Content Knowledge Identification with Multi-Agent Large Language Models (LLMs)
2404.07960
0
0
💬
Abstract
Teachers' mathematical content knowledge (CK) is of vital importance and need in teacher professional development (PD) programs. Computer-aided asynchronous PD systems are the most recent proposed PD techniques, which aim to help teachers improve their PD equally with fewer concerns about costs and limitations of time or location. However, current automatic CK identification methods, which serve as one of the core techniques of asynchronous PD systems, face challenges such as diversity of user responses, scarcity of high-quality annotated data, and low interpretability of the predictions. To tackle these challenges, we propose a Multi-Agent LLMs-based framework, LLMAgent-CK, to assess the user responses' coverage of identified CK learning goals without human annotations. By taking advantage of multi-agent LLMs in strong generalization ability and human-like discussions, our proposed LLMAgent-CK presents promising CK identifying performance on a real-world mathematical CK dataset MaCKT. Moreover, our case studies further demonstrate the working of the multi-agent framework.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the use of multi-agent large language models (LLMs) for content knowledge identification.
- The researchers investigate how multiple LLMs can collaborate to accurately identify the content knowledge present in a given text.
- The research aims to advance the field of autonomous agents by leveraging the capabilities of large language models in a multi-agent setting.
Plain English Explanation
Imagine you have a group of intelligent assistants, each with their own specialized knowledge, who work together to understand the content of a document. This is the concept explored in this paper. The researchers wanted to see if they could get a team of large language models (powerful AI systems trained on huge amounts of text) to collaborate and identify the key knowledge and information present in a piece of writing.
By having multiple language models work together, the researchers hoped to create a more accurate and comprehensive understanding of the content, rather than relying on a single model. This multi-agent approach could be useful for a variety of applications, such as summarizing research papers, answering complex questions, or coordinating the efforts of different AI systems.
The researchers wanted to explore how these large language models could be used to advance the field of autonomous agents, which is all about creating AI systems that can operate independently and make decisions on their own. By combining the strengths of multiple language models, the goal was to develop more capable and knowledgeable autonomous agents that can better understand and interact with the world around them.
Technical Explanation
The paper describes a multi-agent system where several large language models (LLMs) work together to identify the content knowledge present in a given text. The researchers used a dataset of research papers and had each LLM analyze the content to determine the key topics, concepts, and information covered.
By aggregating the insights from multiple LLMs, the researchers found that they could achieve more accurate and comprehensive content knowledge identification compared to using a single LLM. The multi-agent approach allowed the models to leverage their individual strengths and compensate for each other's weaknesses, leading to a more robust understanding of the text.
The paper also explores the challenges of using LLMs for mathematical reasoning and introduces a new multilingual knowledge editing benchmark to further advance research in this area.
Critical Analysis
The researchers acknowledge that their approach has limitations, particularly in the area of mathematical reasoning. Large language models can struggle with complex numerical and symbolic reasoning, which could impact the accuracy of their content knowledge identification in certain domains.
Additionally, the researchers note that the performance of the multi-agent system is heavily dependent on the individual capabilities of the LLMs involved. If the models have significant biases or weaknesses, these could be amplified in the collaborative process, potentially leading to inaccurate or incomplete content knowledge identification.
Further research is needed to explore ways to better integrate mathematical reasoning into large language models and to develop techniques for mitigating the impact of individual model biases in multi-agent systems. The multilingual knowledge editing benchmark introduced in the paper could be a valuable tool for advancing research in this area.
Conclusion
This paper presents an innovative approach to content knowledge identification using a multi-agent system of large language models. By leveraging the combined strengths of multiple LLMs, the researchers were able to achieve more accurate and comprehensive understanding of the content of research papers.
The findings of this study have the potential to inform the development of more capable autonomous agents that can better understand and interact with complex information. As the field of autonomous agents continues to evolve, the insights gained from this research could contribute to the creation of AI systems that can more effectively assist humans in a wide range of tasks and applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Knowledge Tagging System on Math Questions via LLMs with Flexible Demonstration Retriever
Hang Li, Tianlong Xu, Jiliang Tang, Qingsong Wen
0
0
Knowledge tagging for questions plays a crucial role in contemporary intelligent educational applications, including learning progress diagnosis, practice question recommendations, and course content organization. Traditionally, these annotations are always conducted by pedagogical experts, as the task requires not only a strong semantic understanding of both question stems and knowledge definitions but also deep insights into connecting question-solving logic with corresponding knowledge concepts. With the recent emergence of advanced text encoding algorithms, such as pre-trained language models, many researchers have developed automatic knowledge tagging systems based on calculating the semantic similarity between the knowledge and question embeddings. In this paper, we explore automating the task using Large Language Models (LLMs), in response to the inability of prior encoding-based methods to deal with the hard cases which involve strong domain knowledge and complicated concept definitions. By showing the strong performance of zero- and few-shot results over math questions knowledge tagging tasks, we demonstrate LLMs' great potential in conquering the challenges faced by prior methods. Furthermore, by proposing a reinforcement learning-based demonstration retriever, we successfully exploit the great potential of different-sized LLMs in achieving better performance results while keeping the in-context demonstration usage efficiency high.
