Concentration Inequalities for $(f,Gamma)$-GANs
2406.16834
0
0
🖼️
Abstract
Generative adversarial networks (GANs) are unsupervised learning methods for training a generator distribution to produce samples that approximate those drawn from a target distribution. Many such methods can be formulated as minimization of a metric or divergence. Recent works have proven the statistical consistency of GANs that are based on integral probability metrics (IPMs), e.g., WGAN which is based on the 1-Wasserstein metric. IPMs are defined by optimizing a linear functional (difference of expectations) over a space of discriminators. A much larger class of GANs, which allow for the use of nonlinear objective functionals, can be constructed using $(f,Gamma)$-divergences; these generalize and interpolate between IPMs and $f$-divergences (e.g., KL or $alpha$-divergences). Instances of $(f,Gamma)$-GANs have been shown to exhibit improved performance in a number of applications. In this work we study the statistical consistency of $(f,Gamma)$-GANs for general $f$ and $Gamma$. Specifically, we derive finite-sample concentration inequalities. These derivations require novel arguments due to nonlinearity of the objective functional. We demonstrate that our new results reduce to the known results for IPM-GANs in the appropriate limit while also significantly extending the domain of applicability of this theory.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents concentration inequalities for (f,Γ)-GANs, a generalized framework for generative adversarial networks (GANs).
- The authors derive bounds on the sample complexity required to estimate the GAN objective function within a desired accuracy, providing statistical guarantees for (f,Γ)-GAN training.
- The results can be applied to a wide range of GAN models, including Statistically Optimal Generative Modeling via Maximum Deviation from Neutral, Statistical Guarantees for Group-Invariant GANs, and Metrizing Fairness.
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses a type of generative adversarial network (GAN) called an (f,Γ)-GAN. GANs are machine learning models that can generate new data, like images or text, that looks similar to a given dataset.
The key idea in this paper is to provide statistical guarantees for how well (f,Γ)-GANs can estimate the objective function used to train them. The objective function is a mathematical formula that the GAN tries to optimize during training. The authors show that with enough training data, the GAN can estimate this objective function quite accurately.
This is important because it gives researchers and practitioners a better understanding of how well their GAN models will perform, without needing to train them for a very long time. The results can be applied to a wide variety of GAN models, including ones that try to ensure fairness or group-invariance.
By providing these statistical guarantees, the paper helps make GAN training more reliable and predictable, which could lead to better-performing generative models in the future.
Technical Explanation
The paper establishes concentration inequalities for (f,Γ)-GANs, a broad class of generative adversarial networks that encompasses many recent GAN variants. Specifically, the authors derive bounds on the sample complexity required to estimate the (f,Γ)-GAN objective function within a desired accuracy, providing statistical guarantees for the training process.
The key technical contributions are:
- Formulating the (f,Γ)-GAN optimization problem and establishing its connection to f-divergence minimization.
- Deriving high-probability bounds on the deviation between the empirical and population-level (f,Γ)-GAN objective functions.
- Showing how these concentration inequalities can be used to obtain sample complexity guarantees for (f,Γ)-GAN training.
The derived bounds rely on the properties of the generator function class Γ and the choice of f-divergence, which allows the results to be applied to a wide range of GAN models, including Statistically Optimal Generative Modeling via Maximum Deviation from Neutral, Statistical Guarantees for Group-Invariant GANs, and Metrizing Fairness.
The authors also discuss connections to related work on sample complexity bounds for divergence estimation, such as Better than KL: Probabilistic Models with Tight Adaptive PAC-Bayes Bounds and Sample Complexity Bounds for Estimating Probability Divergences.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a rigorous theoretical analysis of (f,Γ)-GANs, which is a significant contribution to the field of generative modeling. The concentration inequalities derived in the paper offer valuable statistical guarantees for GAN training, which can help researchers and practitioners better understand the performance and sample complexity of their models.
One potential limitation of the work is that the derived bounds may be conservative in practice, as they rely on worst-case assumptions about the function classes and divergences involved. It would be interesting to see how the bounds translate to empirical GAN performance in real-world scenarios.
Additionally, the paper does not address potential issues with GAN training, such as mode collapse or instability, which can still be challenges even with the provided statistical guarantees. Further research may be needed to understand how these concentration inequalities interact with other GAN training dynamics.
Overall, this paper represents an important step forward in the theoretical understanding of GANs and provides a solid foundation for future work on statistical guarantees in generative modeling.
Conclusion
This paper presents concentration inequalities for (f,Γ)-GANs, a generalized framework for generative adversarial networks. The derived bounds on the sample complexity required to estimate the GAN objective function within a desired accuracy offer statistical guarantees for (f,Γ)-GAN training.
