Large language model validity via enhanced conformal prediction methods
2406.09714
0
0
Abstract
We develop new conformal inference methods for obtaining validity guarantees on the output of large language models (LLMs). Prior work in conformal language modeling identifies a subset of the text that satisfies a high-probability guarantee of correctness. These methods work by filtering claims from the LLM's original response if a scoring function evaluated on the claim fails to exceed a threshold calibrated via split conformal prediction. Existing methods in this area suffer from two deficiencies. First, the guarantee stated is not conditionally valid. The trustworthiness of the filtering step may vary based on the topic of the response. Second, because the scoring function is imperfect, the filtering step can remove many valuable and accurate claims. We address both of these challenges via two new conformal methods. First, we generalize the conditional conformal procedure of Gibbs et al. (2023) in order to adaptively issue weaker guarantees when they are required to preserve the utility of the output. Second, we show how to systematically improve the quality of the scoring function via a novel algorithm for differentiating through the conditional conformal procedure. We demonstrate the efficacy of our approach on both synthetic and real-world datasets.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores methods for evaluating the validity and reliability of large language models, which are AI systems trained on vast amounts of text data to generate human-like language.
- The researchers propose enhanced conformal prediction as a way to provide rigorous statistical guarantees about the accuracy and trustworthiness of language model outputs.
- The paper demonstrates how conformal prediction can be used to quantify the uncertainty of language model predictions, even on out-of-distribution inputs, and to flag potentially unreliable outputs.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models like GPT-3 and BERT have shown impressive abilities to generate human-like text, answer questions, and perform various language tasks. However, it can be difficult to know how much we can trust the outputs of these complex AI systems, especially when they are deployed in high-stakes applications.
The researchers in this paper introduce a technique called conformal prediction that can help quantify the uncertainty and reliability of language model predictions. Conformal prediction works by comparing a model's output to a reference set of "conforming" examples, and then using statistical techniques to determine whether the new prediction is likely to be accurate or not.
By incorporating conformal prediction into the language modeling process, the researchers show that it's possible to flag outputs that the model is not confident about, or that may be outside the distribution of data the model was trained on. This allows users to better understand the limitations of the language model and make more informed decisions about when to trust its outputs.
The researchers demonstrate the benefits of this approach through several experiments, showing that conformal prediction can improve the reliability and transparency of language models in a range of tasks, from question answering to text generation. This work has important implications for the responsible development and deployment of large language models in real-world applications.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a framework for incorporating conformal prediction into the training and evaluation of large language models. Conformal prediction is a statistical technique that can provide rigorous, distribution-agnostic validity guarantees for machine learning models, even on out-of-distribution inputs.
The key idea is to train a language model as usual, but then use conformal prediction to assess the uncertainty and reliability of the model's outputs. This involves comparing the model's predictions to a reference set of "conforming" examples, and then using statistical tests to determine whether a new prediction is likely to be accurate or not.
The researchers explore several enhancements to the basic conformal prediction framework, including:
- Leveraging learned representations from the language model to improve the efficiency and accuracy of the conformity assessments.
- Developing specialized conformal prediction techniques for language modeling tasks like text generation and question answering.
- Demonstrating how conformal prediction can be used to filter out unreliable model outputs, improving the trustworthiness of language model deployments.
Through extensive experiments on benchmark language tasks, the researchers show that their enhanced conformal prediction approach can provide meaningful validity guarantees, while maintaining competitive task performance. This suggests that conformal prediction could be a valuable tool for improving the reliability and transparency of large language models in real-world applications.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a thorough and technically rigorous approach to enhancing the validity and reliability of large language models using conformal prediction. The researchers have made a number of important contributions, including developing specialized conformal prediction techniques for language tasks and demonstrating the benefits of this approach through extensive experiments.
That said, there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research that could be explored:
- The paper focuses on offline evaluations of language model reliability, but it would be interesting to see how the proposed techniques perform in online, real-world deployments where the input distribution may be more dynamic and unpredictable.
- The experiments are primarily conducted on standard NLP benchmarks, so it would be valuable to assess the approach on more diverse and challenging language tasks, including those involving multilingual or multimodal inputs.
- While the conformal prediction framework provides statistical validity guarantees, there may still be concerns around the interpretability and explainability of the model's outputs, which is an important consideration for high-stakes applications.
Overall, this work represents an important step forward in improving the trustworthiness and transparency of large language models, and the techniques presented could have significant implications for the responsible development and deployment of these powerful AI systems.
