Conformance Checking of Fuzzy Logs against Declarative Temporal Specifications

Read original: arXiv:2406.12078 - Published 6/19/2024 by Ivan Donadello, Paolo Felli, Craig Innes, Fabrizio Maria Maggi, Marco Montali
Total Score

0

Conformance Checking of Fuzzy Logs against Declarative Temporal Specifications

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents a method for checking the conformance of fuzzy event logs against declarative temporal specifications.
  • Fuzzy event logs capture uncertainty in the occurrence and timing of events, which is common in real-world applications.
  • The proposed approach uses fuzzy linear temporal logic (FLTL) to represent the temporal specifications, and a novel conformance checking algorithm to evaluate the degree to which a fuzzy log satisfies the FLTL specification.

Plain English Explanation

In many real-world applications, the data we collect about events is not always perfectly precise. There may be uncertainty around when exactly an event occurred or even whether it occurred at all. This type of "fuzzy" data can make it challenging to analyze and verify whether the system is behaving as expected.

This research tackles this problem by developing a way to check how well a fuzzy event log conforms to a set of temporal rules or specifications. The key idea is to use a type of fuzzy logic, called fuzzy linear temporal logic (FLTL), to express these temporal rules in a more flexible way that can account for the inherent uncertainty in the data.

The conformance checking process then evaluates how closely the fuzzy event log matches the FLTL specifications, providing a quantitative measure of the degree of conformance. This allows system designers to assess whether the real-world behavior of their system is aligned with the intended temporal requirements, even in the face of noisy or imprecise data.

By bridging the gap between the inherent fuzziness of real-world data and the formal temporal logic used to specify system behavior, this research enables more robust and reliable conformance checking for a wide range of applications, from business processes to cyber-physical systems.

Technical Explanation

The key technical contributions of this paper are:

  1. Fuzzy Linear Temporal Logic (FLTL): The authors extend classic linear temporal logic (LTL) to handle fuzzy events, allowing the specification of temporal rules that can account for uncertainty in event timing and occurrence. FLTL provides a flexible way to express temporal constraints over fuzzy event logs.

  2. Conformance Checking Algorithm: The authors develop a novel algorithm to evaluate the degree to which a given fuzzy event log conforms to an FLTL specification. This algorithm computes a conformance score that quantifies how well the log satisfies the temporal rules.

  3. Experimental Evaluation: The paper presents an experimental evaluation of the proposed approach using both synthetic and real-world fuzzy event logs. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the FLTL-based conformance checking method, showing that it can accurately identify deviations from the specified temporal requirements.

The conformance checking process works as follows:

  1. The system designer specifies the expected temporal behavior of the system using FLTL formulas.
  2. The fuzzy event log, captured from the real-world system, is provided as input.
  3. The conformance checking algorithm evaluates how well the fuzzy log satisfies the FLTL specifications, producing a quantitative conformance score.
  4. The conformance score can then be used to assess the overall alignment between the system's actual behavior and the desired temporal requirements.

By integrating fuzzy logic and temporal logic, this research advances the state of the art in conformance checking, enabling more robust and reliable analysis of systems with inherent uncertainty in their event data.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes a valuable contribution by addressing the challenge of conformance checking for fuzzy event logs, which is a common issue in many real-world applications. The use of FLTL to represent temporal specifications is a clever extension of traditional LTL, allowing for more flexible and expressive modeling of uncertain event data.

However, the paper does not discuss the computational complexity of the proposed conformance checking algorithm, which could be an important consideration for large-scale or time-sensitive applications. Additionally, the authors acknowledge that the current approach assumes that the fuzzy event logs are provided upfront, whereas in practice, the logs may be continuously generated and need to be analyzed in a streaming fashion.

Further research could explore ways to optimize the conformance checking process, such as by developing incremental or distributed algorithms, or investigating techniques to automatically learn FLTL specifications from data, as seen in related work like Learning Temporal Logic Predicates from Data and Retrieval-Augmented Mining of Temporal Logic Specifications from Data.

Additionally, it would be valuable to study the application of this approach to more complex temporal logics, such as Temporal Planning via Interval Logic Satisfiability or Non-Deterministic Planning and Hyperproperty Verification, which could further expand the expressiveness and applicability of the conformance checking framework.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel method for checking the conformance of fuzzy event logs against declarative temporal specifications. By extending linear temporal logic to a fuzzy variant (FLTL) and developing a conformance checking algorithm, the authors have addressed an important challenge in analyzing real-world systems with inherent uncertainty in their event data.

