Contextual Dual Learning Algorithm with Listwise Distillation for Unbiased Learning to Rank

Read original: arXiv:2408.09817 - Published 8/20/2024 by Lulu Yu, Keping Bi, Shiyu Ni, Jiafeng Guo
Total Score

0

Contextual Dual Learning Algorithm with Listwise Distillation for Unbiased Learning to Rank

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper presents a novel approach called Contextual Dual Learning Algorithm with Listwise Distillation for Unbiased Learning to Rank.
  • The method aims to address position bias and contextual bias in the learning to rank task.
  • It employs a dual learning architecture and listwise distillation technique to train an unbiased ranking model.

Plain English Explanation

The paper introduces a new technique called Contextual Dual Learning Algorithm with Listwise Distillation for Unbiased Learning to Rank. The key challenge in learning to rank is that the data used to train the ranking model can be biased. For example, users are more likely to click on results at the top of a search results page, even if those results are not the most relevant. This is called position bias. There can also be contextual bias, where the ranking of results depends on the specific query or user.

The proposed method aims to address these biases and train a ranking model that provides more accurate and unbiased results. It does this by using a dual learning architecture, where two models are trained simultaneously - one that predicts the relevance of each item, and another that predicts the position bias. The two models learn from each other, with the goal of the relevance model becoming unbiased.

The paper also introduces a listwise distillation technique, which helps transfer knowledge from the dual learning models to a final ranking model. This final model is trained to produce unbiased rankings, leveraging the insights gained during the dual learning process.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents the Contextual Dual Learning Algorithm with Listwise Distillation for Unbiased Learning to Rank. The key technical elements are:

  1. Dual Learning Architecture: The method uses two models - a Relevance Model that predicts the relevance of each item, and a Position Bias Model that predicts the position bias. These models learn from each other, with the goal of the Relevance Model becoming unbiased.

  2. Listwise Distillation: The paper introduces a listwise distillation technique, which transfers knowledge from the dual learning models to a final Ranking Model. This Ranking Model is trained to produce unbiased rankings, leveraging the insights gained during the dual learning process.

  3. Contextual Bias Modeling: The method explicitly models contextual bias, where the ranking of results depends on the specific query or user. This is in addition to modeling position bias.

  4. Experiment Design: The paper evaluates the proposed method on several benchmark datasets for learning to rank, comparing it to state-of-the-art unbiased and debiased ranking techniques.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes a strong contribution by addressing the important problem of position bias and contextual bias in learning to rank. The dual learning architecture and listwise distillation technique are novel and well-designed approaches to mitigate these biases.

However, the paper does not discuss the computational complexity of the proposed method, which could be a practical concern for large-scale applications. Additionally, the paper could have provided more insights into the failure cases or limitations of the method, which would help guide future research in this area.

Another potential issue is the reliance on the availability of unbiased relevance labels, which can be difficult to obtain in real-world scenarios. The paper could have discussed strategies for dealing with noisy or partially biased labels.

Conclusion

The Contextual Dual Learning Algorithm with Listwise Distillation for Unbiased Learning to Rank presents a promising approach for training accurate and unbiased ranking models. By addressing position bias and contextual bias through a dual learning architecture and listwise distillation, the method represents an important advancement in the field of unbiased learning to rank. The insights from this research could help improve the fairness and reliability of ranking systems in a variety of applications, from web search to recommendation engines.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Contextual Dual Learning Algorithm with Listwise Distillation for Unbiased Learning to Rank
Total Score

0

Contextual Dual Learning Algorithm with Listwise Distillation for Unbiased Learning to Rank

Lulu Yu, Keping Bi, Shiyu Ni, Jiafeng Guo

Unbiased Learning to Rank (ULTR) aims to leverage biased implicit user feedback (e.g., click) to optimize an unbiased ranking model. The effectiveness of the existing ULTR methods has primarily been validated on synthetic datasets. However, their performance on real-world click data remains unclear. Recently, Baidu released a large publicly available dataset of their web search logs. Subsequently, the NTCIR-17 ULTRE-2 task released a subset dataset extracted from it. We conduct experiments on commonly used or effective ULTR methods on this subset to determine whether they maintain their effectiveness. In this paper, we propose a Contextual Dual Learning Algorithm with Listwise Distillation (CDLA-LD) to simultaneously address both position bias and contextual bias. We utilize a listwise-input ranking model to obtain reconstructed feature vectors incorporating local contextual information and employ the Dual Learning Algorithm (DLA) method to jointly train this ranking model and a propensity model to address position bias. As this ranking model learns the interaction information within the documents list of the training set, to enhance the ranking model's generalization ability, we additionally train a pointwise-input ranking model to learn the listwise-input ranking model's capability for relevance judgment in a listwise manner. Extensive experiments and analysis confirm the effectiveness of our approach.

