Sample Complexity Bounds for Estimating Probability Divergences under Invariances

Overview

• This paper examines how group invariances can improve sample complexity and convergence rates for various statistical tasks, such as estimating Wasserstein distance, Sobolev Integral Probability Metrics (Sobolev IPMs), Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD), and density estimation.
• The key findings are:
  1. Group invariances can reduce sample complexity by a factor related to the group size or the normalized volume of the quotient space.
  2. For groups of positive dimension, group invariances can also improve the convergence rate exponent.

Plain English Explanation

Many machine learning models, such as those for graphs, point clouds, and images, rely on probability distributions that are invariant to certain transformations, like rotations or translations. When working with these types of distributions, researchers often need to compare them using statistical distance measures.

This paper shows that the inherent symmetries in these distributions can provide a significant advantage. Specifically, the authors prove that group invariances can:

1. Reduce sample complexity: Fewer data points are needed to accurately estimate the statistical distance between two distributions, by a factor related to the size of the transformation group.
2. Improve convergence rates: The rate at which the distance estimate converges to the true value can be faster, especially for groups with a positive dimensional structure.

These results could have important implications for training generative models and other applications where accurate distribution comparison is crucial.

Technical Explanation

The authors study how group invariances, with respect to smooth actions of Lie groups on manifolds, can improve the sample complexity and convergence rates for several statistical tasks:

1. Wasserstein distance estimation: The 1-Wasserstein distance, which measures the distance between probability distributions.
2. Sobolev Integral Probability Metrics (Sobolev IPMs): A class of distance measures that compare the smoothness of distributions.
3. Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD): A kernel-based distance metric for comparing distributions.
4. Density estimation: Estimating the underlying probability density function in $L^2$ and $L^\infty$ norms.

For each of these problems, the authors derive new upper bounds on the sample complexity and convergence rates that exploit the group invariances. Specifically, they show:

1. Sample complexity reduction: The sample complexity is reduced by a multiplicative factor corresponding to the group size (for finite groups) or the normalized volume of the quotient space (for groups of positive dimension).
2. Improved convergence rates: For groups of positive dimension, the exponent in the convergence rate is improved compared to the non-invariant case.

These results extend and generalize recent bounds for finite group actions, providing a comprehensive understanding of how group invariances can benefit a wide range of statistical tasks.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough theoretical analysis of the benefits of group invariances for distribution estimation and comparison problems. The authors carefully consider various distance measures and density estimation tasks, deriving rigorous sample complexity and convergence rate bounds.

One potential limitation is that the results assume the group action is known and can be leveraged effectively. In practice, the group structure may not be fully known or easy to exploit, which could limit the practical impact of these findings. Additionally, the analysis focuses on asymptotic behavior, and the constants involved in the bounds are not always explicitly characterized.

Further research could explore more practical aspects, such as:

• Developing efficient algorithms that can leverage group invariances in real-world applications.
• Investigating the empirical performance of these techniques on diverse datasets and tasks.
• Studying the robustness of the methods to model misspecification or approximate group knowledge.

Overall, this paper makes a significant theoretical contribution by elucidating the fundamental advantages of group-invariant probability distributions in machine learning. The insights provided could inspire future work to bridge the gap between theory and practice, further advancing the field.

Conclusion

This paper demonstrates that group invariances in probability distributions can lead to substantial improvements in sample complexity and convergence rates for a variety of statistical tasks, including Wasserstein distance estimation, Sobolev IPMs, MMD, and density estimation. The key findings are the reduction in sample complexity by a factor related to the group size or the normalized volume of the quotient space, as well as the improved convergence rate exponents for groups of positive dimension.

These theoretical results could have important implications for training more efficient and accurate generative models, as well as other applications where precise distribution comparisons are critical. Future research should explore practical algorithms that can effectively leverage group invariances and empirically validate the benefits of this approach on real-world datasets and tasks.