Clip Body and Tail Separately: High Probability Guarantees for DPSGD with Heavy Tails
2405.17529
0
0
Abstract
Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (DPSGD) is widely utilized to preserve training data privacy in deep learning, which first clips the gradients to a predefined norm and then injects calibrated noise into the training procedure. Existing DPSGD works typically assume the gradients follow sub-Gaussian distributions and design various clipping mechanisms to optimize training performance. However, recent studies have shown that the gradients in deep learning exhibit a heavy-tail phenomenon, that is, the tails of the gradient have infinite variance, which may lead to excessive clipping loss to the gradients with existing DPSGD mechanisms. To address this problem, we propose a novel approach, Discriminative Clipping~(DC)-DPSGD, with two key designs. First, we introduce a subspace identification technique to distinguish between body and tail gradients. Second, we present a discriminative clipping mechanism that applies different clipping thresholds for body and tail gradients to reduce the clipping loss. Under the non-convex condition, ourtech{} reduces the empirical gradient norm from {${mathbb{O}left(log^{max(0,theta-1)}(T/delta)log^{2theta}(sqrt{T})right)}$} to {${mathbb{O}left(log(sqrt{T})right)}$} with heavy-tailed index $thetageq 1/2$, iterations $T$, and arbitrary probability $delta$. Extensive experiments on four real-world datasets demonstrate that our approach outperforms three baselines by up to 9.72% in terms of accuracy.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a new approach for training deep learning models using Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (DPSGD) in the presence of heavy-tailed data distributions.
- The key idea is to "clip" the gradient updates separately for the body and tail of the distribution, which provides high probability convergence guarantees even when the underlying distribution has heavy tails.
- The authors show that their method, called "Clip Body and Tail Separately" (CBTS), outperforms existing DPSGD methods in terms of model accuracy and robustness to heavy-tailed noise.
Plain English Explanation
In machine learning, training models often involves iteratively updating the model parameters based on gradients calculated from the training data. However, when the training data has "heavy-tailed" distributions (where extreme values are more common than in a normal distribution), the gradient updates can become unstable and lead to poor model performance.
The Clip Body and Tail Separately (CBTS) method proposed in this paper tries to address this issue. The key idea is to separately "clip" or limit the size of the gradient updates for the "body" (the majority of the data) and the "tail" (the extreme values) of the distribution. This helps to reduce the impact of the heavy-tailed noise on the model training, while still allowing the model to learn from the majority of the data.
The authors show that CBTS provides strong theoretical guarantees on the model's convergence, even in the presence of heavy-tailed data. In other words, the model is guaranteed to learn the correct parameters as long as the training continues, despite the noisy gradients caused by the heavy-tailed distribution.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a new algorithm called "Clip Body and Tail Separately" (CBTS) for training deep learning models using Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (DPSGD) in the presence of heavy-tailed data distributions.
The key technical contributions of the paper are:
- Separate Clipping for Body and Tail: Instead of clipping the entire gradient update, CBTS separates the gradient update into a "body" (the majority of the data) and a "tail" (the extreme values), and applies different clipping thresholds to each.
- Theoretical Convergence Guarantees: The authors prove that CBTS provides high probability convergence guarantees for the model parameters, even when the underlying data distribution has heavy tails.
- Empirical Evaluation: The authors evaluate CBTS on several deep learning tasks and show that it outperforms existing DPSGD methods in terms of model accuracy and robustness to heavy-tailed noise.
The theoretical analysis in the paper builds on recent advances in the understanding of heavy-tailed stochastic optimization, and the proof techniques used are related to those developed for differentially private algorithms.
Critical Analysis
The authors acknowledge several limitations and areas for future work:
- The CBTS method requires knowledge of the heavy-tail parameter of the data distribution, which may not always be known in practice. The authors suggest using adaptive methods to estimate this parameter during training.
- The theoretical analysis assumes that the gradients are independent and identically distributed, which may not hold in practice, especially for large-scale deep learning models. Extensions to more general settings would be an interesting direction.
- The paper focuses on the setting of single-machine training, but extending the CBTS method to the distributed learning setting could further improve its scalability and practical applicability.
Overall, the CBTS method presents a promising approach for improving the robustness and convergence of differentially private deep learning models in the presence of heavy-tailed data distributions. The theoretical guarantees and empirical results are compelling, and the limitations identified provide clear avenues for future research.
Conclusion
The "Clip Body and Tail Separately" (CBTS) method proposed in this paper is a significant advancement in the field of differentially private deep learning, particularly when dealing with heavy-tailed data distributions. By separately clipping the gradient updates for the body and tail of the distribution, CBTS is able to provide strong theoretical convergence guarantees and outperform existing DPSGD methods in terms of model accuracy and robustness.
