The Cognitive Revolution in Interpretability: From Explaining Behavior to Interpreting Representations and Algorithms
0
🗣️
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper discusses the evolution of interpretability in AI systems, moving from explaining model behavior to interpreting representations and algorithms.
- It covers the background, technical details, and critical analysis of this "cognitive revolution" in interpretability.
- The paper aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the current state of interpretability research and its implications for the field of AI.
Plain English Explanation
The paper examines the changing landscape of interpretability in AI systems. Interpretability refers to the ability to understand how an AI model arrives at its decisions or outputs.
In the past, the focus was mainly on explaining the
However, the authors argue that this approach has limitations. To truly understand AI systems, we need to look deeper - at the
By delving into the inner workings of AI models, researchers can gain better insights into how they function and potentially improve their safety and reliability. This mechanistic approach to interpretability is a crucial step in the development of more transparent and trustworthy AI systems.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by providing background on the evolution of interpretability in AI, tracing the field's progression from explaining model behavior to interpreting representations and algorithms.
The authors discuss various techniques that have been used to explain model behavior, such as feature importance and saliency maps. They then argue that these approaches have limitations and that a deeper understanding of AI systems can be achieved by examining their internal representations and algorithms.
The paper then delves into the technical details of this "cognitive revolution" in interpretability. The authors explore mechanistic approaches that aim to uncover the underlying mechanisms and causal structures within AI models. This includes techniques like activation and gradient analysis, ablation studies, and probing experiments.
The key insight is that by understanding the internal components and decision-making processes of AI systems, researchers can gain valuable insights that go beyond merely explaining their behavior. This can lead to improved safety, reliability, and trust in AI technology.
Critical Analysis
The paper acknowledges the limitations of the current approaches to interpretability and makes a compelling case for the importance of the "cognitive revolution" in this field. However, the authors also recognize that the mechanistic interpretation of AI systems is a complex and challenging task.
One potential issue raised is the difficulty in scaling these interpretability techniques to large, complex models, such as modern language models or reinforcement learning agents. The paper suggests that further research is needed to develop more scalable and efficient methods for interpreting these sophisticated AI systems.
Additionally, the paper highlights the need for close collaboration between AI researchers, cognitive scientists, and philosophers to fully understand the implications of this cognitive revolution in interpretability. Interdisciplinary perspectives can help address the ethical and societal considerations surrounding the development of interpretable and transparent AI systems.
Conclusion
The paper presents a comprehensive overview of the evolution of interpretability in AI, highlighting the shift from explaining model behavior to interpreting representations and algorithms. This "cognitive revolution" in interpretability is a crucial step towards developing more transparent, reliable, and trustworthy AI systems.
By delving into the inner workings of AI models, researchers can gain deeper insights into how these systems make decisions and potentially improve their safety and alignment with human values. While the mechanistic interpretation of AI is a complex challenge, the authors argue that it is a necessary step in the ongoing quest to understand and harness the power of artificial intelligence.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🗣️
0
The Cognitive Revolution in Interpretability: From Explaining Behavior to Interpreting Representations and Algorithms
Adam Davies, Ashkan Khakzar
Artificial neural networks have long been understood as black boxes: though we know their computation graphs and learned parameters, the knowledge encoded by these weights and functions they perform are not inherently interpretable. As such, from the early days of deep learning, there have been efforts to explain these models' behavior and understand them internally; and recently, mechanistic interpretability (MI) has emerged as a distinct research area studying the features and implicit algorithms learned by foundation models such as large language models. In this work, we aim to ground MI in the context of cognitive science, which has long struggled with analogous questions in studying and explaining the behavior of black box intelligent systems like the human brain. We leverage several important ideas and developments in the history of cognitive science to disentangle divergent objectives in MI and indicate a clear path forward. First, we argue that current methods are ripe to facilitate a transition in deep learning interpretation echoing the cognitive revolution in 20th-century psychology that shifted the study of human psychology from pure behaviorism toward mental representations and processing. Second, we propose a taxonomy mirroring key parallels in computational neuroscience to describe two broad categories of MI research, semantic interpretation (what latent representations are learned and used) and algorithmic interpretation (what operations are performed over representations) to elucidate their divergent goals and objects of study. Finally, we elaborate the parallels and distinctions between various approaches in both categories, analyze the respective strengths and weaknesses of representative works, clarify underlying assumptions, outline key challenges, and discuss the possibility of unifying these modes of interpretation under a common framework.
Read more8/13/2024
0
Challenges in Mechanistically Interpreting Model Representations
Satvik Golechha, James Dao
Mechanistic interpretability (MI) aims to understand AI models by reverse-engineering the exact algorithms neural networks learn. Most works in MI so far have studied behaviors and capabilities that are trivial and token-aligned. However, most capabilities important for safety and trust are not that trivial, which advocates for the study of hidden representations inside these networks as the unit of analysis. We formalize representations for features and behaviors, highlight their importance and evaluation, and perform an exploratory study of dishonesty representations in `Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.1'. We justify that studying representations is an important and under-studied field, and highlight several challenges that arise while attempting to do so through currently established methods in MI, showing their insufficiency and advocating work on new frameworks for the same.
Read more7/15/2024
0
Position Paper: An Inner Interpretability Framework for AI Inspired by Lessons from Cognitive Neuroscience
Martina G. Vilas, Federico Adolfi, David Poeppel, Gemma Roig
Inner Interpretability is a promising emerging field tasked with uncovering the inner mechanisms of AI systems, though how to develop these mechanistic theories is still much debated. Moreover, recent critiques raise issues that question its usefulness to advance the broader goals of AI. However, it has been overlooked that these issues resemble those that have been grappled with in another field: Cognitive Neuroscience. Here we draw the relevant connections and highlight lessons that can be transferred productively between fields. Based on these, we propose a general conceptual framework and give concrete methodological strategies for building mechanistic explanations in AI inner interpretability research. With this conceptual framework, Inner Interpretability can fend off critiques and position itself on a productive path to explain AI systems.
Read more8/1/2024
0
From Neurons to Neutrons: A Case Study in Interpretability
Ouail Kitouni, Niklas Nolte, V'ictor Samuel P'erez-D'iaz, Sokratis Trifinopoulos, Mike Williams
Mechanistic Interpretability (MI) promises a path toward fully understanding how neural networks make their predictions. Prior work demonstrates that even when trained to perform simple arithmetic, models can implement a variety of algorithms (sometimes concurrently) depending on initialization and hyperparameters. Does this mean neuron-level interpretability techniques have limited applicability? We argue that high-dimensional neural networks can learn low-dimensional representations of their training data that are useful beyond simply making good predictions. Such representations can be understood through the mechanistic interpretability lens and provide insights that are surprisingly faithful to human-derived domain knowledge. This indicates that such approaches to interpretability can be useful for deriving a new understanding of a problem from models trained to solve it. As a case study, we extract nuclear physics concepts by studying models trained to reproduce nuclear data.
Read more5/28/2024