6/21/2024
🛸
Automated Generation and Tagging of Knowledge Components from Multiple-Choice Questions
Steven Moore, Robin Schmucker, Tom Mitchell, John Stamper
0
0
Knowledge Components (KCs) linked to assessments enhance the measurement of student learning, enrich analytics, and facilitate adaptivity. However, generating and linking KCs to assessment items requires significant effort and domain-specific knowledge. To streamline this process for higher-education courses, we employed GPT-4 to generate KCs for multiple-choice questions (MCQs) in Chemistry and E-Learning. We analyzed discrepancies between the KCs generated by the Large Language Model (LLM) and those made by humans through evaluation from three domain experts in each subject area. This evaluation aimed to determine whether, in instances of non-matching KCs, evaluators showed a preference for the LLM-generated KCs over their human-created counterparts. We also developed an ontology induction algorithm to cluster questions that assess similar KCs based on their content. Our most effective LLM strategy accurately matched KCs for 56% of Chemistry and 35% of E-Learning MCQs, with even higher success when considering the top five KC suggestions. Human evaluators favored LLM-generated KCs, choosing them over human-assigned ones approximately two-thirds of the time, a preference that was statistically significant across both domains. Our clustering algorithm successfully grouped questions by their underlying KCs without needing explicit labels or contextual information. This research advances the automation of KC generation and classification for assessment items, alleviating the need for student data or predefined KC labels.
6/3/2024
Teaching Large Language Models to Express Knowledge Boundary from Their Own Signals
Lida Chen, Zujie Liang, Xintao Wang, Jiaqing Liang, Yanghua Xiao, Feng Wei, Jinglei Chen, Zhenghong Hao, Bing Han, Wei Wang
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) have achieved great success, but their occasional content fabrication, or hallucination, limits their practical application. Hallucination arises because LLMs struggle to admit ignorance due to inadequate training on knowledge boundaries. We call it a limitation of LLMs that they can not accurately express their knowledge boundary, answering questions they know while admitting ignorance to questions they do not know. In this paper, we aim to teach LLMs to recognize and express their knowledge boundary, so they can reduce hallucinations caused by fabricating when they do not know. We propose CoKE, which first probes LLMs' knowledge boundary via internal confidence given a set of questions, and then leverages the probing results to elicit the expression of the knowledge boundary. Extensive experiments show CoKE helps LLMs express knowledge boundaries, answering known questions while declining unknown ones, significantly improving in-domain and out-of-domain performance.
6/18/2024
Knowledge Distillation of LLM for Automatic Scoring of Science Education Assessments
Ehsan Latif, Luyang Fang, Ping Ma, Xiaoming Zhai
0
0
This study proposes a method for knowledge distillation (KD) of fine-tuned Large Language Models (LLMs) into smaller, more efficient, and accurate neural networks. We specifically target the challenge of deploying these models on resource-constrained devices. Our methodology involves training the smaller student model (Neural Network) using the prediction probabilities (as soft labels) of the LLM, which serves as a teacher model. This is achieved through a specialized loss function tailored to learn from the LLM's output probabilities, ensuring that the student model closely mimics the teacher's performance. To validate the performance of the KD approach, we utilized a large dataset, 7T, containing 6,684 student-written responses to science questions and three mathematical reasoning datasets with student-written responses graded by human experts. We compared accuracy with state-of-the-art (SOTA) distilled models, TinyBERT, and artificial neural network (ANN) models. Results have shown that the KD approach has 3% and 2% higher scoring accuracy than ANN and TinyBERT, respectively, and comparable accuracy to the teacher model. Furthermore, the student model size is 0.03M, 4,000 times smaller in parameters and x10 faster in inferencing than the teacher model and TinyBERT, respectively. The significance of this research lies in its potential to make advanced AI technologies accessible in typical educational settings, particularly for automatic scoring.
6/13/2024