Conformal Semantic Image Segmentation: Post-hoc Quantification of Predictive Uncertainty
2405.05145
0
0
🖼️
Abstract
We propose a post-hoc, computationally lightweight method to quantify predictive uncertainty in semantic image segmentation. Our approach uses conformal prediction to generate statistically valid prediction sets that are guaranteed to include the ground-truth segmentation mask at a predefined confidence level. We introduce a novel visualization technique of conformalized predictions based on heatmaps, and provide metrics to assess their empirical validity. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach on well-known benchmark datasets and image segmentation prediction models, and conclude with practical insights.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a new method to quantify predictive uncertainty in semantic image segmentation models.
- The approach uses conformal prediction to generate statistically valid prediction sets that are guaranteed to include the ground-truth segmentation mask at a predefined confidence level.
- The authors introduce a novel visualization technique for conformalized predictions based on heatmaps, and provide metrics to assess their empirical validity.
- The effectiveness of the method is demonstrated on well-known benchmark datasets and image segmentation prediction models.
Plain English Explanation
Image segmentation is the process of dividing an image into distinct regions or objects. This is an important task in computer vision with many applications, such as autonomous driving, medical imaging, and image analysis. However, existing segmentation models often struggle to provide reliable estimates of their own uncertainty - how confident they are in their predictions.
The authors of this paper propose a new technique to address this issue. Their approach uses conformal prediction, a statistical method that generates prediction sets guaranteed to contain the true segmentation mask with a predefined level of confidence. This means the model not only provides a segmentation, but also quantifies how likely that segmentation is to be correct.
To make these prediction sets more interpretable, the authors introduce a novel visualization technique using heatmaps. These heatmaps show which parts of the image the model is most confident about, and which parts are more uncertain. The authors also provide metrics to evaluate the empirical validity of these conformalized predictions.
By applying their method to well-known image segmentation benchmarks and models, the authors demonstrate that it can effectively quantify predictive uncertainty. This has important practical implications, as it allows users to better understand the limitations of segmentation models and make more informed decisions based on their outputs.
Technical Explanation
The key innovation in this paper is the use of conformal prediction to generate statistically valid prediction sets for semantic image segmentation. Conformal prediction is a framework that provides guarantees on the coverage of the true output, even for complex machine learning models.
The authors first train a base segmentation model using standard techniques. They then use conformal prediction to construct prediction sets - collections of possible segmentation masks - that are guaranteed to contain the ground-truth mask with a predefined confidence level (e.g., 95%). This is achieved by computing nonconformity scores that measure how "unusual" each candidate segmentation is compared to the training data.
To make these prediction sets more interpretable, the authors introduce a novel visualization technique. They create heatmaps that indicate the level of confidence the model has in each pixel of the segmentation. Regions with high confidence are shown in warm colors, while more uncertain areas are represented in cooler colors.
The authors also propose new metrics to assess the empirical validity of the conformalized predictions. These metrics evaluate properties such as the calibration (how well the confidence levels match the true coverage) and sharpness (how tight the prediction sets are) of the method.
Through experiments on well-known benchmarks like Cityscapes and PASCAL VOC, the authors demonstrate that their approach can effectively quantify predictive uncertainty in semantic segmentation models. They also show that the conformalized predictions outperform standard uncertainty estimates, such as model softmax outputs, in terms of validity and informativeness.
Critical Analysis
The proposed method offers a principled and statistically rigorous approach to uncertainty quantification in semantic image segmentation, which is an important and challenging problem. The use of conformal prediction provides strong guarantees on the coverage of the true segmentation mask, addressing a key limitation of existing uncertainty estimation techniques.
However, the authors acknowledge that their method is computationally more expensive than simply using model softmax outputs as uncertainty estimates. This could be a drawback in real-time applications, where inference speed is critical. The authors suggest that further research is needed to develop more efficient conformal prediction algorithms for this domain.
Additionally, the paper does not explore the potential impact of the conformalized predictions on downstream tasks or decision-making processes. It would be valuable to investigate how users might leverage the uncertainty information provided by the method, and whether it leads to improved performance or more robust decision-making in practical applications, such as medical image reconstruction or autonomous driving.
Overall, the research presented in this paper represents an important contribution to the field of uncertainty quantification in computer vision. The authors have developed a novel and theoretically grounded approach that addresses a significant limitation of existing segmentation models. Further research to improve the efficiency and real-world applicability of the method could help unlock its full potential.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a post-hoc, computationally lightweight method to quantify predictive uncertainty in semantic image segmentation. By leveraging conformal prediction, the authors are able to generate statistically valid prediction sets that are guaranteed to include the ground-truth segmentation mask at a predefined confidence level.
The authors also propose a novel visualization technique based on heatmaps, which helps make the conformalized predictions more interpretable. Additionally, they provide new metrics to assess the empirical validity of the uncertainty estimates.