The results can be applied to a wide range of GAN models, including those focused on fairness, group-invariance, and optimal generative modeling. By providing these theoretical guarantees, the paper represents an important contribution to the field of generative modeling, paving the way for more reliable and predictable GAN-based systems in the future.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🤷
Statistically Optimal Generative Modeling with Maximum Deviation from the Empirical Distribution
Elen Vardanyan, Sona Hunanyan, Tigran Galstyan, Arshak Minasyan, Arnak Dalalyan
0
0
This paper explores the problem of generative modeling, aiming to simulate diverse examples from an unknown distribution based on observed examples. While recent studies have focused on quantifying the statistical precision of popular algorithms, there is a lack of mathematical evaluation regarding the non-replication of observed examples and the creativity of the generative model. We present theoretical insights into this aspect, demonstrating that the Wasserstein GAN, constrained to left-invertible push-forward maps, generates distributions that avoid replication and significantly deviate from the empirical distribution. Importantly, we show that left-invertibility achieves this without compromising the statistical optimality of the resulting generator. Our most important contribution provides a finite-sample lower bound on the Wasserstein-1 distance between the generative distribution and the empirical one. We also establish a finite-sample upper bound on the distance between the generative distribution and the true data-generating one. Both bounds are explicit and show the impact of key parameters such as sample size, dimensions of the ambient and latent spaces, noise level, and smoothness measured by the Lipschitz constant.
6/7/2024
👀
Statistical Guarantees of Group-Invariant GANs
Ziyu Chen, Markos A. Katsoulakis, Luc Rey-Bellet, Wei Zhu
0
0
Group-invariant generative adversarial networks (GANs) are a type of GANs in which the generators and discriminators are hardwired with group symmetries. Empirical studies have shown that these networks are capable of learning group-invariant distributions with significantly improved data efficiency. In this study, we aim to rigorously quantify this improvement by analyzing the reduction in sample complexity for group-invariant GANs. Our findings indicate that when learning group-invariant distributions, the number of samples required for group-invariant GANs decreases proportionally by a factor of the group size. Importantly, this sample complexity reduction cannot be achieved merely through data augmentation due to the probabilistic dependence of augmented data. Numerical results substantiate our theory and highlight the stark contrast between learning with group-invariant GANs and using data augmentation. This work presents the first statistical performance guarantees for group-invariant generative models, specifically for GANs, and it may shed light on the study of other generative models with group symmetries.
6/6/2024
📈
Metrizing Fairness
Yves Rychener, Bahar Taskesen, Daniel Kuhn
0
0
We study supervised learning problems that have significant effects on individuals from two demographic groups, and we seek predictors that are fair with respect to a group fairness criterion such as statistical parity (SP). A predictor is SP-fair if the distributions of predictions within the two groups are close in Kolmogorov distance, and fairness is achieved by penalizing the dissimilarity of these two distributions in the objective function of the learning problem. In this paper, we identify conditions under which hard SP constraints are guaranteed to improve predictive accuracy. We also showcase conceptual and computational benefits of measuring unfairness with integral probability metrics (IPMs) other than the Kolmogorov distance. Conceptually, we show that the generator of any IPM can be interpreted as a family of utility functions and that unfairness with respect to this IPM arises if individuals in the two demographic groups have diverging expected utilities. We also prove that the unfairness-regularized prediction loss admits unbiased gradient estimators, which are constructed from random mini-batches of training samples, if unfairness is measured by the squared $mathcal L^2$-distance or by a squared maximum mean discrepancy. In this case, the fair learning problem is susceptible to efficient stochastic gradient descent (SGD) algorithms. Numerical experiments on synthetic and real data show that these SGD algorithms outperform state-of-the-art methods for fair learning in that they achieve superior accuracy-unfairness trade-offs -- sometimes orders of magnitude faster.
6/12/2024
🔄
Better-than-KL PAC-Bayes Bounds
Ilja Kuzborskij, Kwang-Sung Jun, Yulian Wu, Kyoungseok Jang, Francesco Orabona
0
0
Let $f(theta, X_1),$ $ dots,$ $ f(theta, X_n)$ be a sequence of random elements, where $f$ is a fixed scalar function, $X_1, dots, X_n$ are independent random variables (data), and $theta$ is a random parameter distributed according to some data-dependent posterior distribution $P_n$. In this paper, we consider the problem of proving concentration inequalities to estimate the mean of the sequence. An example of such a problem is the estimation of the generalization error of some predictor trained by a stochastic algorithm, such as a neural network where $f$ is a loss function. Classically, this problem is approached through a PAC-Bayes analysis where, in addition to the posterior, we choose a prior distribution which captures our belief about the inductive bias of the learning problem. Then, the key quantity in PAC-Bayes concentration bounds is a divergence that captures the complexity of the learning problem where the de facto standard choice is the KL divergence. However, the tightness of this choice has rarely been questioned. In this paper, we challenge the tightness of the KL-divergence-based bounds by showing that it is possible to achieve a strictly tighter bound. In particular, we demonstrate new high-probability PAC-Bayes bounds with a novel and better-than-KL divergence that is inspired by Zhang et al. (2022). Our proof is inspired by recent advances in regret analysis of gambling algorithms, and its use to derive concentration inequalities. Our result is first-of-its-kind in that existing PAC-Bayes bounds with non-KL divergences are not known to be strictly better than KL. Thus, we believe our work marks the first step towards identifying optimal rates of PAC-Bayes bounds.
4/5/2024