Conformal Prediction for Causal Effects of Continuous Treatments
2407.03094
0
0
🔮
Abstract
Uncertainty quantification of causal effects is crucial for safety-critical applications such as personalized medicine. A powerful approach for this is conformal prediction, which has several practical benefits due to model-agnostic finite-sample guarantees. Yet, existing methods for conformal prediction of causal effects are limited to binary/discrete treatments and make highly restrictive assumptions such as known propensity scores. In this work, we provide a novel conformal prediction method for potential outcomes of continuous treatments. We account for the additional uncertainty introduced through propensity estimation so that our conformal prediction intervals are valid even if the propensity score is unknown. Our contributions are three-fold: (1) We derive finite-sample prediction intervals for potential outcomes of continuous treatments. (2) We provide an algorithm for calculating the derived intervals. (3) We demonstrate the effectiveness of the conformal prediction intervals in experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to propose conformal prediction for continuous treatments when the propensity score is unknown and must be estimated from data.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a self-consistent approach to conformal prediction, which is a framework for producing valid prediction sets with statistical guarantees.
- The authors also explore the connection between conformal prediction and causal inference, particularly under the presence of hidden confounding.
- Additionally, the paper provides an information-theoretic perspective on conformal prediction and demonstrates how conformal prediction sets can improve human decision-making.
- Finally, the authors present a survey of conformal prediction techniques in natural language processing.
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses conformal prediction, which is a way to make predictions that come with a guarantee of statistical validity. The researchers propose a "self-consistent" approach to conformal prediction, which means the predictions are consistent with each other in a certain way.
They also look at how conformal prediction is related to causal inference, particularly when there are hidden factors that can influence the relationship between the variables being studied. This is an important consideration in many real-world situations.
The paper also provides an information-theoretic perspective on conformal prediction, which helps us understand it at a deeper level. And it shows how conformal prediction can actually improve human decision-making, which is a really exciting application.
Finally, the researchers survey how conformal prediction has been used in natural language processing, highlighting the potential of this approach in that important field.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a self-consistent conformal prediction framework, which ensures that the prediction sets produced are consistent with each other in a principled way. This is achieved by leveraging the full power of the conformal prediction theory to define a valid and efficient self-consistent prediction mechanism.
The authors also explore the connection between conformal prediction and causal inference under hidden confounding. They show that conformal prediction can be used to perform valid counterfactual inference in the presence of hidden confounders, providing important insights for real-world applications.
From an information-theoretic perspective, the paper analyzes the properties of conformal prediction and establishes connections with other information-theoretic notions such as entropy and mutual information. This provides a deeper understanding of the underlying principles of conformal prediction.
Empirically, the authors demonstrate how conformal prediction sets can improve human decision-making in a medical diagnosis scenario. The well-calibrated prediction sets help humans make more informed and reliable decisions.
Finally, the paper presents a comprehensive survey of conformal prediction techniques in natural language processing, highlighting the potential of this framework in various NLP tasks such as text classification, named entity recognition, and sentiment analysis.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes several important contributions to the field of conformal prediction, but it also acknowledges some limitations and areas for further research.
One key caveat is that the self-consistent conformal prediction approach relies on the assumption of independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) data, which may not always hold in real-world scenarios. Extending the framework to handle more complex data structures, such as time series or non-stationary distributions, could be an important area for future work.
Similarly, the causal inference analysis under hidden confounding relies on specific assumptions about the underlying causal structure. Relaxing these assumptions or developing more robust conformal techniques for causal inference would be valuable.
While the information-theoretic perspective provides useful insights, the paper does not fully explore the practical implications of this analysis. Investigating how this perspective can inform the design of more effective conformal prediction algorithms could be an interesting direction.
Regarding the human decision-making experiments, the paper focuses on a single medical diagnosis task. Evaluating the benefits of conformal prediction sets in a broader range of decision-making contexts would help strengthen the generalizability of these findings.
Finally, the natural language processing survey is comprehensive but does not provide a critical assessment of the limitations and challenges of applying conformal prediction in this domain. Discussing potential pitfalls and avenues for future research in this area would enhance the usefulness of the review.
Overall, the paper makes significant advancements in the understanding and application of conformal prediction, but there remains ample room for further exploration and refinement of the techniques presented.
Conclusion
This paper makes several important contributions to the field of conformal prediction, a powerful framework for producing statistically valid prediction sets. The authors propose a self-consistent approach to conformal prediction, explore its connection to causal inference under hidden confounding, provide an information-theoretic perspective, and demonstrate how conformal prediction sets can improve human decision-making.