The effectiveness of the proposed approach is demonstrated on well-known benchmark datasets and image segmentation models. This research represents an important contribution to the field, as it addresses a key limitation of existing segmentation models - the lack of reliable uncertainty estimates. By providing users with a better understanding of model limitations, this method has the potential to improve decision-making in a wide range of computer vision applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Task-Driven Uncertainty Quantification in Inverse Problems via Conformal Prediction
Jeffrey Wen, Rizwan Ahmad, Philip Schniter
0
0
In imaging inverse problems, one seeks to recover an image from missing/corrupted measurements. Because such problems are ill-posed, there is great motivation to quantify the uncertainty induced by the measurement-and-recovery process. Motivated by applications where the recovered image is used for a downstream task, such as soft-output classification, we propose a task-centered approach to uncertainty quantification. In particular, we use conformal prediction to construct an interval that is guaranteed to contain the task output from the true image up to a user-specified probability, and we use the width of that interval to quantify the uncertainty contributed by measurement-and-recovery. For posterior-sampling-based image recovery, we construct locally adaptive prediction intervals. Furthermore, we propose to collect measurements over multiple rounds, stopping as soon as the task uncertainty falls below an acceptable level. We demonstrate our methodology on accelerated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
5/30/2024
🔮
Selective Prediction for Semantic Segmentation using Post-Hoc Confidence Estimation and Its Performance under Distribution Shift
Bruno Laboissiere Camargos Borges, Bruno Machado Pacheco, Danilo Silva
0
0
Semantic segmentation plays a crucial role in various computer vision applications, yet its efficacy is often hindered by the lack of high-quality labeled data. To address this challenge, a common strategy is to leverage models trained on data from different populations, such as publicly available datasets. This approach, however, leads to the distribution shift problem, presenting a reduced performance on the population of interest. In scenarios where model errors can have significant consequences, selective prediction methods offer a means to mitigate risks and reduce reliance on expert supervision. This paper investigates selective prediction for semantic segmentation in low-resource settings, thus focusing on post-hoc confidence estimators applied to pre-trained models operating under distribution shift. We propose a novel image-level confidence measure tailored for semantic segmentation and demonstrate its effectiveness through experiments on three medical imaging tasks. Our findings show that post-hoc confidence estimators offer a cost-effective approach to reducing the impacts of distribution shift.
5/8/2024
🔮
A comparative study of conformal prediction methods for valid uncertainty quantification in machine learning
Nicolas Dewolf
0
0
In the past decades, most work in the area of data analysis and machine learning was focused on optimizing predictive models and getting better results than what was possible with existing models. To what extent the metrics with which such improvements were measured were accurately capturing the intended goal, whether the numerical differences in the resulting values were significant, or whether uncertainty played a role in this study and if it should have been taken into account, was of secondary importance. Whereas probability theory, be it frequentist or Bayesian, used to be the gold standard in science before the advent of the supercomputer, it was quickly replaced in favor of black box models and sheer computing power because of their ability to handle large data sets. This evolution sadly happened at the expense of interpretability and trustworthiness. However, while people are still trying to improve the predictive power of their models, the community is starting to realize that for many applications it is not so much the exact prediction that is of importance, but rather the variability or uncertainty. The work in this dissertation tries to further the quest for a world where everyone is aware of uncertainty, of how important it is and how to embrace it instead of fearing it. A specific, though general, framework that allows anyone to obtain accurate uncertainty estimates is singled out and analysed. Certain aspects and applications of the framework -- dubbed `conformal prediction' -- are studied in detail. Whereas many approaches to uncertainty quantification make strong assumptions about the data, conformal prediction is, at the time of writing, the only framework that deserves the title `distribution-free'. No parametric assumptions have to be made and the nonparametric results also hold without having to resort to the law of large numbers in the asymptotic regime.
5/6/2024
Uncertainty Quantification for Neurosymbolic Programs via Compositional Conformal Prediction
Ramya Ramalingam, Sangdon Park, Osbert Bastani
0
0
Machine learning has become an effective tool for automatically annotating unstructured data (e.g., images) with structured labels (e.g., object detections). As a result, a new programming paradigm called neurosymbolic programming has emerged where users write queries against these predicted annotations. However, due to the intrinsic fallibility of machine learning models, these programs currently lack any notion of correctness. In many domains, users may want some kind of conservative guarantee that the results of their queries contain all possibly relevant instances. Conformal prediction has emerged as a promising strategy for quantifying uncertainty in machine learning by modifying models to predict sets of labels instead of individual labels; it provides a probabilistic guarantee that the prediction set contains the true label with high probability. We propose a novel framework for adapting conformal prediction to neurosymbolic programs; our strategy is to represent prediction sets as abstract values in some abstract domain, and then to use abstract interpretation to propagate prediction sets through the program. Our strategy satisfies three key desiderata: (i) correctness (i.e., the program outputs a prediction set that contains the true output with high probability), (ii) compositionality (i.e., we can quantify uncertainty separately for different modules and then compose them together), and (iii) structured values (i.e., we can provide uncertainty quantification for structured values such as lists). When the full program is available ahead-of-time, we propose an optimization that incorporates conformal prediction at intermediate program points to reduce imprecision in abstract interpretation. We evaluate our approach on programs that take MNIST and MS-COCO images as input, demonstrating that it produces reasonably sized prediction sets while satisfying a coverage guarantee.
5/28/2024