Unbiased Learning to Rank Meets Reality: Lessons from Baidu's Large-Scale Search Dataset
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the challenges of unbiased learning to rank (LTR) algorithms when applied to real-world, large-scale search datasets, using Baidu's search data as a case study.
- The authors find that common assumptions made in unbiased LTR research do not always hold in practice, leading to suboptimal performance.
- They propose several recommendations to improve the effectiveness of unbiased LTR methods in realistic settings.
Plain English Explanation
Learning to rank (LTR) is a key technique used by search engines to determine the most relevant results for a user's query. Unbiased LTR methods aim to create ranking algorithms that are not influenced by potential biases in the training data, such as users clicking more on results at the top of the page.
However, this paper shows that when applying unbiased LTR techniques to a real-world, large-scale search dataset from Baidu, the assumptions commonly made in research do not always hold. For example, the authors find that user clicks are not always a reliable indicator of relevance, as users may click on results for reasons beyond just relevance.
As a result, the unbiased LTR models do not perform as well as expected in this realistic setting. The authors provide several recommendations to improve the effectiveness of unbiased LTR, such as developing better ways to measure relevance beyond just clicks, and incorporating additional signals beyond just click data.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by outlining the key challenges of unbiased LTR in realistic settings, including issues around using click data as relevance labels and the impact of position bias.
The authors then describe their experimental setup using a large-scale search dataset from Baidu. They evaluate several state-of-the-art unbiased LTR methods, including Inverse Propensity Scoring (IPS) and Randomized Interventions (RI), and compare their performance to standard LTR baselines.
The results show that the unbiased methods do not significantly outperform the standard baselines, in contrast to the typical findings in research settings. The authors dig into the reasons for this, finding that the assumptions made in unbiased LTR research, such as clicks accurately representing relevance, do not hold in this real-world dataset.
To address these issues, the authors propose several recommendations, including:
- Developing better ways to measure relevance beyond just clicks
- Incorporating additional signals beyond click data, such as user satisfaction metrics
- Carefully validating unbiased LTR methods on realistic, large-scale datasets before deployment
Critical Analysis
The authors do a commendable job of highlighting the challenges of applying unbiased LTR techniques to real-world, large-scale search data. Their findings demonstrate the importance of validating research assumptions in practical settings, as methods that perform well in controlled experiments may not translate effectively to production environments.
One potential limitation is the use of a single dataset from Baidu. While this provides valuable insight into the challenges faced by a major search engine, the findings may not generalize to all real-world search scenarios. It would be helpful to see the authors' recommendations validated on additional large-scale datasets from other search providers.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the root causes of the discrepancies between research and practice. Further investigation into the specific factors that lead to the breakdown of unbiased LTR assumptions, such as user behavior patterns or data quality issues, could provide more actionable guidance for improving these methods.
Conclusion
This paper serves as an important wake-up call for the unbiased LTR research community. It demonstrates that the common assumptions and techniques developed in controlled settings do not always translate to real-world, large-scale search environments.
The authors' recommendations provide a valuable roadmap for enhancing unbiased LTR methods to better address the challenges of practical deployment. By focusing on improving relevance signals beyond just clicks and incorporating a broader range of user feedback, future unbiased LTR approaches can be better equipped to deliver high-quality search results at scale.
Overall, this paper highlights the critical need for close collaboration between academic researchers and industry practitioners to ensure the development of effective, deployable solutions for unbiased learning to rank.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Unbiased Learning to Rank Meets Reality: Lessons from Baidu's Large-Scale Search Dataset
Philipp Hager, Romain Deffayet, Jean-Michel Renders, Onno Zoeter, Maarten de Rijke
Unbiased learning-to-rank (ULTR) is a well-established framework for learning from user clicks, which are often biased by the ranker collecting the data. While theoretically justified and extensively tested in simulation, ULTR techniques lack empirical validation, especially on modern search engines. The Baidu-ULTR dataset released for the WSDM Cup 2023, collected from Baidu's search engine, offers a rare opportunity to assess the real-world performance of prominent ULTR techniques. Despite multiple submissions during the WSDM Cup 2023 and the subsequent NTCIR ULTRE-2 task, it remains unclear whether the observed improvements stem from applying ULTR or other learning techniques. In this work, we revisit and extend the available experiments on the Baidu-ULTR dataset. We find that standard unbiased learning-to-rank techniques robustly improve click predictions but struggle to consistently improve ranking performance, especially considering the stark differences obtained by choice of ranking loss and query-document features. Our experiments reveal that gains in click prediction do not necessarily translate to enhanced ranking performance on expert relevance annotations, implying that conclusions strongly depend on how success is measured in this benchmark.
