation quality, demonstrating its potential to improve AI language understanding systems, especially in modeling uncertainty.
6/11/2024
Towards Logically Consistent Language Models via Probabilistic Reasoning
Diego Calanzone, Stefano Teso, Antonio Vergari
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) are a promising venue for natural language understanding and generation tasks. However, current LLMs are far from reliable: they are prone to generate non-factual information and, more crucially, to contradict themselves when prompted to reason about beliefs of the world. These problems are currently addressed with large scale fine-tuning or by delegating consistent reasoning to external tools. In this work, we strive for a middle ground and introduce a training objective based on principled probabilistic reasoning that teaches a LLM to be consistent with external knowledge in the form of a set of facts and rules. Fine-tuning with our loss on a limited set of facts enables our LLMs to be more logically consistent than previous baselines and allows them to extrapolate to unseen but semantically similar factual knowledge more systematically.
4/22/2024
💬
What Are the Odds? Language Models Are Capable of Probabilistic Reasoning
Akshay Paruchuri, Jake Garrison, Shun Liao, John Hernandez, Jacob Sunshine, Tim Althoff, Xin Liu, Daniel McDuff
0
0
Language models (LM) are capable of remarkably complex linguistic tasks; however, numerical reasoning is an area in which they frequently struggle. An important but rarely evaluated form of reasoning is understanding probability distributions. In this paper, we focus on evaluating the probabilistic reasoning capabilities of LMs using idealized and real-world statistical distributions. We perform a systematic evaluation of state-of-the-art LMs on three tasks: estimating percentiles, drawing samples, and calculating probabilities. We evaluate three ways to provide context to LMs 1) anchoring examples from within a distribution or family of distributions, 2) real-world context, 3) summary statistics on which to base a Normal approximation. Models can make inferences about distributions, and can be further aided by the incorporation of real-world context, example shots and simplified assumptions, even if these assumptions are incorrect or misspecified. To conduct this work, we developed a comprehensive benchmark distribution dataset with associated question-answer pairs that we will release publicly.
6/19/2024
Evaluating Interventional Reasoning Capabilities of Large Language Models
Tejas Kasetty, Divyat Mahajan, Gintare Karolina Dziugaite, Alexandre Drouin, Dhanya Sridhar
0
0
Numerous decision-making tasks require estimating causal effects under interventions on different parts of a system. As practitioners consider using large language models (LLMs) to automate decisions, studying their causal reasoning capabilities becomes crucial. A recent line of work evaluates LLMs ability to retrieve commonsense causal facts, but these evaluations do not sufficiently assess how LLMs reason about interventions. Motivated by the role that interventions play in causal inference, in this paper, we conduct empirical analyses to evaluate whether LLMs can accurately update their knowledge of a data-generating process in response to an intervention. We create benchmarks that span diverse causal graphs (e.g., confounding, mediation) and variable types, and enable a study of intervention-based reasoning. These benchmarks allow us to isolate the ability of LLMs to accurately predict changes resulting from their ability to memorize facts or find other shortcuts. Our analysis on four LLMs highlights that while GPT- 4 models show promising accuracy at predicting the intervention effects, they remain sensitive to distracting factors in the prompts.
4/9/2024