Privacy Checklist: Privacy Violation Detection Grounding on Contextual Integrity Theory
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a privacy checklist for detecting potential privacy violations based on the theory of contextual integrity.
- The checklist aims to provide a structured approach for analyzing whether an AI system's data collection and use practices align with the contextual norms and expectations of the users.
- The authors ground their work in the theory of contextual integrity, which emphasizes that privacy is determined by the appropriate flow of information within a given context.
Plain English Explanation
The paper presents a privacy checklist that can help identify potential privacy issues with AI systems. The key idea is that privacy is not just about keeping data secret, but about ensuring that information flows in a way that aligns with the expectations and norms of the users within a particular context.
For example, people may be comfortable sharing certain personal details with their doctor, but not with a stranger on the street. The contextual integrity theory suggests that privacy violations occur when information is collected, used, or shared in a way that violates these contextual norms.
The privacy checklist proposed in this paper provides a structured way to analyze an AI system and assess whether its data practices are appropriate for the given context. This could help developers and researchers catch potential privacy issues before deploying their systems, ensuring a better alignment with user expectations.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by grounding its work in the theory of contextual integrity, which states that privacy is determined by the appropriate flow of information within a given context. The authors argue that this theory provides a more nuanced understanding of privacy compared to traditional notions of data confidentiality.
The core of the paper is the proposed privacy checklist, which consists of a series of questions designed to analyze an AI system's data collection and use practices. These questions cover aspects such as the type of information collected, the context in which it is gathered, the actors involved, and the transmission principles governing how the data is shared.
The authors demonstrate the application of the checklist through a case study involving a hypothetical AI-powered personal assistant. They walk through the checklist, highlighting how it can uncover potential privacy violations by identifying misalignments between the system's data practices and the users' contextual expectations.
Critical Analysis
The privacy checklist presented in this paper provides a promising approach for grounding privacy analysis in the theory of contextual integrity. By focusing on the contextual appropriateness of data flows, rather than just data confidentiality, the checklist offers a more comprehensive way to assess the privacy implications of AI systems.
However, the paper does not address the potential challenges in applying the checklist in practice. For example, it may be difficult to precisely define the relevant contexts and their associated norms, especially in complex, multi-stakeholder AI systems. Additionally, the checklist may need to be adapted to account for differences in cultural and societal expectations around privacy.
Further research could explore ways to operationalize the contextual integrity theory more effectively, perhaps through the development of automated tools or standardized frameworks for applying the privacy checklist. Empirical studies evaluating the checklist's effectiveness in real-world scenarios would also be valuable.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a privacy checklist that aims to detect potential privacy violations in AI systems by grounding the analysis in the theory of contextual integrity. This approach offers a more nuanced understanding of privacy, focusing on the appropriate flow of information within a given context rather than just data confidentiality.
The proposed checklist provides a structured way for developers and researchers to assess the privacy implications of their AI systems before deployment, helping to ensure better alignment with user expectations. While the paper presents a promising concept, further research is needed to address the practical challenges of applying the contextual integrity theory in complex, real-world scenarios.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Privacy Checklist: Privacy Violation Detection Grounding on Contextual Integrity Theory
Haoran Li, Wei Fan, Yulin Chen, Jiayang Cheng, Tianshu Chu, Xuebing Zhou, Peizhao Hu, Yangqiu Song
Privacy research has attracted wide attention as individuals worry that their private data can be easily leaked during interactions with smart devices, social platforms, and AI applications. Computer science researchers, on the other hand, commonly study privacy issues through privacy attacks and defenses on segmented fields. Privacy research is conducted on various sub-fields, including Computer Vision (CV), Natural Language Processing (NLP), and Computer Networks. Within each field, privacy has its own formulation. Though pioneering works on attacks and defenses reveal sensitive privacy issues, they are narrowly trapped and cannot fully cover people's actual privacy concerns. Consequently, the research on general and human-centric privacy research remains rather unexplored. In this paper, we formulate the privacy issue as a reasoning problem rather than simple pattern matching. We ground on the Contextual Integrity (CI) theory which posits that people's perceptions of privacy are highly correlated with the corresponding social context. Based on such an assumption, we develop the first comprehensive checklist that covers social identities, private attributes, and existing privacy regulations. Unlike prior works on CI that either cover limited expert annotated norms or model incomplete social context, our proposed privacy checklist uses the whole Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) as an example, to show that we can resort to large language models (LLMs) to completely cover the HIPAA's regulations. Additionally, our checklist also gathers expert annotations across multiple ontologies to determine private information including but not limited to personally identifiable information (PII). We use our preliminary results on the HIPAA to shed light on future context-centric privacy research to cover more privacy regulations, social norms and standards.
