Confidence-Aware Multi-Field Model Calibration

Read original: arXiv:2402.17655 - Published 5/22/2024 by Yuang Zhao, Chuhan Wu, Qinglin Jia, Hong Zhu, Jia Yan, Libin Zong, Linxuan Zhang, Zhenhua Dong, Muyu Zhang
Total Score

0

Confidence-Aware Multi-Field Model Calibration

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper proposes a new model calibration technique called Confidence-Aware Multi-Field Model Calibration (CAMMC) that can improve the reliability of predictions in online advertising systems.
  • The key ideas are to 1) calibrate multiple model outputs simultaneously, 2) leverage confidence information to guide the calibration process, and 3) perform the calibration in an online fashion to adapt to changing data distributions.
  • The authors demonstrate CAMMC's effectiveness on several real-world online advertising datasets, showing it can outperform standard calibration methods in terms of calibration and downstream task performance.

Plain English Explanation

Confidence-Aware Multi-Field Model Calibration (CAMMC) is a new technique for improving the reliability of machine learning models used in online advertising systems. In these systems, models make predictions about things like whether a user will click on an ad or make a purchase.

The key insight behind CAMMC is that we can improve model calibration - the ability of the model to accurately quantify its own uncertainty - by considering multiple model outputs simultaneously. For example, instead of just calibrating the predicted click-through rate, CAMMC also considers the model's confidence in that prediction.

By incorporating this confidence information, CAMMC can more effectively adjust the model's outputs to better match the true underlying probabilities. Importantly, CAMMC does this in an online fashion, meaning it can continuously adapt to changes in the data over time.

The authors show that CAMMC outperforms standard calibration methods on several real-world online advertising datasets. This improved calibration translates to better performance on downstream tasks, like optimizing ad placements. Overall, CAMMC provides a promising new approach for making machine learning models more reliable in high-stakes applications like online advertising.

Technical Explanation

Confidence-Aware Multi-Field Model Calibration (CAMMC) is a novel calibration technique that the authors propose to improve the reliability of machine learning models used in online advertising systems.

The key elements of CAMMC are:

  1. Multi-Field Calibration: Instead of calibrating a single model output (e.g., predicted click-through rate), CAMMC simultaneously calibrates multiple related model outputs, such as predicted conversion rate, confidence scores, etc.

  2. Confidence-Aware Calibration: CAMMC leverages the model's confidence estimates to guide the calibration process, adjusting outputs based on how certain the model is about its predictions.

  3. Online Calibration: CAMMC performs the calibration in an online fashion, continuously updating the calibration parameters as new data becomes available. This allows the system to adapt to changes in the data distribution over time.

The authors evaluate CAMCC on several real-world online advertising datasets, comparing it to standard calibration techniques like Platt Scaling and Isotonic Regression. They show that CAMCC can significantly improve both calibration performance (as measured by calibration error metrics) as well as downstream task performance (e.g., ad placement optimization).

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a compelling approach for improving the reliability of machine learning models in online advertising applications. The key strengths of the CAMMC method are its ability to leverage multi-field information and confidence estimates, as well as its online adaptation capabilities.

However, the paper does not address several potential limitations and areas for further research:

  1. Computational Complexity: The paper does not discuss the computational overhead of the CAMCC method compared to simpler calibration techniques. As the number of model outputs increases, the complexity of the optimization problem may become prohibitive in real-time applications.

  2. Interpretability: While improved calibration is important, the paper does not explore how the CAMCC calibration process affects the interpretability of the original model outputs. This could be a concern in applications where model transparency is critical.

  3. Adversarial Robustness: The paper does not investigate how CAMCC performs under adversarial attacks, where an adversary may attempt to manipulate the model's confidence estimates. Calibration Attacks: A Comprehensive Study of Adversarial Attacks on Model Calibration suggests this could be an important consideration.

  4. Broader Applicability: While the paper focuses on online advertising, the CAMCC technique may have applications in other domains where reliable probabilistic predictions are crucial, such as Bayesian optimization or language model calibration. Further research is needed to explore these possibilities.

Overall, the CAMCC method represents an important advancement in model calibration, with promising practical applications in online advertising and potentially other high-stakes domains. However, the paper would be strengthened by addressing the limitations mentioned above and exploring the broader implications of this work.

Conclusion

Confidence-Aware Multi-Field Model Calibration (CAMCC) is a novel technique for improving the reliability of machine learning models used in online advertising systems. By simultaneously calibrating multiple model outputs and leveraging confidence information, CAMCC can produce more accurate and well-calibrated predictions that translate to better downstream performance.

The authors' empirical results demonstrate the effectiveness of CAMCC on several real-world datasets, outperforming standard calibration methods. This work represents an important step towards optimizing calibration by gaining aware prediction correctness in high-stakes applications where model reliability is paramount.