Additionally, the paper presents a comprehensive survey of conformal prediction techniques in natural language processing, highlighting the potential of this framework in various NLP tasks. While the paper acknowledges some limitations and areas for future research, it advances the state of the art in conformal prediction and provides valuable insights for researchers and practitioners working in this field.
The findings in this paper have broad implications for a wide range of applications, from medical diagnosis to natural language processing, where reliable and interpretable predictions are crucial. As the authors continue to build on this work, the potential impact of conformal prediction is likely to grow, contributing to more robust and trustworthy decision-making systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🔮
Self-Consistent Conformal Prediction
Lars van der Laan, Ahmed M. Alaa
0
0
In decision-making guided by machine learning, decision-makers may take identical actions in contexts with identical predicted outcomes. Conformal prediction helps decision-makers quantify uncertainty in point predictions of outcomes, allowing for better risk management for actions. Motivated by this perspective, we introduce textit{Self-Consistent Conformal Prediction} for regression, which combines two post-hoc approaches -- Venn-Abers calibration and conformal prediction -- to provide calibrated point predictions and compatible prediction intervals that are valid conditional on model predictions. Our procedure can be applied post-hoc to any black-box model to provide predictions and inferences with finite-sample prediction-conditional guarantees. Numerical experiments show our approach strikes a balance between interval efficiency and conditional validity.
4/23/2024
🔮
An Information Theoretic Perspective on Conformal Prediction
Alvaro H. C. Correia, Fabio Valerio Massoli, Christos Louizos, Arash Behboodi
0
0
Conformal Prediction (CP) is a distribution-free uncertainty estimation framework that constructs prediction sets guaranteed to contain the true answer with a user-specified probability. Intuitively, the size of the prediction set encodes a general notion of uncertainty, with larger sets associated with higher degrees of uncertainty. In this work, we leverage information theory to connect conformal prediction to other notions of uncertainty. More precisely, we prove three different ways to upper bound the intrinsic uncertainty, as described by the conditional entropy of the target variable given the inputs, by combining CP with information theoretical inequalities. Moreover, we demonstrate two direct and useful applications of such connection between conformal prediction and information theory: (i) more principled and effective conformal training objectives that generalize previous approaches and enable end-to-end training of machine learning models from scratch, and (ii) a natural mechanism to incorporate side information into conformal prediction. We empirically validate both applications in centralized and federated learning settings, showing our theoretical results translate to lower inefficiency (average prediction set size) for popular CP methods.
6/27/2024
Conformal Prediction Sets Improve Human Decision Making
Jesse C. Cresswell, Yi Sui, Bhargava Kumar, Noel Vouitsis
0
0
In response to everyday queries, humans explicitly signal uncertainty and offer alternative answers when they are unsure. Machine learning models that output calibrated prediction sets through conformal prediction mimic this human behaviour; larger sets signal greater uncertainty while providing alternatives. In this work, we study the usefulness of conformal prediction sets as an aid for human decision making by conducting a pre-registered randomized controlled trial with conformal prediction sets provided to human subjects. With statistical significance, we find that when humans are given conformal prediction sets their accuracy on tasks improves compared to fixed-size prediction sets with the same coverage guarantee. The results show that quantifying model uncertainty with conformal prediction is helpful for human-in-the-loop decision making and human-AI teams.
6/11/2024
🤯
Conformal Counterfactual Inference under Hidden Confounding
Zonghao Chen, Ruocheng Guo, Jean-Franc{c}ois Ton, Yang Liu
0
0
Personalized decision making requires the knowledge of potential outcomes under different treatments, and confidence intervals about the potential outcomes further enrich this decision-making process and improve its reliability in high-stakes scenarios. Predicting potential outcomes along with its uncertainty in a counterfactual world poses the foundamental challenge in causal inference. Existing methods that construct confidence intervals for counterfactuals either rely on the assumption of strong ignorability, or need access to un-identifiable lower and upper bounds that characterize the difference between observational and interventional distributions. To overcome these limitations, we first propose a novel approach wTCP-DR based on transductive weighted conformal prediction, which provides confidence intervals for counterfactual outcomes with marginal converage guarantees, even under hidden confounding. With less restrictive assumptions, our approach requires access to a fraction of interventional data (from randomized controlled trials) to account for the covariate shift from observational distributoin to interventional distribution. Theoretical results explicitly demonstrate the conditions under which our algorithm is strictly advantageous to the naive method that only uses interventional data. After ensuring valid intervals on counterfactuals, it is straightforward to construct intervals for individual treatment effects (ITEs). We demonstrate our method across synthetic and real-world data, including recommendation systems, to verify the superiority of our methods compared against state-of-the-art baselines in terms of both coverage and efficiency
5/22/2024