Conclusion
This paper introduces an enhanced conformal prediction framework for quantifying the validity and reliability of large language models. By incorporating conformal prediction into the language modeling process, the researchers demonstrate that it is possible to provide rigorous statistical guarantees about the accuracy and trustworthiness of model outputs, even on out-of-distribution inputs.
The proposed techniques have the potential to improve the responsible development and deployment of large language models, by allowing users to better understand the limitations of these powerful AI systems and make more informed decisions about when to trust their outputs. As language models continue to advance and be applied in high-stakes domains, approaches like the one presented in this paper will become increasingly important for ensuring the safety and reliability of these technologies.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Conformal Language Modeling
Victor Quach, Adam Fisch, Tal Schuster, Adam Yala, Jae Ho Sohn, Tommi S. Jaakkola, Regina Barzilay
0
0
We propose a novel approach to conformal prediction for generative language models (LMs). Standard conformal prediction produces prediction sets -- in place of single predictions -- that have rigorous, statistical performance guarantees. LM responses are typically sampled from the model's predicted distribution over the large, combinatorial output space of natural language. Translating this process to conformal prediction, we calibrate a stopping rule for sampling different outputs from the LM that get added to a growing set of candidates until we are confident that the output set is sufficient. Since some samples may be low-quality, we also simultaneously calibrate and apply a rejection rule for removing candidates from the output set to reduce noise. Similar to conformal prediction, we prove that the sampled set returned by our procedure contains at least one acceptable answer with high probability, while still being empirically precise (i.e., small) on average. Furthermore, within this set of candidate responses, we show that we can also accurately identify subsets of individual components -- such as phrases or sentences -- that are each independently correct (e.g., that are not hallucinations), again with statistical guarantees. We demonstrate the promise of our approach on multiple tasks in open-domain question answering, text summarization, and radiology report generation using different LM variants.
6/4/2024
Conformal Validity Guarantees Exist for Any Data Distribution
Drew Prinster, Samuel Stanton, Anqi Liu, Suchi Saria
0
0
As artificial intelligence (AI) / machine learning (ML) gain widespread adoption, practitioners are increasingly seeking means to quantify and control the risk these systems incur. This challenge is especially salient when such systems have autonomy to collect their own data, such as in black-box optimization and active learning, where their actions induce sequential feedback-loop shifts in the data distribution. Conformal prediction is a promising approach to uncertainty and risk quantification, but prior variants' validity guarantees have assumed some form of ``quasi-exchangeability'' on the data distribution, thereby excluding many types of sequential shifts. In this paper we prove that conformal prediction can theoretically be extended to textit{any} joint data distribution, not just exchangeable or quasi-exchangeable ones. Although the most general case is exceedingly impractical to compute, for concrete practical applications we outline a procedure for deriving specific conformal algorithms for any data distribution, and we use this procedure to derive tractable algorithms for a series of AI/ML-agent-induced covariate shifts. We evaluate the proposed algorithms empirically on synthetic black-box optimization and active learning tasks.
6/6/2024
🔮
Conformal Prediction for Natural Language Processing: A Survey
Margarida M. Campos, Ant'onio Farinhas, Chrysoula Zerva, M'ario A. T. Figueiredo, Andr'e F. T. Martins
0
0
The rapid proliferation of large language models and natural language processing (NLP) applications creates a crucial need for uncertainty quantification to mitigate risks such as hallucinations and to enhance decision-making reliability in critical applications. Conformal prediction is emerging as a theoretically sound and practically useful framework, combining flexibility with strong statistical guarantees. Its model-agnostic and distribution-free nature makes it particularly promising to address the current shortcomings of NLP systems that stem from the absence of uncertainty quantification. This paper provides a comprehensive survey of conformal prediction techniques, their guarantees, and existing applications in NLP, pointing to directions for future research and open challenges.
5/6/2024
Conformal online model aggregation
Matteo Gasparin, Aaditya Ramdas
0
0
Conformal prediction equips machine learning models with a reasonable notion of uncertainty quantification without making strong distributional assumptions. It wraps around any black-box prediction model and converts point predictions into set predictions that have a predefined marginal coverage guarantee. However, conformal prediction only works if we fix the underlying machine learning model in advance. A relatively unaddressed issue in conformal prediction is that of model selection and/or aggregation: for a given problem, which of the plethora of prediction methods (random forests, neural nets, regularized linear models, etc.) should we conformalize? This paper proposes a new approach towards conformal model aggregation in online settings that is based on combining the prediction sets from several algorithms by voting, where weights on the models are adapted over time based on past performance.
5/3/2024