In-Context Learning Improves Compositional Understanding of Vision-Language Models
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper investigates compositional understanding in vision-language models (VLMs).
- It explores how well VLMs can handle compositional tasks that require combining information from different parts of an image and text.
- The researchers conduct several experiments to assess the compositional capabilities of various state-of-the-art VLMs.
Plain English Explanation
Vision-language models (VLMs) are AI systems that can understand and reason about the relationship between visual and textual information. For example, a VLM might be able to look at an image of a person wearing a red shirt and correctly identify that the shirt is red.
However, more complex compositional tasks, which involve combining different pieces of information, can be challenging for VLMs. This paper investigates how well VLMs can handle these types of compositional tasks.
The researchers conduct several experiments to assess the compositional capabilities of various state-of-the-art VLMs. For instance, they might show a VLM an image of a person wearing a red shirt and a blue hat, and then ask the VLM to identify the color of the shirt and the hat. This tests the VLM's ability to separately recognize the colors of different parts of the image and combine that information.
By testing VLMs on these types of compositional tasks, the researchers aim to better understand the strengths and limitations of current VLM technology. This knowledge can then be used to improve the design and training of future VLMs, making them more capable of understanding the complex relationships between visual and textual information.
Technical Explanation
The paper examines compositional understanding in vision-language models (VLMs). The authors conduct a series of experiments to evaluate how well various state-of-the-art VLMs can handle compositional tasks that require integrating different pieces of information from the image and text.
One key experiment involves presenting VLMs with an image of a person wearing a red shirt and a blue hat, and then asking the model to identify the color of the shirt and the hat separately. This tests the VLM's ability to recognize and combine the individual attributes of the image, rather than just treating it as a single holistic entity.
The researchers also explore other types of compositional tasks, such as answering questions that require reasoning about the spatial relationships between objects in an image. By assessing VLMs across a range of these compositional benchmarks, the paper aims to provide a more comprehensive understanding of their compositional capabilities and limitations.
The findings suggest that while current VLMs show promising performance on some compositional tasks, they still struggle with more complex forms of compositional understanding. The paper discusses potential reasons for these limitations, such as the training data and architectures used by VLMs, and highlights areas for future research and development.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough and insightful investigation of compositional understanding in VLMs, a crucial capability for these models to achieve more human-like reasoning and language understanding.
One limitation mentioned in the paper is the inherent biases and simplifications present in the evaluation datasets used. The authors acknowledge that these benchmarks may not fully capture the breadth and nuance of real-world compositional challenges. Expanding the diversity and complexity of the evaluation tasks could further stress-test the models and reveal additional areas for improvement.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the specific architectural choices and training regimes that may contribute to the observed compositional strengths and weaknesses of the VLMs. Exploring these model-level factors in more detail could provide valuable insights for guiding the development of more compositionally capable VLMs.
Overall, this paper makes an important contribution to the understanding of compositional reasoning in VLMs and highlights the need for continued research and innovation in this area to advance the state-of-the-art in multimodal AI.
Conclusion
This paper presents a detailed investigation of compositional understanding in vision-language models (VLMs). Through a series of experiments, the researchers assess the ability of various state-of-the-art VLMs to handle compositional tasks that require integrating different pieces of information from the image and text.
The findings suggest that while current VLMs show promise in some compositional areas, they still struggle with more complex forms of compositional reasoning. The paper discusses potential reasons for these limitations and highlights opportunities for future research to improve the compositional capabilities of VLMs.
As VLMs continue to advance, the ability to understand and reason about the compositional relationships between visual and textual information will be crucial for developing more human-like AI systems. This paper provides valuable insights and a solid foundation for ongoing work in this important area of multimodal AI research.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
In-Context Learning Improves Compositional Understanding of Vision-Language Models
Matteo Nulli, Anesa Ibrahimi, Avik Pal, Hoshe Lee, Ivona Najdenkoska
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities in a large number of downstream tasks. Nonetheless, compositional image understanding remains a rather difficult task due to the object bias present in training data. In this work, we investigate the reasons for such a lack of capability by performing an extensive bench-marking of compositional understanding in VLMs. We compare contrastive models with generative ones and analyze their differences in architecture, pre-training data, and training tasks and losses. Furthermore, we leverage In-Context Learning (ICL) as a way to improve the ability of VLMs to perform more complex reasoning and understanding given an image. Our extensive experiments demonstrate that our proposed approach outperforms baseline models across multiple compositional understanding datasets.
