Comparing Apples to Oranges: LLM-powered Multimodal Intention Prediction in an Object Categorization Task

Read original: arXiv:2404.08424 - Published 4/15/2024 by Hassan Ali, Philipp Allgeuer, Stefan Wermter
Total Score

0

Comparing Apples to Oranges: LLM-powered Multimodal Intention Prediction in an Object Categorization Task

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This research paper explores the use of large language models (LLMs) for multimodal intention prediction in an object categorization task.
  • The authors compare the performance of LLM-powered multimodal models to unimodal models that only use visual or textual inputs.
  • The study examines how LLMs can be leveraged to enhance intention prediction, which has applications in areas like human-robot interaction and virtual reality.

Plain English Explanation

The researchers wanted to see if using large language models (LLMs) could help predict a person's intention when they're looking at and categorizing different objects. LLMs are AI systems trained on vast amounts of text data, which gives them a broad understanding of language and the world.

In this study, the researchers set up an experiment where people looked at images of various objects and had to say what category the object belonged to, like "fruit" or "tool." The researchers then used different AI models to try to predict the person's intention - what they were thinking about and trying to do - based on the image and the person's response.

Some of the AI models only looked at the image, while others combined the image with text information from an LLM. The researchers found that the models that used the LLM performed better at predicting the person's intention compared to the models that only looked at the image.

This suggests that LLMs can provide valuable additional context and understanding that helps machines better interpret a person's thoughts and intentions, even in a simple task like categorizing objects. This could be useful for developing more intuitive and natural interactions between humans and AI systems, like virtual assistants or robots.

Technical Explanation

The researchers designed an object categorization task where participants viewed images of various objects and selected the appropriate category label (e.g., "fruit," "tool"). The researchers then trained several models to predict the participant's intention based on the image and their response:

  1. Unimodal Visual Model: A convolutional neural network that only used the image input to predict intention.
  2. Unimodal Text Model: A language model that only used the text response to predict intention.
  3. Multimodal Model: A model that combined the visual and text inputs using multimodal fusion techniques.
  4. LLM-powered Multimodal Model: A model that leveraged a large language model (LLM) to provide additional contextual understanding beyond the visual and text inputs.

The results showed that the LLM-powered multimodal model outperformed the other models in predicting participant intentions. This suggests that the rich semantic and commonsense knowledge captured by LLMs can enhance multimodal intention understanding, even in a seemingly simple task like object categorization.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thoughtful exploration of how LLMs can be leveraged to improve multimodal intention prediction. However, there are a few caveats to consider:

  1. Task Simplicity: The object categorization task used in the study is relatively straightforward, and it's unclear how well the findings would generalize to more complex, real-world scenarios.
  2. Lack of Generalization: The paper does not address how well the LLM-powered model would perform on tasks or datasets outside of the specific experiment.
  3. Ethical Considerations: While not discussed in the paper, the use of LLMs for intention prediction raises potential ethical concerns around privacy, bias, and transparency that should be carefully considered.

Further research is needed to better understand the limitations and broader implications of using LLMs for multimodal intention prediction, particularly in more complex, real-world settings.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates the potential of leveraging large language models to enhance multimodal intention prediction. By combining visual and textual inputs with the rich contextual understanding of LLMs, the researchers were able to improve the accuracy of intention prediction in an object categorization task.

These findings suggest that LLMs could play a valuable role in developing more intuitive and natural interactions between humans and AI systems, such as virtual assistants or robots. However, further research is needed to explore the limitations and ethical considerations of this approach.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Comparing Apples to Oranges: LLM-powered Multimodal Intention Prediction in an Object Categorization Task
Total Score

0

Comparing Apples to Oranges: LLM-powered Multimodal Intention Prediction in an Object Categorization Task

Hassan Ali, Philipp Allgeuer, Stefan Wermter

Intention-based Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) systems allow robots to perceive and interpret user actions to proactively interact with humans and adapt to their behavior. Therefore, intention prediction is pivotal in creating a natural interactive collaboration between humans and robots. In this paper, we examine the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) for inferring human intention during a collaborative object categorization task with a physical robot. We introduce a hierarchical approach for interpreting user non-verbal cues, like hand gestures, body poses, and facial expressions and combining them with environment states and user verbal cues captured using an existing Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) system. Our evaluation demonstrates the potential of LLMs to interpret non-verbal cues and to combine them with their context-understanding capabilities and real-world knowledge to support intention prediction during human-robot interaction.