Read more5/16/2024
🚀
0
Whole Page Unbiased Learning to Rank
Haitao Mao, Lixin Zou, Yujia Zheng, Jiliang Tang, Xiaokai Chu, Jiashu Zhao, Qian Wang, Dawei Yin
The page presentation biases in the information retrieval system, especially on the click behavior, is a well-known challenge that hinders improving ranking models' performance with implicit user feedback. Unbiased Learning to Rank~(ULTR) algorithms are then proposed to learn an unbiased ranking model with biased click data. However, most existing algorithms are specifically designed to mitigate position-related bias, e.g., trust bias, without considering biases induced by other features in search result page presentation(SERP), e.g. attractive bias induced by the multimedia. Unfortunately, those biases widely exist in industrial systems and may lead to an unsatisfactory search experience. Therefore, we introduce a new problem, i.e., whole-page Unbiased Learning to Rank(WP-ULTR), aiming to handle biases induced by whole-page SERP features simultaneously. It presents tremendous challenges: (1) a suitable user behavior model (user behavior hypothesis) can be hard to find; and (2) complex biases cannot be handled by existing algorithms. To address the above challenges, we propose a Bias Agnostic whole-page unbiased Learning to rank algorithm, named BAL, to automatically find the user behavior model with causal discovery and mitigate the biases induced by multiple SERP features with no specific design. Experimental results on a real-world dataset verify the effectiveness of the BAL.
Read more6/14/2024
0
Contextual Dual Learning Algorithm with Listwise Distillation for Unbiased Learning to Rank
Lulu Yu, Keping Bi, Shiyu Ni, Jiafeng Guo
Unbiased Learning to Rank (ULTR) aims to leverage biased implicit user feedback (e.g., click) to optimize an unbiased ranking model. The effectiveness of the existing ULTR methods has primarily been validated on synthetic datasets. However, their performance on real-world click data remains unclear. Recently, Baidu released a large publicly available dataset of their web search logs. Subsequently, the NTCIR-17 ULTRE-2 task released a subset dataset extracted from it. We conduct experiments on commonly used or effective ULTR methods on this subset to determine whether they maintain their effectiveness. In this paper, we propose a Contextual Dual Learning Algorithm with Listwise Distillation (CDLA-LD) to simultaneously address both position bias and contextual bias. We utilize a listwise-input ranking model to obtain reconstructed feature vectors incorporating local contextual information and employ the Dual Learning Algorithm (DLA) method to jointly train this ranking model and a propensity model to address position bias. As this ranking model learns the interaction information within the documents list of the training set, to enhance the ranking model's generalization ability, we additionally train a pointwise-input ranking model to learn the listwise-input ranking model's capability for relevance judgment in a listwise manner. Extensive experiments and analysis confirm the effectiveness of our approach.
Read more8/20/2024
🤖
0
Identifiability Matters: Revealing the Hidden Recoverable Condition in Unbiased Learning to Rank
Mouxiang Chen, Chenghao Liu, Zemin Liu, Zhuo Li, Jianling Sun
Unbiased Learning to Rank (ULTR) aims to train unbiased ranking models from biased click logs, by explicitly modeling a generation process for user behavior and fitting click data based on examination hypothesis. Previous research found empirically that the true latent relevance is mostly recoverable through click fitting. However, we demonstrate that this is not always achievable, resulting in a significant reduction in ranking performance. This research investigates the conditions under which relevance can be recovered from click data in the first principle. We initially characterize a ranking model as identifiable if it can recover the true relevance up to a scaling transformation, a criterion sufficient for the pairwise ranking objective. Subsequently, we investigate an equivalent condition for identifiability, articulated as a graph connectivity test problem: the recovery of relevance is feasible if and only if the identifiability graph (IG), derived from the underlying structure of the dataset, is connected. The presence of a disconnected IG may lead to degenerate cases and suboptimal ranking performance. To tackle this challenge, we introduce two methods, namely node intervention and node merging, designed to modify the dataset and restore the connectivity of the IG. Empirical results derived from a simulated dataset and two real-world LTR benchmark datasets not only validate our proposed theory but also demonstrate the effectiveness of our methods in alleviating data bias when the relevance model is unidentifiable.
Read more5/27/2024