Conformal Validity Guarantees Exist for Any Data Distribution
2405.06627
0
0
Abstract
As artificial intelligence (AI) / machine learning (ML) gain widespread adoption, practitioners are increasingly seeking means to quantify and control the risk these systems incur. This challenge is especially salient when such systems have autonomy to collect their own data, such as in black-box optimization and active learning, where their actions induce sequential feedback-loop shifts in the data distribution. Conformal prediction is a promising approach to uncertainty and risk quantification, but prior variants' validity guarantees have assumed some form of ``quasi-exchangeability'' on the data distribution, thereby excluding many types of sequential shifts. In this paper we prove that conformal prediction can theoretically be extended to textit{any} joint data distribution, not just exchangeable or quasi-exchangeable ones. Although the most general case is exceedingly impractical to compute, for concrete practical applications we outline a procedure for deriving specific conformal algorithms for any data distribution, and we use this procedure to derive tractable algorithms for a series of AI/ML-agent-induced covariate shifts. We evaluate the proposed algorithms empirically on synthetic black-box optimization and active learning tasks.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a theoretical result showing that conformal prediction methods can provide valid statistical guarantees on the accuracy of their predictions, regardless of the underlying data distribution.
- Conformal prediction is a machine learning technique that can produce prediction intervals or sets that are guaranteed to contain the true value with a pre-specified confidence level, even when the data does not follow any particular distribution.
- The authors prove that conformal prediction methods can maintain this validity property under very general conditions, including when the data exhibits covariate shift or other non-i.i.d. patterns.
Plain English Explanation
Conformal prediction is a powerful machine learning technique that can make predictions with guaranteed accuracy, regardless of the type of data being used. This paper shows that these validity guarantees will hold true even if the data does not follow a standard statistical distribution or if the underlying patterns in the data change over time.
The key idea behind conformal prediction is to construct prediction intervals or sets that have a pre-specified probability of containing the true value. For example, a 90% conformal prediction interval is guaranteed to capture the true value 90% of the time, no matter what the data looks like.
What makes this paper important is that it proves these validity guarantees can be maintained even in challenging real-world scenarios. For instance, covariate shift refers to a situation where the relationship between the input features and the target variable changes over time. The authors show that conformal prediction can still provide reliable predictions even when the data exhibits this type of non-stationarity.
This is a significant result because many real-world datasets do not follow textbook statistical distributions or have stable underlying patterns. By showing that conformal prediction can handle these complications, the paper demonstrates the broad applicability and robustness of this approach. It paves the way for using conformal prediction methods in a wide range of AI applications, from online model aggregation to black-box optimization.
Technical Explanation
The key technical contribution of this paper is a theoretical result showing that conformal prediction methods can maintain valid statistical guarantees under very general conditions. Specifically, the authors prove that conformal predictors can control the Type I error rate (the probability of making an incorrect prediction) at a pre-specified level, regardless of the underlying data distribution.
This result holds even in the presence of covariate shift, where the relationship between the input features and the target variable changes over time. The authors establish this by showing that the conformal prediction framework only requires the data to satisfy a condition called "exchangeability," which is a much weaker requirement than the typical i.i.d. (independent and identically distributed) assumption.
The paper also discusses how this theoretical validity guarantee can be leveraged in practical applications, such as active learning and black-box optimization. By providing reliable uncertainty estimates, conformal prediction can help guide the exploration of the input space and identify promising regions for further investigation.
Critical Analysis
The main strength of this paper is the generality of the theoretical results it presents. By relaxing the typical i.i.d. assumption and proving validity guarantees under much weaker conditions, the authors have significantly expanded the applicability of conformal prediction methods.
That said, the paper does not address some practical considerations that may arise when applying conformal prediction in real-world settings. For example, the authors do not discuss how to efficiently compute conformal prediction sets for high-dimensional or complex data, or how to handle missing values or outliers in the data.
Additionally, while the paper establishes the theoretical validity of conformal prediction, it does not provide a comprehensive comparison to other uncertainty quantification methods, such as Bayesian approaches or ensemble techniques. A more in-depth empirical evaluation across a diverse set of tasks and datasets would help contextualize the practical benefits and limitations of the conformal prediction framework.
Overall, this paper makes an important contribution by significantly broadening the theoretical foundations of conformal prediction. However, further research is needed to address the practical challenges of applying this approach in real-world machine learning problems.
Conclusion
This paper presents a groundbreaking theoretical result, showing that conformal prediction methods can provide valid statistical guarantees on the accuracy of their predictions, even when the underlying data distribution is unknown or changes over time. By relaxing the typical i.i.d. assumption, the authors have significantly expanded the applicability of conformal prediction, paving the way for its use in a wide range of AI applications.