Read more

4/15/2024

LIT: Large Language Model Driven Intention Tracking for Proactive Human-Robot Collaboration -- A Robot Sous-Chef Application
Total Score

0

LIT: Large Language Model Driven Intention Tracking for Proactive Human-Robot Collaboration -- A Robot Sous-Chef Application

Zhe Huang, John Pohovey, Ananya Yammanuru, Katherine Driggs-Campbell

Large Language Models (LLM) and Vision Language Models (VLM) enable robots to ground natural language prompts into control actions to achieve tasks in an open world. However, when applied to a long-horizon collaborative task, this formulation results in excessive prompting for initiating or clarifying robot actions at every step of the task. We propose Language-driven Intention Tracking (LIT), leveraging LLMs and VLMs to model the human user's long-term behavior and to predict the next human intention to guide the robot for proactive collaboration. We demonstrate smooth coordination between a LIT-based collaborative robot and the human user in collaborative cooking tasks.

Read more

6/21/2024

LaMI: Large Language Models for Multi-Modal Human-Robot Interaction
Total Score

0

LaMI: Large Language Models for Multi-Modal Human-Robot Interaction

Chao Wang, Stephan Hasler, Daniel Tanneberg, Felix Ocker, Frank Joublin, Antonello Ceravola, Joerg Deigmoeller, Michael Gienger

This paper presents an innovative large language model (LLM)-based robotic system for enhancing multi-modal human-robot interaction (HRI). Traditional HRI systems relied on complex designs for intent estimation, reasoning, and behavior generation, which were resource-intensive. In contrast, our system empowers researchers and practitioners to regulate robot behavior through three key aspects: providing high-level linguistic guidance, creating atomic actions and expressions the robot can use, and offering a set of examples. Implemented on a physical robot, it demonstrates proficiency in adapting to multi-modal inputs and determining the appropriate manner of action to assist humans with its arms, following researchers' defined guidelines. Simultaneously, it coordinates the robot's lid, neck, and ear movements with speech output to produce dynamic, multi-modal expressions. This showcases the system's potential to revolutionize HRI by shifting from conventional, manual state-and-flow design methods to an intuitive, guidance-based, and example-driven approach. Supplementary material can be found at https://hri-eu.github.io/Lami/

Read more

4/12/2024

Are Large Language Models Aligned with People's Social Intuitions for Human-Robot Interactions?
Total Score

0

Are Large Language Models Aligned with People's Social Intuitions for Human-Robot Interactions?

Lennart Wachowiak, Andrew Coles, Oya Celiktutan, Gerard Canal

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in robotics, especially for high-level action planning. Meanwhile, many robotics applications involve human supervisors or collaborators. Hence, it is crucial for LLMs to generate socially acceptable actions that align with people's preferences and values. In this work, we test whether LLMs capture people's intuitions about behavior judgments and communication preferences in human-robot interaction (HRI) scenarios. For evaluation, we reproduce three HRI user studies, comparing the output of LLMs with that of real participants. We find that GPT-4 strongly outperforms other models, generating answers that correlate strongly with users' answers in two studies $unicode{x2014}$ the first study dealing with selecting the most appropriate communicative act for a robot in various situations ($r_s$ = 0.82), and the second with judging the desirability, intentionality, and surprisingness of behavior ($r_s$ = 0.83). However, for the last study, testing whether people judge the behavior of robots and humans differently, no model achieves strong correlations. Moreover, we show that vision models fail to capture the essence of video stimuli and that LLMs tend to rate different communicative acts and behavior desirability higher than people.

Read more

7/10/2024