Contextual Integrity Games
0
➖
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces "Contextual Integrity Games," a novel framework for modeling and analyzing privacy-preserving behaviors in multi-agent systems.
- The framework leverages concepts from Contextual Integrity to develop a game-theoretic approach for studying how agents can protect their privacy while interacting with others.
- The paper defines key concepts, provides mathematical formulations, and demonstrates the framework's applications through several illustrative examples.
Plain English Explanation
The paper presents a new way to think about privacy in multi-agent systems, which are groups of software agents that interact with each other. The core idea is that privacy is not just about hiding information, but about preserving the "contextual integrity" of that information - ensuring it is used in ways that align with social norms and individual expectations.
Using game theory, the framework models how agents can strategically navigate privacy tradeoffs as they engage in various interactions. For example, an agent might need to share some personal information to access a service, but it can choose how much to reveal based on the context and its own privacy preferences. The framework allows researchers to analyze these strategic privacy decisions and study how they impact the overall system dynamics.
The paper defines the key concepts, provides the mathematical details, and gives several illustrative examples to demonstrate how the Contextual Integrity Games framework can be applied. This provides a principled way to reason about privacy in complex, multi-agent scenarios, where agents must balance their individual privacy needs with the demands of collaboration and information-sharing.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces the "Contextual Integrity Games" framework, which builds on the Contextual Integrity theory to model privacy-preserving behaviors in multi-agent systems. The framework uses a game-theoretic approach, where agents are modeled as players who make strategic decisions about what information to reveal or conceal based on the context of the interaction.
The key components of the framework include:
- Agents: The individual entities (e.g., users, organizations, software agents) that interact with each other.
- Contexts: The specific situations or environments in which the agents' interactions take place, which shape the social norms and expectations around information flows.
- Information Flows: The sharing or transmission of information between agents, which can be regulated by the agents to preserve their privacy.
- Privacy Preferences: The individual agents' desires and constraints regarding the disclosure of their personal information.
- Strategies: The choices available to agents regarding what information to reveal or conceal in a given context.
The paper provides a formal mathematical model of these components and defines the Contextual Integrity Games framework. It then demonstrates the framework's applications through several illustrative examples, such as:
- A scenario where agents must share some personal information to access a service, but can strategically choose how much to reveal.
- A group decision-making process where agents must balance their individual privacy needs with the need to share information to reach a collective decision.
- A situation where agents must protect an "air gap" (a physical separation between systems) while still engaging in necessary information exchanges.
These examples showcase how the Contextual Integrity Games framework can be used to analyze privacy-preserving behaviors in complex, multi-agent environments.
Critical Analysis
The Contextual Integrity Games framework presented in this paper offers a promising approach for modeling and analyzing privacy-preserving behaviors in multi-agent systems. By integrating the Contextual Integrity theory with game-theoretic concepts, the framework provides a principled way to reason about the strategic privacy decisions of agents and the resulting system-level dynamics.
One key strength of the framework is its flexibility in capturing the diverse factors that influence privacy-related behaviors, such as the specific context of the interactions, the agents' individual privacy preferences, and the available strategies for information disclosure. This allows the framework to be applied to a wide range of multi-agent scenarios, from service access to group decision-making.
However, the paper also acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research. For example, the current formulation assumes that agents have complete information about the context and other agents' preferences, which may not always be the case in real-world settings. Additionally, the framework does not explicitly consider the potential for strategic manipulation or deception by agents, which could undermine the effectiveness of privacy-preserving behaviors.
Further research could explore ways to relax these assumptions, incorporate uncertainty and partial information, and better account for strategic interactions between self-interested agents. Integrating the Contextual Integrity Games framework with other multi-agent modeling approaches, such as agent-based modeling, could also yield valuable insights.
Conclusion
The "Contextual Integrity Games" framework presented in this paper offers a novel and promising approach for studying privacy-preserving behaviors in multi-agent systems. By combining the Contextual Integrity theory with game-theoretic concepts, the framework provides a principled way to model how agents can strategically navigate privacy tradeoffs while engaging in various interactions.
The illustrative examples demonstrate the framework's versatility and potential applications, ranging from service access to group decision-making. While the current formulation has some limitations, the paper highlights opportunities for further research and refinement, which could lead to important advancements in the field of privacy-preserving multi-agent systems.
