On the convergence of adaptive first order methods: proximal gradient and alternating minimization algorithms

Overview

• This paper proposes a new framework called adaPG^{q,r} that builds upon recent work on linesearch-free adaptive proximal gradient methods.
• The framework unifies and extends existing results by providing larger stepsize policies and improved lower bounds.
• The paper explores different choices of the parameters q and r and demonstrates the efficacy of the resulting methods through numerical simulations.
• The convergence of the framework is established in a more general setting that allows for time-varying parameters.
• An adaptive alternating minimization algorithm is presented by exploring the dual setting, which incorporates additional adaptivity and expands the applicability beyond standard strongly convex settings.

Plain English Explanation

The paper discusses a new method called adaPG^{q,r} that is an extension of previous work on linesearch-free adaptive proximal gradient methods. This new framework provides larger step sizes and better performance guarantees compared to the previous methods.

The authors explore different settings of the parameters q and r in their framework and show through experiments that the resulting methods work well. They also prove that the framework converges in a more general setting where the parameters can change over time.

Finally, the paper presents an adaptive alternating minimization algorithm that builds on the adaPG^{q,r} framework. This new algorithm is not limited to strongly convex problems, unlike some previous methods, and incorporates additional adaptivity features.

Technical Explanation

The paper builds upon recent work on linesearch-free adaptive proximal gradient methods and proposes the adaPG^{q,r} framework, which unifies and extends these existing results.

The key aspects of the adaPG^{q,r} framework are:

• It provides larger stepsize policies and improved lower bounds compared to previous methods.
• The authors explore different choices of the parameters q and r and demonstrate the efficacy of the resulting methods through numerical simulations.
• The convergence of the framework is established in a more general setting that allows for time-varying parameters, going beyond the standard strongly convex setting.

The paper also presents an adaptive alternating minimization algorithm that builds on the adaPG^{q,r} framework. This algorithm:

• Incorporates additional adaptivity features.
• Expands the applicability of the framework beyond standard strongly convex settings, as shown in the linear convergence of forward-backward accelerated algorithms without strongconvexity and non-convex pose graph optimization in SLAM settings.

Critical Analysis

The paper introduces a well-designed framework that builds upon and extends previous work on adaptive proximal gradient methods. The authors have thoughtfully explored different parameter settings and provided a more general convergence analysis, which is a strength of the research.

However, the paper does not address potential limitations or caveats of the adaPG^{q,r} framework. For example, it would be helpful to understand the computational complexity of the method and how it compares to other adaptive gradient algorithms, such as those that use Polyak step size adaptation.

Additionally, the authors could have provided more intuition or discussion around the practical implications of the framework and the adaptive alternating minimization algorithm. It would be useful to understand the types of real-world problems where these methods would be most beneficial and how they compare to existing approaches.

Overall, the paper presents a solid theoretical contribution, but could be strengthened by a more comprehensive discussion of the practical considerations and limitations of the proposed techniques.

Conclusion

This paper introduces the adaPG^{q,r} framework, which extends previous work on adaptive proximal gradient methods. The framework provides larger stepsizes and improved performance guarantees, and the authors explore different parameter settings to demonstrate its efficacy.

The paper also presents an adaptive alternating minimization algorithm that builds on the adaPG^{q,r} framework and expands its applicability beyond standard strongly convex settings. This work advances the state of the art in adaptive optimization methods and could have important implications for a wide range of machine learning and optimization problems.