CompA: Addressing the Gap in Compositional Reasoning in Audio-Language Models
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper "CompA: Addressing the Gap in Compositional Reasoning in Audio-Language Models" introduces a new benchmark called CompA to evaluate the compositional reasoning capabilities of audio-language models (ALMs).
- Current benchmarks are insufficient for assessing compositional reasoning in ALMs, as they focus on single-modal tasks and do not capture the nuanced interactions between audio and language.
- The CompA benchmark includes a diverse set of tasks that require models to understand and reason about the compositional relationships between audio and language.
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses the importance of developing audio-language models (ALMs) that can engage in "compositional reasoning" - the ability to understand and reason about the complex interactions between audio and language. Current benchmarks for evaluating ALMs are limited, as they focus on single-modal tasks that don't capture the nuanced ways audio and language can work together.
To address this gap, the researchers created a new benchmark called CompA. CompA includes a variety of tasks that assess an ALM's ability to understand the compositional relationships between audio and language. For example, one task might ask the model to identify the musical instrument being played in an audio clip, while another task might require the model to determine how changes in the audio affect the meaning of a related text.
By using a more diverse set of tasks, CompA aims to provide a more comprehensive evaluation of an ALM's compositional reasoning capabilities. This is an important step in developing ALMs that can truly understand and reason about the rich interplay between sound and language, which has many potential applications in areas like human-machine interaction, audio-visual processing, and multimodal learning.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a new benchmark called CompA (Compositional Audio) to evaluate the compositional reasoning capabilities of audio-language models (ALMs). Current benchmarks for ALMs, such as CLAP and CoCola, focus on single-modal tasks and do not capture the nuanced interactions between audio and language.
The CompA benchmark includes a diverse set of tasks that require models to understand and reason about the compositional relationships between audio and language. These tasks include:
- Identifying the musical instrument being played in an audio clip
- Determining how changes in the audio affect the meaning of a related text
- Answering questions about the relationship between audio and language in a given scenario
The researchers argue that these types of compositional reasoning tasks are crucial for developing ALMs that can truly understand and reason about the rich interplay between sound and language. By using a more comprehensive set of tasks, CompA aims to provide a more robust evaluation of an ALM's capabilities compared to existing benchmarks.
The paper also includes results from experiments using several state-of-the-art ALMs on the CompA benchmark. The findings suggest that current ALMs struggle with compositional reasoning, highlighting the need for further research and development in this area.
Critical Analysis
The CompA benchmark represents an important step forward in the evaluation of audio-language models. By focusing on compositional reasoning, the benchmark addresses a critical gap in current evaluation methods, which tend to rely on single-modal tasks that do not capture the nuanced interactions between audio and language.
However, the paper does acknowledge some limitations of the CompA benchmark. For example, the tasks may not fully capture the complexities of real-world audio-language interactions, and the benchmark may not be suitable for evaluating certain types of ALMs, such as those focused on specific applications like speech recognition or music generation.
Additionally, while the paper presents findings on the performance of several state-of-the-art ALMs on the CompA benchmark, it does not provide a detailed analysis of the specific strengths and weaknesses of these models. Further research is needed to better understand the factors that contribute to compositional reasoning in ALMs and how to design models and training approaches that can effectively address this capability.
Conclusion
The "CompA: Addressing the Gap in Compositional Reasoning in Audio-Language Models" paper introduces a new benchmark that aims to better evaluate the compositional reasoning capabilities of audio-language models. By focusing on tasks that require models to understand the complex interactions between audio and language, CompA represents an important step forward in the development of more comprehensive evaluation methods for these types of multimodal AI systems.
The findings from the paper suggest that current state-of-the-art ALMs struggle with compositional reasoning, highlighting the need for further research and innovation in this area. As audio-language models continue to advance, the CompA benchmark and similar evaluation approaches will be crucial for driving progress and ensuring that these models can truly understand and reason about the rich interplay between sound and language.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
CompA: Addressing the Gap in Compositional Reasoning in Audio-Language Models
Sreyan Ghosh, Ashish Seth, Sonal Kumar, Utkarsh Tyagi, Chandra Kiran Evuru, S. Ramaneswaran, S. Sakshi, Oriol Nieto, Ramani Duraiswami, Dinesh Manocha
A fundamental characteristic of audio is its compositional nature. Audio-language models (ALMs) trained using a contrastive approach (e.g., CLAP) that learns a shared representation between audio and language modalities have improved performance in many downstream applications, including zero-shot audio classification, audio retrieval, etc. However, the ability of these models to effectively perform compositional reasoning remains largely unexplored and necessitates additional research. In this paper, we propose CompA, a collection of two expert-annotated benchmarks with a majority of real-world audio samples, to evaluate compositional reasoning in ALMs. Our proposed CompA-order evaluates how well an ALM understands the order or occurrence of acoustic events in audio, and CompA-attribute evaluates attribute-binding of acoustic events. An instance from either benchmark consists of two audio-caption pairs, where both audios have the same acoustic events but with different compositions. An ALM is evaluated on how well it matches the right audio to the right caption. Using this benchmark, we first show that current ALMs perform only marginally better than random chance, thereby struggling with compositional reasoning. Next, we propose CompA-CLAP, where we fine-tune CLAP using a novel learning method to improve its compositional reasoning abilities. To train CompA-CLAP, we first propose improvements to contrastive training with composition-aware hard negatives, allowing for more focused training. Next, we propose a novel modular contrastive loss that helps the model learn fine-grained compositional understanding and overcomes the acute scarcity of openly available compositional audios. CompA-CLAP significantly improves over all our baseline models on the CompA benchmark, indicating its superior compositional reasoning capabilities.