The proposed approach enables system designers to quantify the degree to which a system's actual behavior, as captured in a fuzzy event log, aligns with the intended temporal requirements. This advance in conformance checking can have significant implications for a wide range of applications, from business process monitoring to the verification of cyber-physical systems, where robust and reliable analysis of noisy event data is crucial.

While the paper highlights some avenues for future research, such as improving the computational efficiency and exploring more expressive temporal logics, the core contributions represent an important step forward in bridging the gap between formal specifications and the realities of real-world, imperfect data.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Conformance Checking of Fuzzy Logs against Declarative Temporal Specifications
Total Score

0

Conformance Checking of Fuzzy Logs against Declarative Temporal Specifications

Ivan Donadello, Paolo Felli, Craig Innes, Fabrizio Maria Maggi, Marco Montali

Traditional conformance checking tasks assume that event data provide a faithful and complete representation of the actual process executions. This assumption has been recently questioned: more and more often events are not traced explicitly, but are instead indirectly obtained as the result of event recognition pipelines, and thus inherently come with uncertainty. In this work, differently from the typical probabilistic interpretation of uncertainty, we consider the relevant case where uncertainty refers to which activity is actually conducted, under a fuzzy semantics. In this novel setting, we consider the problem of checking whether fuzzy event data conform with declarative temporal rules specified as Declare patterns or, more generally, as formulae of linear temporal logic over finite traces (LTLf). This requires to relax the assumption that at each instant only one activity is executed, and to correspondingly redefine boolean operators of the logic with a fuzzy semantics. Specifically, we provide a threefold contribution. First, we define a fuzzy counterpart of LTLf tailored to our purpose. Second, we cast conformance checking over fuzzy logs as a verification problem in this logic. Third, we provide a proof-of-concept, efficient implementation based on the PyTorch Python library, suited to check conformance of multiple fuzzy traces at once.

Read more

6/19/2024

🛠️

Total Score

0

New!Temporal Many-valued Conditional Logics: a Preliminary Report

Mario Alviano, Laura Giordano, Daniele Theseider Dupr'e

In this paper we propose a many-valued temporal conditional logic. We start from a many-valued logic with typicality, and extend it with the temporal operators of the Linear Time Temporal Logic (LTL), thus providing a formalism which is able to capture the dynamics of a system, trough strict and defeasible temporal properties. We also consider an instantiation of the formalism for gradual argumentation.

Read more

9/17/2024

Learning Temporal Logic Predicates from Data with Statistical Guarantees
Total Score

0

Learning Temporal Logic Predicates from Data with Statistical Guarantees

Emi Soroka, Rohan Sinha, Sanjay Lall

Temporal logic rules are often used in control and robotics to provide structured, human-interpretable descriptions of high-dimensional trajectory data. These rules have numerous applications including safety validation using formal methods, constraining motion planning among autonomous agents, and classifying data. However, existing methods for learning temporal logic predicates from data provide no assurances about the correctness of the resulting predicate. We present a novel method to learn temporal logic predicates from data with finite-sample correctness guarantees. Our approach leverages expression optimization and conformal prediction to learn predicates that correctly describe future trajectories under mild assumptions with a user-defined confidence level. We provide experimental results showing the performance of our approach on a simulated trajectory dataset and perform ablation studies to understand how each component of our algorithm contributes to its performance.

Read more

6/18/2024

🎲

Total Score

0

LTLDoG: Satisfying Temporally-Extended Symbolic Constraints for Safe Diffusion-based Planning

Zeyu Feng, Hao Luan, Pranav Goyal, Harold Soh

Operating effectively in complex environments while complying with specified constraints is crucial for the safe and successful deployment of robots that interact with and operate around people. In this work, we focus on generating long-horizon trajectories that adhere to novel static and temporally-extended constraints/instructions at test time. We propose a data-driven diffusion-based framework, LTLDoG, that modifies the inference steps of the reverse process given an instruction specified using finite linear temporal logic ($text{LTL}_f$). LTLDoG leverages a satisfaction value function on $text{LTL}_f$ and guides the sampling steps using its gradient field. This value function can also be trained to generalize to new instructions not observed during training, enabling flexible test-time adaptability. Experiments in robot navigation and manipulation illustrate that the method is able to generate trajectories that satisfy formulae that specify obstacle avoidance and visitation sequences.

Read more

5/8/2024