Metric-guided Image Reconstruction Bounds via Conformal Prediction
2404.15274
0
0
🖼️
Abstract
Recent advancements in machine learning have led to novel imaging systems and algorithms that address ill-posed problems. Assessing their trustworthiness and understanding how to deploy them safely at test time remains an important and open problem. We propose a method that leverages conformal prediction to retrieve upper/lower bounds and statistical inliers/outliers of reconstructions based on the prediction intervals of downstream metrics. We apply our method to sparse-view CT for downstream radiotherapy planning and show 1) that metric-guided bounds have valid coverage for downstream metrics while conventional pixel-wise bounds do not and 2) anatomical differences of upper/lower bounds between metric-guided and pixel-wise methods. Our work paves the way for more meaningful reconstruction bounds. Code available at https://github.com/matthewyccheung/conformal-metric
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Recent advancements in machine learning have led to novel imaging systems and algorithms that address challenging problems.
- Assessing the trustworthiness and safe deployment of these systems at test time remains an important and open problem.
- The researchers propose a method that uses conformal prediction to retrieve bounds and identify statistical inliers/outliers of reconstructions based on downstream metric prediction intervals.
- They apply this method to sparse-view CT for radiotherapy planning and demonstrate the benefits compared to conventional pixel-wise bounds.
Plain English Explanation
Machine learning has enabled the development of new imaging systems and techniques that can tackle complex problems. However, figuring out how reliable and safe these systems are when used in real-world applications is an ongoing challenge.
The researchers propose a method that uses a statistical technique called conformal prediction to get upper and lower bounds on the quality of image reconstructions. It can also identify reconstructions that are statistical outliers, meaning they are very different from the majority of results.
They tested this method on CT scans used for planning radiotherapy treatments. Compared to traditional approaches, their method provided bounds that were more accurate and meaningful for the downstream medical task. This means doctors can better understand the uncertainty and potential issues with the reconstructed images.
Overall, the researchers' work helps pave the way for using machine learning imaging systems more safely and reliably, particularly in high-stakes applications like healthcare.
Technical Explanation
The researchers leverage conformal prediction to retrieve upper/lower bounds and identify statistical inliers/outliers of image reconstructions based on the prediction intervals of downstream metrics.
They apply this approach to sparse-view CT imaging for radiotherapy planning. Sparse-view CT uses fewer X-ray measurements than standard CT, which can lead to artifacts and quality issues in the reconstructed images. The researchers show that their metric-guided conformal prediction approach:
- Provides bounds on downstream radiotherapy planning metrics that have valid statistical coverage, unlike conventional pixel-wise bounds.
- Reveals anatomical differences between the upper/lower bounds of their metric-guided method and the pixel-wise approach.
This allows doctors to better understand the uncertainty and potential issues with the sparse-view CT reconstructions when used for treatment planning, compared to existing techniques.
The researchers build on prior work on perceptual metrics for medical image translation and prior-guided diffusion models for limited-angle CT to develop their conformal prediction framework for sparse-view CT.
Critical Analysis
The researchers acknowledge several caveats and limitations in their work. First, their method relies on having access to a validation set that is representative of the test data, which may not always be the case in practice.
Additionally, the performance of their approach depends on the choice of downstream metric used to guide the conformal prediction. The authors suggest exploring multimodal metrics as a potential avenue for future research.
While the results on sparse-view CT reconstruction are promising, it remains to be seen how well the conformal prediction framework would generalize to other imaging modalities and applications beyond radiotherapy planning. Further research is needed to validate the broader applicability of this technique.
Conclusion
The researchers present a novel conformal prediction-based method for assessing the trustworthiness of machine learning-driven imaging systems. By providing meaningful bounds and identifying statistical outliers for downstream task metrics, their approach can help enable the safe and reliable deployment of these systems, particularly in high-stakes domains like healthcare.