Read more

8/20/2024

Unbiased Learning to Rank Meets Reality: Lessons from Baidu's Large-Scale Search Dataset
Total Score

0

Unbiased Learning to Rank Meets Reality: Lessons from Baidu's Large-Scale Search Dataset

Philipp Hager, Romain Deffayet, Jean-Michel Renders, Onno Zoeter, Maarten de Rijke

Unbiased learning-to-rank (ULTR) is a well-established framework for learning from user clicks, which are often biased by the ranker collecting the data. While theoretically justified and extensively tested in simulation, ULTR techniques lack empirical validation, especially on modern search engines. The Baidu-ULTR dataset released for the WSDM Cup 2023, collected from Baidu's search engine, offers a rare opportunity to assess the real-world performance of prominent ULTR techniques. Despite multiple submissions during the WSDM Cup 2023 and the subsequent NTCIR ULTRE-2 task, it remains unclear whether the observed improvements stem from applying ULTR or other learning techniques. In this work, we revisit and extend the available experiments on the Baidu-ULTR dataset. We find that standard unbiased learning-to-rank techniques robustly improve click predictions but struggle to consistently improve ranking performance, especially considering the stark differences obtained by choice of ranking loss and query-document features. Our experiments reveal that gains in click prediction do not necessarily translate to enhanced ranking performance on expert relevance annotations, implying that conclusions strongly depend on how success is measured in this benchmark.

Read more

5/16/2024

🚀

Total Score

0

Whole Page Unbiased Learning to Rank

Haitao Mao, Lixin Zou, Yujia Zheng, Jiliang Tang, Xiaokai Chu, Jiashu Zhao, Qian Wang, Dawei Yin

The page presentation biases in the information retrieval system, especially on the click behavior, is a well-known challenge that hinders improving ranking models' performance with implicit user feedback. Unbiased Learning to Rank~(ULTR) algorithms are then proposed to learn an unbiased ranking model with biased click data. However, most existing algorithms are specifically designed to mitigate position-related bias, e.g., trust bias, without considering biases induced by other features in search result page presentation(SERP), e.g. attractive bias induced by the multimedia. Unfortunately, those biases widely exist in industrial systems and may lead to an unsatisfactory search experience. Therefore, we introduce a new problem, i.e., whole-page Unbiased Learning to Rank(WP-ULTR), aiming to handle biases induced by whole-page SERP features simultaneously. It presents tremendous challenges: (1) a suitable user behavior model (user behavior hypothesis) can be hard to find; and (2) complex biases cannot be handled by existing algorithms. To address the above challenges, we propose a Bias Agnostic whole-page unbiased Learning to rank algorithm, named BAL, to automatically find the user behavior model with causal discovery and mitigate the biases induced by multiple SERP features with no specific design. Experimental results on a real-world dataset verify the effectiveness of the BAL.

Read more

6/14/2024

🐍

Total Score

0

Dual Correction Strategy for Ranking Distillation in Top-N Recommender System

Youngjune Lee, Kee-Eung Kim

Knowledge Distillation (KD), which transfers the knowledge of a well-trained large model (teacher) to a small model (student), has become an important area of research for practical deployment of recommender systems. Recently, Relaxed Ranking Distillation (RRD) has shown that distilling the ranking information in the recommendation list significantly improves the performance. However, the method still has limitations in that 1) it does not fully utilize the prediction errors of the student model, which makes the training not fully efficient, and 2) it only distills the user-side ranking information, which provides an insufficient view under the sparse implicit feedback. This paper presents Dual Correction strategy for Distillation (DCD), which transfers the ranking information from the teacher model to the student model in a more efficient manner. Most importantly, DCD uses the discrepancy between the teacher model and the student model predictions to decide which knowledge to be distilled. By doing so, DCD essentially provides the learning guidance tailored to correcting what the student model has failed to accurately predict. This process is applied for transferring the ranking information from the user-side as well as the item-side to address sparse implicit user feedback. Our experiments show that the proposed method outperforms the state-of-the-art baselines, and ablation studies validate the effectiveness of each component.

Read more

5/16/2024