The key insight is that conformal prediction only requires the data to satisfy a weaker condition called "exchangeability," which is a much less restrictive requirement than the standard i.i.d. assumption. This means conformal prediction can maintain its validity guarantees in the face of covariate shift and other non-i.i.d. patterns in the data.
Overall, this paper represents an important theoretical advance that strengthens the foundations of conformal prediction and opens the door to its wider adoption in real-world machine learning problems. By providing reliable uncertainty quantification, conformal prediction can help guide the exploration of complex input spaces and inform critical decision-making processes, with far-reaching implications for the field of AI and beyond.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🔮
Self-Consistent Conformal Prediction
Lars van der Laan, Ahmed M. Alaa
0
0
In decision-making guided by machine learning, decision-makers may take identical actions in contexts with identical predicted outcomes. Conformal prediction helps decision-makers quantify uncertainty in point predictions of outcomes, allowing for better risk management for actions. Motivated by this perspective, we introduce textit{Self-Consistent Conformal Prediction} for regression, which combines two post-hoc approaches -- Venn-Abers calibration and conformal prediction -- to provide calibrated point predictions and compatible prediction intervals that are valid conditional on model predictions. Our procedure can be applied post-hoc to any black-box model to provide predictions and inferences with finite-sample prediction-conditional guarantees. Numerical experiments show our approach strikes a balance between interval efficiency and conditional validity.
4/23/2024
Large language model validity via enhanced conformal prediction methods
John J. Cherian, Isaac Gibbs, Emmanuel J. Cand`es
0
0
We develop new conformal inference methods for obtaining validity guarantees on the output of large language models (LLMs). Prior work in conformal language modeling identifies a subset of the text that satisfies a high-probability guarantee of correctness. These methods work by filtering claims from the LLM's original response if a scoring function evaluated on the claim fails to exceed a threshold calibrated via split conformal prediction. Existing methods in this area suffer from two deficiencies. First, the guarantee stated is not conditionally valid. The trustworthiness of the filtering step may vary based on the topic of the response. Second, because the scoring function is imperfect, the filtering step can remove many valuable and accurate claims. We address both of these challenges via two new conformal methods. First, we generalize the conditional conformal procedure of Gibbs et al. (2023) in order to adaptively issue weaker guarantees when they are required to preserve the utility of the output. Second, we show how to systematically improve the quality of the scoring function via a novel algorithm for differentiating through the conditional conformal procedure. We demonstrate the efficacy of our approach on both synthetic and real-world datasets.
6/17/2024
Conformal online model aggregation
Matteo Gasparin, Aaditya Ramdas
0
0
Conformal prediction equips machine learning models with a reasonable notion of uncertainty quantification without making strong distributional assumptions. It wraps around any black-box prediction model and converts point predictions into set predictions that have a predefined marginal coverage guarantee. However, conformal prediction only works if we fix the underlying machine learning model in advance. A relatively unaddressed issue in conformal prediction is that of model selection and/or aggregation: for a given problem, which of the plethora of prediction methods (random forests, neural nets, regularized linear models, etc.) should we conformalize? This paper proposes a new approach towards conformal model aggregation in online settings that is based on combining the prediction sets from several algorithms by voting, where weights on the models are adapted over time based on past performance.
5/3/2024
🔮
A comparative study of conformal prediction methods for valid uncertainty quantification in machine learning
Nicolas Dewolf
0
0
In the past decades, most work in the area of data analysis and machine learning was focused on optimizing predictive models and getting better results than what was possible with existing models. To what extent the metrics with which such improvements were measured were accurately capturing the intended goal, whether the numerical differences in the resulting values were significant, or whether uncertainty played a role in this study and if it should have been taken into account, was of secondary importance. Whereas probability theory, be it frequentist or Bayesian, used to be the gold standard in science before the advent of the supercomputer, it was quickly replaced in favor of black box models and sheer computing power because of their ability to handle large data sets. This evolution sadly happened at the expense of interpretability and trustworthiness. However, while people are still trying to improve the predictive power of their models, the community is starting to realize that for many applications it is not so much the exact prediction that is of importance, but rather the variability or uncertainty. The work in this dissertation tries to further the quest for a world where everyone is aware of uncertainty, of how important it is and how to embrace it instead of fearing it. A specific, though general, framework that allows anyone to obtain accurate uncertainty estimates is singled out and analysed. Certain aspects and applications of the framework -- dubbed `conformal prediction' -- are studied in detail. Whereas many approaches to uncertainty quantification make strong assumptions about the data, conformal prediction is, at the time of writing, the only framework that deserves the title `distribution-free'. No parametric assumptions have to be made and the nonparametric results also hold without having to resort to the law of large numbers in the asymptotic regime.
5/6/2024