Their work on sparse-view CT reconstruction for radiotherapy planning demonstrates the benefits of this technique compared to conventional pixel-wise uncertainty quantification. This paves the way for more principled ways to understand and communicate the uncertainties inherent in advanced imaging algorithms, which is crucial as machine learning continues to transform medical imaging and other critical applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Task-Driven Uncertainty Quantification in Inverse Problems via Conformal Prediction
Jeffrey Wen, Rizwan Ahmad, Philip Schniter
0
0
In imaging inverse problems, one seeks to recover an image from missing/corrupted measurements. Because such problems are ill-posed, there is great motivation to quantify the uncertainty induced by the measurement-and-recovery process. Motivated by applications where the recovered image is used for a downstream task, such as soft-output classification, we propose a task-centered approach to uncertainty quantification. In particular, we use conformal prediction to construct an interval that is guaranteed to contain the task output from the true image up to a user-specified probability, and we use the width of that interval to quantify the uncertainty contributed by measurement-and-recovery. For posterior-sampling-based image recovery, we construct locally adaptive prediction intervals. Furthermore, we propose to collect measurements over multiple rounds, stopping as soon as the task uncertainty falls below an acceptable level. We demonstrate our methodology on accelerated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
5/30/2024
Robust Conformal Prediction Using Privileged Information
Shai Feldman, Yaniv Romano
0
0
We develop a method to generate prediction sets with a guaranteed coverage rate that is robust to corruptions in the training data, such as missing or noisy variables. Our approach builds on conformal prediction, a powerful framework to construct prediction sets that are valid under the i.i.d assumption. Importantly, naively applying conformal prediction does not provide reliable predictions in this setting, due to the distribution shift induced by the corruptions. To account for the distribution shift, we assume access to privileged information (PI). The PI is formulated as additional features that explain the distribution shift, however, they are only available during training and absent at test time. We approach this problem by introducing a novel generalization of weighted conformal prediction and support our method with theoretical coverage guarantees. Empirical experiments on both real and synthetic datasets indicate that our approach achieves a valid coverage rate and constructs more informative predictions compared to existing methods, which are not supported by theoretical guarantees.
6/11/2024
🖼️
Conformal Semantic Image Segmentation: Post-hoc Quantification of Predictive Uncertainty
Luca Mossina, Joseba Dalmau, L'eo and'eol
0
0
We propose a post-hoc, computationally lightweight method to quantify predictive uncertainty in semantic image segmentation. Our approach uses conformal prediction to generate statistically valid prediction sets that are guaranteed to include the ground-truth segmentation mask at a predefined confidence level. We introduce a novel visualization technique of conformalized predictions based on heatmaps, and provide metrics to assess their empirical validity. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach on well-known benchmark datasets and image segmentation prediction models, and conclude with practical insights.
5/9/2024
The Penalized Inverse Probability Measure for Conformal Classification
Paul Melki (IMS), Lionel Bombrun (IMS), Boubacar Diallo (IMS), J'er^ome Dias (IMS), Jean-Pierre da Costa (IMS)
0
0
The deployment of safe and trustworthy machine learning systems, and particularly complex black box neural networks, in real-world applications requires reliable and certified guarantees on their performance. The conformal prediction framework offers such formal guarantees by transforming any point into a set predictor with valid, finite-set, guarantees on the coverage of the true at a chosen level of confidence. Central to this methodology is the notion of the nonconformity score function that assigns to each example a measure of ''strangeness'' in comparison with the previously seen observations. While the coverage guarantees are maintained regardless of the nonconformity measure, the point predictor and the dataset, previous research has shown that the performance of a conformal model, as measured by its efficiency (the average size of the predicted sets) and its informativeness (the proportion of prediction sets that are singletons), is influenced by the choice of the nonconformity score function. The current work introduces the Penalized Inverse Probability (PIP) nonconformity score, and its regularized version RePIP, that allow the joint optimization of both efficiency and informativeness. Through toy examples and empirical results on the task of crop and weed image classification in agricultural robotics, the current work shows how PIP-based conformal classifiers exhibit precisely the desired behavior in comparison with other nonconformity measures and strike a good balance between informativeness and efficiency.
6/14/2024