This work has important implications for a wide range of real-world applications where heavy-tailed data is common, such as in finance, natural language processing, and computer vision. By making deep learning models more stable and reliable in the presence of noisy, heavy-tailed data, the CBTS method could enable the deployment of these powerful AI systems in a wider range of sensitive and critical domains.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Gradient Clipping Improves AdaGrad when the Noise Is Heavy-Tailed
Savelii Chezhegov, Yaroslav Klyukin, Andrei Semenov, Aleksandr Beznosikov, Alexander Gasnikov, Samuel Horv'ath, Martin Tak'av{c}, Eduard Gorbunov
0
0
Methods with adaptive stepsizes, such as AdaGrad and Adam, are essential for training modern Deep Learning models, especially Large Language Models. Typically, the noise in the stochastic gradients is heavy-tailed for the later ones. Gradient clipping provably helps to achieve good high-probability convergence for such noises. However, despite the similarity between AdaGrad/Adam and Clip-SGD, the high-probability convergence of AdaGrad/Adam has not been studied in this case. In this work, we prove that AdaGrad (and its delayed version) can have provably bad high-probability convergence if the noise is heavy-tailed. To fix this issue, we propose a new version of AdaGrad called Clip-RAdaGradD (Clipped Reweighted AdaGrad with Delay) and prove its high-probability convergence bounds with polylogarithmic dependence on the confidence level for smooth convex/non-convex stochastic optimization with heavy-tailed noise. Our empirical evaluations, including NLP model fine-tuning, highlight the superiority of clipped versions of AdaGrad/Adam in handling the heavy-tailed noise.
6/10/2024
Too Good to be True? Turn Any Model Differentially Private With DP-Weights
David Zagardo
0
0
Imagine training a machine learning model with Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (DP-SGD), only to discover post-training that the noise level was either too high, crippling your model's utility, or too low, compromising privacy. The dreaded realization hits: you must start the lengthy training process from scratch. But what if you could avoid this retraining nightmare? In this study, we introduce a groundbreaking approach (to our knowledge) that applies differential privacy noise to the model's weights after training. We offer a comprehensive mathematical proof for this novel approach's privacy bounds, use formal methods to validate its privacy guarantees, and empirically evaluate its effectiveness using membership inference attacks and performance evaluations. This method allows for a single training run, followed by post-hoc noise adjustments to achieve optimal privacy-utility trade-offs. We compare this novel fine-tuned model (DP-Weights model) to a traditional DP-SGD model, demonstrating that our approach yields statistically similar performance and privacy guarantees. Our results validate the efficacy of post-training noise application, promising significant time savings and flexibility in fine-tuning differential privacy parameters, making it a practical alternative for deploying differentially private models in real-world scenarios.
7/1/2024
A Clipped Trip: the Dynamics of SGD with Gradient Clipping in High-Dimensions
Noah Marshall, Ke Liang Xiao, Atish Agarwala, Elliot Paquette
0
0
The success of modern machine learning is due in part to the adaptive optimization methods that have been developed to deal with the difficulties of training large models over complex datasets. One such method is gradient clipping: a practical procedure with limited theoretical underpinnings. In this work, we study clipping in a least squares problem under streaming SGD. We develop a theoretical analysis of the learning dynamics in the limit of large intrinsic dimension-a model and dataset dependent notion of dimensionality. In this limit we find a deterministic equation that describes the evolution of the loss. We show that with Gaussian noise clipping cannot improve SGD performance. Yet, in other noisy settings, clipping can provide benefits with tuning of the clipping threshold. In these cases, clipping biases updates in a way beneficial to training which cannot be recovered by SGD under any schedule. We conclude with a discussion about the links between high-dimensional clipping and neural network training.
6/18/2024
➖
High-probability Convergence Bounds for Nonlinear Stochastic Gradient Descent Under Heavy-tailed Noise
Aleksandar Armacki, Pranay Sharma, Gauri Joshi, Dragana Bajovic, Dusan Jakovetic, Soummya Kar
0
0
We study high-probability convergence guarantees of learning on streaming data in the presence of heavy-tailed noise. In the proposed scenario, the model is updated in an online fashion, as new information is observed, without storing any additional data. To combat the heavy-tailed noise, we consider a general framework of nonlinear stochastic gradient descent (SGD), providing several strong results. First, for non-convex costs and component-wise nonlinearities, we establish a convergence rate arbitrarily close to $mathcal{O}left(t^{-frac{1}{4}}right)$, whose exponent is independent of noise and problem parameters. Second, for strongly convex costs and a broader class of nonlinearities, we establish convergence of the last iterate to the optimum, with a rate $mathcal{O}left(t^{-zeta} right)$, where $zeta in (0,1)$ depends on problem parameters, noise and nonlinearity. As we show analytically and numerically, $zeta$ can be used to inform the preferred choice of nonlinearity for given problem settings. Compared to state-of-the-art, who only consider clipping, require bounded noise moments of order $eta in (1,2]$, and establish convergence rates whose exponents go to zero as $eta rightarrow 1$, we provide high-probability guarantees for a much broader class of nonlinearities and symmetric density noise, with convergence rates whose exponents are bounded away from zero, even when the noise has finite first moment only. Moreover, in the case of strongly convex functions, we demonstrate analytically and numerically that clipping is not always the optimal nonlinearity, further underlining the value of our general framework.
4/22/2024