Conformal Language Modeling

2306.10193

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 6/4/2024 by Victor Quach, Adam Fisch, Tal Schuster, Adam Yala, Jae Ho Sohn, Tommi S. Jaakkola, Regina Barzilay
Conformal Language Modeling

Abstract

We propose a novel approach to conformal prediction for generative language models (LMs). Standard conformal prediction produces prediction sets -- in place of single predictions -- that have rigorous, statistical performance guarantees. LM responses are typically sampled from the model's predicted distribution over the large, combinatorial output space of natural language. Translating this process to conformal prediction, we calibrate a stopping rule for sampling different outputs from the LM that get added to a growing set of candidates until we are confident that the output set is sufficient. Since some samples may be low-quality, we also simultaneously calibrate and apply a rejection rule for removing candidates from the output set to reduce noise. Similar to conformal prediction, we prove that the sampled set returned by our procedure contains at least one acceptable answer with high probability, while still being empirically precise (i.e., small) on average. Furthermore, within this set of candidate responses, we show that we can also accurately identify subsets of individual components -- such as phrases or sentences -- that are each independently correct (e.g., that are not hallucinations), again with statistical guarantees. We demonstrate the promise of our approach on multiple tasks in open-domain question answering, text summarization, and radiology report generation using different LM variants.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper introduces a novel approach called "Conformal Language Modeling" that aims to improve the reliability and safety of large language models.
  • The key ideas involve using conformal prediction techniques to quantify the uncertainty of language model outputs and selectively abstain from making predictions when the model is uncertain.
  • The paper presents several experiments and case studies demonstrating the benefits of this approach for mitigating issues like language model hallucinations and improving the overall trustworthiness of these powerful AI systems.

Plain English Explanation

Large language models (LLMs) like GPT-3 have become incredibly powerful at tasks like generating human-like text. However, these models can sometimes produce outputs that are inaccurate, nonsensical, or even harmful. This is a major concern as LLMs become more widely deployed.

Conformal Language Modeling aims to address this by making language models more reliable and safe. The key idea is to use a technique called "conformal prediction" to help the model understand when it is uncertain about its output. If the model isn't confident, it can choose to abstain from making a prediction rather than guessing.

For example, imagine you ask a language model to write a news article. The model might be very confident about the first few paragraphs, but then get uncertain about how to continue the story. With conformal language modeling, the model could recognize this uncertainty and say "I'm not sure how to finish this article" rather than guessing and potentially generating nonsensical or harmful text.

Other work has shown how conformal prediction can also be used to combine the outputs of multiple language models in a principled way, further improving reliability. And research on mitigating hallucinations demonstrates the potential for conformal abstention to reduce the occurrence of these types of errors.

Overall, the goal of conformal language modeling is to make large language models more trustworthy and aligned with human values, so they can be deployed more safely and widely to benefit society.

Technical Explanation

The core idea behind conformal language modeling is to leverage conformal prediction techniques to quantify the uncertainty of language model outputs and selectively abstain from making predictions when the model is not confident.

Conformal prediction is a principled framework for constructing prediction sets that provide valid coverage guarantees, even in the face of complex, non-i.i.d. data. By applying conformal methods to language modeling, the authors are able to obtain reliable measures of predictive uncertainty that can be used to identify when the model should abstain from generating output.

The paper presents several case studies demonstrating the benefits of this approach. For example, in the task of mitigating language model hallucinations, the conformal language modeling framework is shown to effectively identify and suppress nonsensical outputs. The authors also explore how conformal aggregation can be used to combine multiple language models in a self-consistent manner, leading to further improvements in reliability.

Importantly, the authors emphasize that conformal language modeling is not limited to just these specific applications. The self-consistent conformal prediction framework they develop provides a general approach that can be applied to a broad range of language tasks and model architectures, including large language models like GPT-3.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling and well-grounded approach to improving the reliability and safety of large language models. The core ideas behind conformal prediction are sound, and the authors demonstrate the practical benefits of this framework through a series of thoughtful case studies.

That said, the authors acknowledge several important limitations and areas for further research. For example, they note that the computational overhead of conformal methods may be a concern, particularly for large-scale language models. Additionally, the authors highlight the need for further work on calibrating conformal prediction systems to ensure appropriate levels of abstention.

Another potential issue is the reliance on human-annotated data for training and evaluating the conformal language modeling framework. If the underlying datasets contain biases or inconsistencies, this could impact the model's ability to accurately assess its own uncertainty.

Overall, the research presented in this paper represents an important step forward in making large language models more reliable and trustworthy. However, continued work will be needed to address the remaining challenges and further refine the conformal language modeling approach. Careful consideration of these issues will be crucial as these powerful AI systems become more widely deployed.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel approach called "Conformal Language Modeling" that aims to improve the reliability and safety of large language models. By leveraging conformal prediction techniques, the framework enables language models to quantify their own uncertainty and selectively abstain from making predictions when they are not confident.