Read more7/23/2024
👀
0
Towards Multimodal In-Context Learning for Vision & Language Models
Sivan Doveh, Shaked Perek, M. Jehanzeb Mirza, Wei Lin, Amit Alfassy, Assaf Arbelle, Shimon Ullman, Leonid Karlinsky
State-of-the-art Vision-Language Models (VLMs) ground the vision and the language modality primarily via projecting the vision tokens from the encoder to language-like tokens, which are directly fed to the Large Language Model (LLM) decoder. While these models have shown unprecedented performance in many downstream zero-shot tasks (eg image captioning, question answers, etc), still little emphasis has been put on transferring one of the core LLM capability of In-Context Learning (ICL). ICL is the ability of a model to reason about a downstream task with a few examples demonstrations embedded in the prompt. In this work, through extensive evaluations, we find that the state-of-the-art VLMs somewhat lack the ability to follow ICL instructions. In particular, we discover that even models that underwent large-scale mixed modality pre-training and were implicitly guided to make use of interleaved image and text information (intended to consume helpful context from multiple images) under-perform when prompted with few-shot demonstrations (in an ICL way), likely due to their lack of direct ICL instruction tuning. To enhance the ICL abilities of the present VLM, we propose a simple yet surprisingly effective multi-turn curriculum-based learning methodology with effective data mixes, leading up to a significant 21.03% (and 11.3% on average) ICL performance boost over the strongest VLM baselines and a variety of ICL benchmarks. Furthermore, we also contribute new benchmarks for ICL evaluation in VLMs and discuss their advantages over the prior art.
Read more7/18/2024
0
Contrasting Intra-Modal and Ranking Cross-Modal Hard Negatives to Enhance Visio-Linguistic Compositional Understanding
Le Zhang, Rabiul Awal, Aishwarya Agrawal
Vision-Language Models (VLMs), such as CLIP, exhibit strong image-text comprehension abilities, facilitating advances in several downstream tasks such as zero-shot image classification, image-text retrieval, and text-to-image generation. However, the compositional reasoning abilities of existing VLMs remains subpar. The root of this limitation lies in the inadequate alignment between the images and captions in the pretraining datasets. Additionally, the current contrastive learning objective fails to focus on fine-grained grounding components like relations, actions, and attributes, resulting in bag-of-words representations. We introduce a simple and effective method to improve compositional reasoning in VLMs. Our method better leverages available datasets by refining and expanding the standard image-text contrastive learning framework. Our approach does not require specific annotations and does not incur extra parameters. When integrated with CLIP, our technique yields notable improvement over state-of-the-art baselines across five vision-language compositional benchmarks. We open-source our code at https://github.com/lezhang7/Enhance-FineGrained.
Read more4/26/2024
0
Exploring the Spectrum of Visio-Linguistic Compositionality and Recognition
Youngtaek Oh, Pyunghwan Ahn, Jinhyung Kim, Gwangmo Song, Soonyoung Lee, In So Kweon, Junmo Kim
Vision and language models (VLMs) such as CLIP have showcased remarkable zero-shot recognition abilities yet face challenges in visio-linguistic compositionality, particularly in linguistic comprehension and fine-grained image-text alignment. This paper explores the intricate relationship between compositionality and recognition -- two pivotal aspects of VLM capability. We conduct a comprehensive evaluation of existing VLMs, covering both pre-training approaches aimed at recognition and the fine-tuning methods designed to improve compositionality. Our evaluation employs 12 benchmarks for compositionality, along with 21 zero-shot classification and two retrieval benchmarks for recognition. In our analysis from 274 CLIP model checkpoints, we reveal patterns and trade-offs that emerge between compositional understanding and recognition accuracy. Ultimately, this necessitates strategic efforts towards developing models that improve both capabilities, as well as the meticulous formulation of benchmarks for compositionality. We open our evaluation framework at https://github.com/ytaek-oh/vl_compo.
Read more6/14/2024