While the paper does not address all potential limitations, the CAMCC approach provides a promising direction for further research and development in model calibration. Continued advancements in this area could lead to significant improvements in the trustworthiness and real-world impact of machine learning systems, with far-reaching implications for online advertising and beyond.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Confidence-Aware Multi-Field Model Calibration
Total Score

0

Confidence-Aware Multi-Field Model Calibration

Yuang Zhao, Chuhan Wu, Qinglin Jia, Hong Zhu, Jia Yan, Libin Zong, Linxuan Zhang, Zhenhua Dong, Muyu Zhang

Accurately predicting the probabilities of user feedback, such as clicks and conversions, is critical for advertisement ranking and bidding. However, there often exist unwanted mismatches between predicted probabilities and true likelihoods due to the rapid shift of data distributions and intrinsic model biases. Calibration aims to address this issue by post-processing model predictions, and field-aware calibration can adjust model output on different feature field values to satisfy fine-grained advertising demands. Unfortunately, the observed samples corresponding to certain field values can be seriously limited to make confident calibrations, which may yield bias amplification and online disturbance. In this paper, we propose a confidence-aware multi-field calibration method, which adaptively adjusts the calibration intensity based on confidence levels derived from sample statistics. It also utilizes multiple fields for joint model calibration according to their importance to mitigate the impact of data sparsity on a single field. Extensive offline and online experiments show the superiority of our method in boosting advertising performance and reducing prediction deviations.

Read more

5/22/2024

🎲

Total Score

0

Posterior Probability Matters: Doubly-Adaptive Calibration for Neural Predictions in Online Advertising

Penghui Wei, Weimin Zhang, Ruijie Hou, Jinquan Liu, Shaoguo Liu, Liang Wang, Bo Zheng

Predicting user response probabilities is vital for ad ranking and bidding. We hope that predictive models can produce accurate probabilistic predictions that reflect true likelihoods. Calibration techniques aim to post-process model predictions to posterior probabilities. Field-level calibration -- which performs calibration w.r.t. to a specific field value -- is fine-grained and more practical. In this paper we propose a doubly-adaptive approach AdaCalib. It learns an isotonic function family to calibrate model predictions with the guidance of posterior statistics, and field-adaptive mechanisms are designed to ensure that the posterior is appropriate for the field value to be calibrated. Experiments verify that AdaCalib achieves significant improvement on calibration performance. It has been deployed online and beats previous approach.

Read more

5/28/2024

Deep Ensemble Shape Calibration: Multi-Field Post-hoc Calibration in Online Advertising
Total Score

0

Deep Ensemble Shape Calibration: Multi-Field Post-hoc Calibration in Online Advertising

Shuai Yang, Hao Yang, Zhuang Zou, Linhe Xu, Shuo Yuan, Yifan Zeng

In the e-commerce advertising scenario, estimating the true probabilities (known as a calibrated estimate) on Click-Through Rate (CTR) and Conversion Rate (CVR) is critical. Previous research has introduced numerous solutions for addressing the calibration problem. These methods typically involve the training of calibrators using a validation set and subsequently applying these calibrators to correct the original estimated values during online inference. However, what sets e-commerce advertising scenarios apart is the challenge of multi-field calibration. Multi-field calibration requires achieving calibration in each field. In order to achieve multi-field calibration, it is necessary to have a strong data utilization ability. Because the quantity of pCTR specified range for a single field-value (such as user ID and item ID) sample is relatively small, this makes the calibrator more difficult to train. However, existing methods have difficulty effectively addressing these issues. To solve these problems, we propose a new method named Deep Ensemble Shape Calibration (DESC). In terms of business understanding and interpretability, we decompose multi-field calibration into value calibration and shape calibration. We introduce innovative basis calibration functions, which enhance both function expression capabilities and data utilization by combining these basis calibration functions. A significant advancement lies in the development of an allocator capable of allocating the most suitable calibrators to different estimation error distributions within diverse fields and values. We achieve significant improvements in both public and industrial datasets. In online experiments, we observe a +2.5% increase in CVR and +4.0% in GMV (Gross Merchandise Volume). Our code is now available at: https://github.com/HaoYang0123/DESC.

Read more

5/22/2024

🔮

Total Score

0

Online Calibrated and Conformal Prediction Improves Bayesian Optimization

Shachi Deshpande, Charles Marx, Volodymyr Kuleshov

Accurate uncertainty estimates are important in sequential model-based decision-making tasks such as Bayesian optimization. However, these estimates can be imperfect if the data violates assumptions made by the model (e.g., Gaussianity). This paper studies which uncertainties are needed in model-based decision-making and in Bayesian optimization, and argues that uncertainties can benefit from calibration -- i.e., an 80% predictive interval should contain the true outcome 80% of the time. Maintaining calibration, however, can be challenging when the data is non-stationary and depends on our actions. We propose using simple algorithms based on online learning to provably maintain calibration on non-i.i.d. data, and we show how to integrate these algorithms in Bayesian optimization with minimal overhead. Empirically, we find that calibrated Bayesian optimization converges to better optima in fewer steps, and we demonstrate improved performance on standard benchmark functions and hyperparameter optimization tasks.

Read more

6/27/2024