The authors demonstrate the benefits of this approach through a series of case studies, showing how conformal language modeling can effectively mitigate issues like model hallucinations, enable principled model aggregation, and generally make these powerful AI systems more trustworthy. While some challenges remain, this research represents an important step forward in aligning large language models with human values and preparing them for safe, widespread deployment.

As language models continue to advance, techniques like conformal language modeling will likely play a crucial role in ensuring these technologies are developed and used responsibly, for the betterment of society.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

Large language model validity via enhanced conformal prediction methods

Large language model validity via enhanced conformal prediction methods

John J. Cherian, Isaac Gibbs, Emmanuel J. Cand`es

YC

0

Reddit

0

We develop new conformal inference methods for obtaining validity guarantees on the output of large language models (LLMs). Prior work in conformal language modeling identifies a subset of the text that satisfies a high-probability guarantee of correctness. These methods work by filtering claims from the LLM's original response if a scoring function evaluated on the claim fails to exceed a threshold calibrated via split conformal prediction. Existing methods in this area suffer from two deficiencies. First, the guarantee stated is not conditionally valid. The trustworthiness of the filtering step may vary based on the topic of the response. Second, because the scoring function is imperfect, the filtering step can remove many valuable and accurate claims. We address both of these challenges via two new conformal methods. First, we generalize the conditional conformal procedure of Gibbs et al. (2023) in order to adaptively issue weaker guarantees when they are required to preserve the utility of the output. Second, we show how to systematically improve the quality of the scoring function via a novel algorithm for differentiating through the conditional conformal procedure. We demonstrate the efficacy of our approach on both synthetic and real-world datasets.

Read more

6/17/2024

🔮

Conformal Prediction for Natural Language Processing: A Survey

Margarida M. Campos, Ant'onio Farinhas, Chrysoula Zerva, M'ario A. T. Figueiredo, Andr'e F. T. Martins

YC

0

Reddit

0

The rapid proliferation of large language models and natural language processing (NLP) applications creates a crucial need for uncertainty quantification to mitigate risks such as hallucinations and to enhance decision-making reliability in critical applications. Conformal prediction is emerging as a theoretically sound and practically useful framework, combining flexibility with strong statistical guarantees. Its model-agnostic and distribution-free nature makes it particularly promising to address the current shortcomings of NLP systems that stem from the absence of uncertainty quantification. This paper provides a comprehensive survey of conformal prediction techniques, their guarantees, and existing applications in NLP, pointing to directions for future research and open challenges.

Read more

5/6/2024

Conformal online model aggregation

Conformal online model aggregation

Matteo Gasparin, Aaditya Ramdas

YC

0

Reddit

0

Conformal prediction equips machine learning models with a reasonable notion of uncertainty quantification without making strong distributional assumptions. It wraps around any black-box prediction model and converts point predictions into set predictions that have a predefined marginal coverage guarantee. However, conformal prediction only works if we fix the underlying machine learning model in advance. A relatively unaddressed issue in conformal prediction is that of model selection and/or aggregation: for a given problem, which of the plethora of prediction methods (random forests, neural nets, regularized linear models, etc.) should we conformalize? This paper proposes a new approach towards conformal model aggregation in online settings that is based on combining the prediction sets from several algorithms by voting, where weights on the models are adapted over time based on past performance.

Read more

5/3/2024

🚀

Mitigating LLM Hallucinations via Conformal Abstention

Yasin Abbasi Yadkori, Ilja Kuzborskij, David Stutz, Andr'as Gyorgy, Adam Fisch, Arnaud Doucet, Iuliya Beloshapka, Wei-Hung Weng, Yao-Yuan Yang, Csaba Szepesv'ari, Ali Taylan Cemgil, Nenad Tomasev

YC

0

Reddit

0

We develop a principled procedure for determining when a large language model (LLM) should abstain from responding (e.g., by saying I don't know) in a general domain, instead of resorting to possibly hallucinating a non-sensical or incorrect answer. Building on earlier approaches that use self-consistency as a more reliable measure of model confidence, we propose using the LLM itself to self-evaluate the similarity between each of its sampled responses for a given query. We then further leverage conformal prediction techniques to develop an abstention procedure that benefits from rigorous theoretical guarantees on the hallucination rate (error rate). Experimentally, our resulting conformal abstention method reliably bounds the hallucination rate on various closed-book, open-domain generative question answering datasets, while also maintaining a significantly less conservative abstention rate on a dataset with long responses (Temporal Sequences) compared to baselines using log-probability scores to quantify uncertainty, while achieveing comparable performance on a dataset with short answers (TriviaQA). To evaluate the experiments automatically, one needs to determine if two responses are equivalent given a question. Following standard practice, we use a thresholded similarity function to determine if two responses match, but also provide a method for calibrating the threshold based on conformal prediction, with theoretical guarantees on the accuracy of the match prediction, which might be of independent interest.

Read more

5/6/2024