Read more8/20/2024
0
New!Operationalizing Contextual Integrity in Privacy-Conscious Assistants
Sahra Ghalebikesabi, Eugene Bagdasaryan, Ren Yi, Itay Yona, Ilia Shumailov, Aneesh Pappu, Chongyang Shi, Laura Weidinger, Robert Stanforth, Leonard Berrada, Pushmeet Kohli, Po-Sen Huang, Borja Balle
Advanced AI assistants combine frontier LLMs and tool access to autonomously perform complex tasks on behalf of users. While the helpfulness of such assistants can increase dramatically with access to user information including emails and documents, this raises privacy concerns about assistants sharing inappropriate information with third parties without user supervision. To steer information-sharing assistants to behave in accordance with privacy expectations, we propose to operationalize contextual integrity (CI), a framework that equates privacy with the appropriate flow of information in a given context. In particular, we design and evaluate a number of strategies to steer assistants' information-sharing actions to be CI compliant. Our evaluation is based on a novel form filling benchmark composed of human annotations of common webform applications, and it reveals that prompting frontier LLMs to perform CI-based reasoning yields strong results.
Read more9/16/2024
➖
0
Contextual Integrity Games
Ran Wolff
The contextual integrity model is a widely accepted way of analyzing the plurality of norms that are colloquially called privacy norms. Contextual integrity systematically describes such norms by distinguishing the type of data concerned, the three social agents involved (subject, sender, and recipient) and the transmission principle governing the transfer of information. It allows analyzing privacy norms in terms of their impact on the interaction of those agents with one another. This paper places contextual integrity in a strict game theoretic framework. When such description is possible it has three key advantages: Firstly, it allows indisputable utilitarian justification of some privacy norms. Secondly, it better relates privacy to topics which are well understood by stakeholders whose education is predominantly quantitative, such as engineers and economists. Thirdly, it is an absolute necessity when describing ethical constraints to machines such as AI agents. In addition to describing games which capture paradigmatic informational norms, the paper also analyzes cases in which the game, per se, does not encourage normative behavior. The paper discusses two main forms of mechanisms which can be applied to the game in such cases, and shows that they reflect accepted privacy regulation and technologies.
Read more5/16/2024
0
LLM-CI: Assessing Contextual Integrity Norms in Language Models
Yan Shvartzshnaider, Vasisht Duddu, John Lacalamita
Large language models (LLMs), while memorizing parts of their training data scraped from the Internet, may also inadvertently encode societal preferences and norms. As these models are integrated into sociotechnical systems, it is crucial that the norms they encode align with societal expectations. These norms could vary across models, hyperparameters, optimization techniques, and datasets. This is especially challenging due to prompt sensitivity$-$small variations in prompts yield different responses, rendering existing assessment methodologies unreliable. There is a need for a comprehensive framework covering various models, optimization, and datasets, along with a reliable methodology to assess encoded norms. We present LLM-CI, the first open-sourced framework to assess privacy norms encoded in LLMs. LLM-CI uses a Contextual Integrity-based factorial vignette methodology to assess the encoded norms across different contexts and LLMs. We propose the multi-prompt assessment methodology to address prompt sensitivity by assessing the norms from only the prompts that yield consistent responses across multiple variants. Using LLM-CI and our proposed methodology, we comprehensively evaluate LLMs using IoT and COPPA vignettes datasets from prior work, examining the impact of model properties (e.g., hyperparameters, capacity) and optimization strategies (e.g., alignment, quantization).
Read more9/6/2024