Statistical Guarantees of Group-Invariant GANs
0
👀
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Group-invariant generative adversarial networks (GANs) are a type of GAN that incorporates group symmetries into the generator and discriminator
- Empirical studies have shown these networks can learn group-invariant distributions more efficiently than standard GANs
- This study aims to quantify the improvement in sample complexity when learning group-invariant distributions using group-invariant GANs
Plain English Explanation
Group-invariant GANs are a special kind of generative adversarial network (GAN) that are designed to learn patterns and distributions that are the same no matter how they are transformed or rotated. For example, if you were trying to generate images of chairs, a group-invariant GAN would be able to generate chair images that look the same whether they are flipped, rotated, or otherwise transformed.
The key insight is that by building in knowledge about the symmetries or transformations that the data exhibits, the network can learn much more efficiently. Instead of having to learn all the different transformed versions of the data from scratch, the network can leverage the group structure to generalize better from fewer examples.
This paper provides a rigorous mathematical analysis showing that the number of training samples required for group-invariant GANs decreases proportionally with the size of the symmetry group. In other words, the more symmetries or transformations the data has, the fewer examples the network needs to learn an accurate model. This is in contrast to simply augmenting the training data with transformed versions, which does not provide the same statistical benefits.
Technical Explanation
The key technical contribution of this paper is a theoretical analysis of the sample complexity for learning group-invariant distributions using group-invariant GANs. The authors show that the number of samples required scales inversely with the size of the symmetry group, meaning that as the group size increases, the sample complexity decreases proportionally.
Importantly, this sample complexity reduction cannot be achieved through simple data augmentation, as the augmented data points are probabilistically dependent. The authors provide theoretical analysis and numerical results to substantiate this point, highlighting the advantages of the group-invariant GAN architecture over data augmentation alone.
The paper builds on prior work on unsupervised learning of group-invariant and equivariant representations, inducing metrizability in GAN discriminators, and latent space symmetry discovery. It also has connections to research on generalized regression conditional GANs and guardians of quantum GANs.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a rigorous theoretical analysis and empirical validation of the benefits of group-invariant GANs over standard GANs and data augmentation. However, the authors acknowledge that their analysis is limited to the case of learning group-invariant distributions, and they do not consider more general scenarios where the data may exhibit other types of symmetries or structures.
Additionally, the paper does not address potential challenges in practice, such as how to effectively incorporate group symmetries into the GAN architecture or how to handle cases where the group structure is not known a priori. Further research may be needed to understand the real-world applicability and limitations of this approach.
That said, the core insight of leveraging group structure to improve sample efficiency is compelling and could have significant implications for the field of generative modeling. By reducing the amount of training data required, group-invariant GANs may enable the deployment of powerful generative models in settings with limited data, opening up new opportunities for their use.
Conclusion
This paper presents a rigorous theoretical and empirical analysis of group-invariant GANs, showing that they can learn group-invariant distributions with significantly improved sample efficiency compared to standard GANs and data augmentation. The key finding is that the sample complexity scales inversely with the size of the symmetry group, providing a principled way to leverage the underlying structure of the data to learn more from fewer examples.
While the current analysis is limited to specific group-invariant scenarios, the insights from this work could have broader implications for the design of more efficient and data-driven generative models. As the field of generative modeling continues to advance, techniques that can extract and exploit the inherent symmetries and structures in data may be crucial for unlocking the full potential of these powerful tools.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
👀
0
Statistical Guarantees of Group-Invariant GANs
Ziyu Chen, Markos A. Katsoulakis, Luc Rey-Bellet, Wei Zhu
Group-invariant generative adversarial networks (GANs) are a type of GANs in which the generators and discriminators are hardwired with group symmetries. Empirical studies have shown that these networks are capable of learning group-invariant distributions with significantly improved data efficiency. In this study, we aim to rigorously quantify this improvement by analyzing the reduction in sample complexity for group-invariant GANs. Our findings indicate that when learning group-invariant distributions, the number of samples required for group-invariant GANs decreases proportionally by a factor of the group size. Importantly, this sample complexity reduction cannot be achieved merely through data augmentation due to the probabilistic dependence of augmented data. Numerical results substantiate our theory and highlight the stark contrast between learning with group-invariant GANs and using data augmentation. This work presents the first statistical performance guarantees for group-invariant generative models, specifically for GANs, and it may shed light on the study of other generative models with group symmetries.