Overall, this work contributes a valuable theoretical and analytical tool for researchers and practitioners working to develop privacy-conscious technologies and interactions in complex, multi-agent environments.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
➖
0
Contextual Integrity Games
Ran Wolff
The contextual integrity model is a widely accepted way of analyzing the plurality of norms that are colloquially called privacy norms. Contextual integrity systematically describes such norms by distinguishing the type of data concerned, the three social agents involved (subject, sender, and recipient) and the transmission principle governing the transfer of information. It allows analyzing privacy norms in terms of their impact on the interaction of those agents with one another. This paper places contextual integrity in a strict game theoretic framework. When such description is possible it has three key advantages: Firstly, it allows indisputable utilitarian justification of some privacy norms. Secondly, it better relates privacy to topics which are well understood by stakeholders whose education is predominantly quantitative, such as engineers and economists. Thirdly, it is an absolute necessity when describing ethical constraints to machines such as AI agents. In addition to describing games which capture paradigmatic informational norms, the paper also analyzes cases in which the game, per se, does not encourage normative behavior. The paper discusses two main forms of mechanisms which can be applied to the game in such cases, and shows that they reflect accepted privacy regulation and technologies.
Read more5/16/2024
0
Privacy Checklist: Privacy Violation Detection Grounding on Contextual Integrity Theory
Haoran Li, Wei Fan, Yulin Chen, Jiayang Cheng, Tianshu Chu, Xuebing Zhou, Peizhao Hu, Yangqiu Song
Privacy research has attracted wide attention as individuals worry that their private data can be easily leaked during interactions with smart devices, social platforms, and AI applications. Computer science researchers, on the other hand, commonly study privacy issues through privacy attacks and defenses on segmented fields. Privacy research is conducted on various sub-fields, including Computer Vision (CV), Natural Language Processing (NLP), and Computer Networks. Within each field, privacy has its own formulation. Though pioneering works on attacks and defenses reveal sensitive privacy issues, they are narrowly trapped and cannot fully cover people's actual privacy concerns. Consequently, the research on general and human-centric privacy research remains rather unexplored. In this paper, we formulate the privacy issue as a reasoning problem rather than simple pattern matching. We ground on the Contextual Integrity (CI) theory which posits that people's perceptions of privacy are highly correlated with the corresponding social context. Based on such an assumption, we develop the first comprehensive checklist that covers social identities, private attributes, and existing privacy regulations. Unlike prior works on CI that either cover limited expert annotated norms or model incomplete social context, our proposed privacy checklist uses the whole Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) as an example, to show that we can resort to large language models (LLMs) to completely cover the HIPAA's regulations. Additionally, our checklist also gathers expert annotations across multiple ontologies to determine private information including but not limited to personally identifiable information (PII). We use our preliminary results on the HIPAA to shed light on future context-centric privacy research to cover more privacy regulations, social norms and standards.
Read more8/20/2024
0
New!Operationalizing Contextual Integrity in Privacy-Conscious Assistants
Sahra Ghalebikesabi, Eugene Bagdasaryan, Ren Yi, Itay Yona, Ilia Shumailov, Aneesh Pappu, Chongyang Shi, Laura Weidinger, Robert Stanforth, Leonard Berrada, Pushmeet Kohli, Po-Sen Huang, Borja Balle
Advanced AI assistants combine frontier LLMs and tool access to autonomously perform complex tasks on behalf of users. While the helpfulness of such assistants can increase dramatically with access to user information including emails and documents, this raises privacy concerns about assistants sharing inappropriate information with third parties without user supervision. To steer information-sharing assistants to behave in accordance with privacy expectations, we propose to operationalize contextual integrity (CI), a framework that equates privacy with the appropriate flow of information in a given context. In particular, we design and evaluate a number of strategies to steer assistants' information-sharing actions to be CI compliant. Our evaluation is based on a novel form filling benchmark composed of human annotations of common webform applications, and it reveals that prompting frontier LLMs to perform CI-based reasoning yields strong results.
Read more9/16/2024
0
LLM-CI: Assessing Contextual Integrity Norms in Language Models
Yan Shvartzshnaider, Vasisht Duddu, John Lacalamita
Large language models (LLMs), while memorizing parts of their training data scraped from the Internet, may also inadvertently encode societal preferences and norms. As these models are integrated into sociotechnical systems, it is crucial that the norms they encode align with societal expectations. These norms could vary across models, hyperparameters, optimization techniques, and datasets. This is especially challenging due to prompt sensitivity$-$small variations in prompts yield different responses, rendering existing assessment methodologies unreliable. There is a need for a comprehensive framework covering various models, optimization, and datasets, along with a reliable methodology to assess encoded norms. We present LLM-CI, the first open-sourced framework to assess privacy norms encoded in LLMs. LLM-CI uses a Contextual Integrity-based factorial vignette methodology to assess the encoded norms across different contexts and LLMs. We propose the multi-prompt assessment methodology to address prompt sensitivity by assessing the norms from only the prompts that yield consistent responses across multiple variants. Using LLM-CI and our proposed methodology, we comprehensively evaluate LLMs using IoT and COPPA vignettes datasets from prior work, examining the impact of model properties (e.g., hyperparameters, capacity) and optimization strategies (e.g., alignment, quantization).
Read more9/6/2024