Concept-based explainability for an EEG transformer model

Overview

• Deep learning models are complex due to their size, structure, and randomness in training.
• Explaining the inner workings of these models is a challenge.
• Concept Activation Vectors (CAVs) aim to understand deep models' internal states in terms of human-aligned concepts.
• CAVs were first applied to image classification and later adapted to other domains, including natural language processing.
• This work attempts to apply CAVs to electroencephalogram (EEG) data for explainability in the BENDR transformer model.

Plain English Explanation

Deep learning models, which are the foundation of many AI systems, can be quite complex. This complexity arises from the massive size of the models, their intricate structure, and the inherent randomness involved in the training process. Explaining how these models arrive at their outputs is a significant challenge.

To address this, researchers introduced a technique called Concept Activation Vectors (CAVs). The idea behind CAVs is to understand the internal states of deep learning models in terms of human-understandable concepts. These concepts are identified as directions in the model's latent space, using linear discriminants.

This method was originally applied to image classification, but has since been adapted to other domains, including natural language processing. In this work, the researchers attempt to apply CAVs to electroencephalogram (EEG) data to explain the inner workings of the BENDR transformer model.

The key challenge in this endeavor is to define the explanatory concepts and select relevant datasets to ground these concepts in the model's latent space. The researchers explore two approaches: using externally labeled EEG datasets, and applying anatomically defined concepts. Both of these methods aim to provide valuable insights into the representations learned by deep EEG models.

Technical Explanation

The researchers in this work attempt to apply the Concept Activation Vectors (CAVs) method to electroencephalogram (EEG) data for explainability in the BENDR transformer model.

CAVs are a technique designed to understand the internal states of deep learning models in terms of human-aligned concepts. These concepts are identified as directions in the model's latent space, using linear discriminants.

The key challenge in this endeavor is to define the explanatory concepts and select relevant datasets to ground these concepts in the model's latent space. The researchers explore two approaches:

1. Externally Labeled EEG Datasets: This is a straightforward generalization of the methods used in image classification, where the concepts are derived from external dataset annotations.

2. Anatomically Defined Concepts: This is a novel approach specific to EEG data, where the concepts are based on anatomical brain regions.

The researchers present evidence that both of these approaches to concept formation yield valuable insights into the representations learned by the deep EEG model, BENDR.

Critical Analysis

The researchers in this work have made an important contribution by attempting to apply the Concept Activation Vectors (CAVs) method to electroencephalogram (EEG) data for explainability in the BENDR transformer model.

One potential limitation of the study is the reliance on external datasets and anatomical concepts, which may not fully capture the nuances of the EEG data and the BENDR model. Additionally, the researchers do not provide a detailed comparison of the two concept formation approaches, which could shed light on their relative strengths and weaknesses.

Further research could explore alternative concept formation methods, such as data-driven approaches that identify salient patterns in the EEG data itself. Additionally, it would be valuable to investigate the generalizability of the CAVs method across different EEG-based tasks and models, to better understand its broader applicability.

Overall, this work represents an important step towards improving the explainability of deep learning models in the EEG domain, and the insights gained could have significant implications for knowledge graph and natural language processing applications as well.

Conclusion

This work explores the application of Concept Activation Vectors (CAVs) to electroencephalogram (EEG) data for explainability in the BENDR transformer model. The researchers present two approaches to concept formation: using externally labeled EEG datasets and applying anatomically defined concepts.

The results demonstrate that both of these methods can provide valuable insights into the representations learned by the deep EEG model. This work represents an important step towards improving the explainability of complex deep learning models, with potential implications for a wide range of applications, including knowledge graphs and natural language processing.

However, the study also highlights the need for further research to explore alternative concept formation methods and investigate the generalizability of the CAVs approach across different EEG-based tasks and models. By continuing to advance the field of model explainability, researchers can help build more transparent and trustworthy AI systems.