Read more6/6/2024
🖼️
0
Concentration Inequalities for $(f,Gamma)$-GANs
Jeremiah Birrell
Generative adversarial networks (GANs) are unsupervised learning methods for training a generator distribution to produce samples that approximate those drawn from a target distribution. Many such methods can be formulated as minimization of a metric or divergence. Recent works have proven the statistical consistency of GANs that are based on integral probability metrics (IPMs), e.g., WGAN which is based on the 1-Wasserstein metric. IPMs are defined by optimizing a linear functional (difference of expectations) over a space of discriminators. A much larger class of GANs, which allow for the use of nonlinear objective functionals, can be constructed using $(f,Gamma)$-divergences; these generalize and interpolate between IPMs and $f$-divergences (e.g., KL or $alpha$-divergences). Instances of $(f,Gamma)$-GANs have been shown to exhibit improved performance in a number of applications. In this work we study the statistical consistency of $(f,Gamma)$-GANs for general $f$ and $Gamma$. Specifically, we derive finite-sample concentration inequalities. These derivations require novel arguments due to nonlinearity of the objective functional. We demonstrate that our new results reduce to the known results for IPM-GANs in the appropriate limit while also significantly extending the domain of applicability of this theory.
Read more6/26/2024
🧠
0
Lie Group Decompositions for Equivariant Neural Networks
Mircea Mironenco, Patrick Forr'e
Invariance and equivariance to geometrical transformations have proven to be very useful inductive biases when training (convolutional) neural network models, especially in the low-data regime. Much work has focused on the case where the symmetry group employed is compact or abelian, or both. Recent work has explored enlarging the class of transformations used to the case of Lie groups, principally through the use of their Lie algebra, as well as the group exponential and logarithm maps. The applicability of such methods is limited by the fact that depending on the group of interest $G$, the exponential map may not be surjective. Further limitations are encountered when $G$ is neither compact nor abelian. Using the structure and geometry of Lie groups and their homogeneous spaces, we present a framework by which it is possible to work with such groups primarily focusing on the groups $G = text{GL}^{+}(n, mathbb{R})$ and $G = text{SL}(n, mathbb{R})$, as well as their representation as affine transformations $mathbb{R}^{n} rtimes G$. Invariant integration as well as a global parametrization is realized by a decomposition into subgroups and submanifolds which can be handled individually. Under this framework, we show how convolution kernels can be parametrized to build models equivariant with respect to affine transformations. We evaluate the robustness and out-of-distribution generalisation capability of our model on the benchmark affine-invariant classification task, outperforming previous proposals.
Read more7/11/2024
🤷
0
Statistically Optimal Generative Modeling with Maximum Deviation from the Empirical Distribution
Elen Vardanyan, Sona Hunanyan, Tigran Galstyan, Arshak Minasyan, Arnak Dalalyan
This paper explores the problem of generative modeling, aiming to simulate diverse examples from an unknown distribution based on observed examples. While recent studies have focused on quantifying the statistical precision of popular algorithms, there is a lack of mathematical evaluation regarding the non-replication of observed examples and the creativity of the generative model. We present theoretical insights into this aspect, demonstrating that the Wasserstein GAN, constrained to left-invertible push-forward maps, generates distributions that avoid replication and significantly deviate from the empirical distribution. Importantly, we show that left-invertibility achieves this without compromising the statistical optimality of the resulting generator. Our most important contribution provides a finite-sample lower bound on the Wasserstein-1 distance between the generative distribution and the empirical one. We also establish a finite-sample upper bound on the distance between the generative distribution and the true data-generating one. Both bounds are explicit and show the impact of key parameters such as sample size, dimensions of the ambient and latent spaces, noise level, and smoothness measured by the Lipschitz constant.
Read more6/7/2024