Read more8/1/2024
📈
0
GAMA: A Large Audio-Language Model with Advanced Audio Understanding and Complex Reasoning Abilities
Sreyan Ghosh, Sonal Kumar, Ashish Seth, Chandra Kiran Reddy Evuru, Utkarsh Tyagi, S Sakshi, Oriol Nieto, Ramani Duraiswami, Dinesh Manocha
Perceiving and understanding non-speech sounds and non-verbal speech is essential to making decisions that help us interact with our surroundings. In this paper, we propose GAMA, a novel General-purpose Large Audio-Language Model (LALM) with Advanced Audio Understanding and Complex Reasoning Abilities. We build GAMA by integrating an LLM with multiple types of audio representations, including features from a custom Audio Q-Former, a multi-layer aggregator that aggregates features from multiple layers of an audio encoder. We fine-tune GAMA on a large-scale audio-language dataset, which augments it with audio understanding capabilities. Next, we propose CompA-R (Instruction-Tuning for Complex Audio Reasoning), a synthetically generated instruction-tuning (IT) dataset with instructions that require the model to perform complex reasoning on the input audio. We instruction-tune GAMA with CompA-R to endow it with complex reasoning abilities, where we further add a soft prompt as input with high-level semantic evidence by leveraging event tags of the input audio. Finally, we also propose CompA-R-test, a human-labeled evaluation dataset for evaluating the capabilities of LALMs on open-ended audio question-answering that requires complex reasoning. Through automated and expert human evaluations, we show that GAMA outperforms all other LALMs in literature on diverse audio understanding tasks by margins of 1%-84%. Further, GAMA IT-ed on CompA-R proves to be superior in its complex reasoning and instruction following capabilities.
Read more6/18/2024
0
A Survey on Compositional Learning of AI Models: Theoretical and Experimetnal Practices
Sania Sinha, Tanawan Premsri, Parisa Kordjamshidi
Compositional learning, mastering the ability to combine basic concepts and construct more intricate ones, is crucial for human cognition, especially in human language comprehension and visual perception. This notion is tightly connected to generalization over unobserved situations. Despite its integral role in intelligence, there is a lack of systematic theoretical and experimental research methodologies, making it difficult to analyze the compositional learning abilities of computational models. In this paper, we survey the literature on compositional learning of AI models and the connections made to cognitive studies. We identify abstract concepts of compositionality in cognitive and linguistic studies and connect these to the computational challenges faced by language and vision models in compositional reasoning. We overview the formal definitions, tasks, evaluation benchmarks, variety of computational models, and theoretical findings. We cover modern studies on large language models to provide a deeper understanding of the cutting-edge compositional capabilities exhibited by state-of-the-art AI models and pinpoint important directions for future research.
Read more6/14/2024
💬
0
Exploring the Compositional Deficiency of Large Language Models in Mathematical Reasoning
Jun Zhao, Jingqi Tong, Yurong Mou, Ming Zhang, Qi Zhang, Xuanjing Huang
Human cognition exhibits systematic compositionality, the algebraic ability to generate infinite novel combinations from finite learned components, which is the key to understanding and reasoning about complex logic. In this work, we investigate the compositionality of large language models (LLMs) in mathematical reasoning. Specifically, we construct a new dataset textsc{MathTrap}footnotemark[3] by introducing carefully designed logical traps into the problem descriptions of MATH and GSM8k. Since problems with logical flaws are quite rare in the real world, these represent ``unseen'' cases to LLMs. Solving these requires the models to systematically compose (1) the mathematical knowledge involved in the original problems with (2) knowledge related to the introduced traps. Our experiments show that while LLMs possess both components of requisite knowledge, they do not textbf{spontaneously} combine them to handle these novel cases. We explore several methods to mitigate this deficiency, such as natural language prompts, few-shot demonstrations, and fine-tuning. We find that LLMs' performance can be textbf{passively} improved through the above external intervention. Overall, systematic compositionality remains an open challenge for large language models.
Read more7/15/2024