Convergence of ease-controlled Random Reshuffling gradient Algorithms under Lipschitz smoothness

Read original: arXiv:2212.01848 - Published 5/22/2024 by Ruggiero Seccia, Corrado Coppola, Giampaolo Liuzzi, Laura Palagi
Total Score

0

๐Ÿ‹๏ธ

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper focuses on optimizing the average of a large number of smooth and non-convex functions, a common problem in machine learning.
  • It examines two widely used optimization frameworks: Incremental Gradient (IG) and Random Reshuffling (RR).
  • The authors propose "ease-controlled" modifications to these schemes that require minimal additional computation but can be proven to converge under weak assumptions.
  • The new algorithms use a "watchdog rule" and a derivative-free line search that activate only occasionally to ensure convergence.
  • The authors compare their algorithms to full batch gradient methods and existing IG/RR implementations, showing similar computational effort but potentially faster objective function decrease.

Plain English Explanation

In machine learning, we often need to minimize the average of a very large number of functions. This is a challenging optimization problem, especially when the functions are smooth but not convex. Two common approaches to tackle this are Incremental Gradient (IG) and Random Reshuffling (RR).

The researchers in this paper propose modifications to IG and RR that are "easy to control." This means they require only a small amount of extra computation but can still be proven to converge under fairly weak assumptions. The key ideas are:

  1. Watchdog rule: The algorithms use a rule that "watches" the progress of the optimization and only performs more expensive computations (like line searches) when necessary to ensure convergence.

  2. Adaptive step size: Instead of using pre-set rules that can make the step size decrease too quickly, the new algorithms adaptively update the step size in a way that allows for faster objective function decrease.

The researchers compare their new algorithms to both full batch gradient methods (like L-BFGS) and existing IG/RR implementations. They find that their algorithms require a similar amount of computational effort as the other online (IG/RR) methods, but the step size control allows the objective function to decrease faster.

Technical Explanation

The paper considers the optimization problem of minimizing the average of a very large number of smooth, potentially non-convex functions. This is a common scenario in machine learning, where we often need to optimize complex objective functions over large datasets.

The authors focus on two popular optimization frameworks for this problem: Incremental Gradient (IG) and Random Reshuffling (RR). They propose "ease-controlled" modifications to these schemes that require minimal additional computational effort but can be proven to converge under weak assumptions, such as Lipschitz continuity of the gradients.

The key ideas behind the new algorithms are:

  1. Watchdog rule: The IG/RR iteration is controlled by a watchdog rule that triggers more expensive computations (like line searches) only when necessary to ensure convergence. This allows for faster progress during the optimization.

  2. Adaptive step size: The algorithms also include a mechanism to adaptively update the step size used in the main IG/RR iteration, avoiding the use of pre-set rules that can drive the step size to zero too quickly. This step size control helps the objective function decrease faster.

The authors implement their new algorithms and compare them to both a full batch gradient method (L-BFGS) and existing IG/RR implementations. They find that their algorithms require a similar computational effort to the other online (IG/RR) methods but can achieve faster objective function decrease due to the step size control.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a solid theoretical analysis, proving convergence of the proposed algorithms under weak assumptions. However, the practical significance of the step size control mechanism is not fully explored. While the authors show faster objective function decrease, it would be helpful to understand the impact on overall training time and final model performance, especially on large-scale deep learning tasks.

Additionally, the paper does not discuss the sensitivity of the new algorithms to hyperparameter choices, such as the specific parameters used in the watchdog rule and line search. It would be valuable to understand how robust the algorithms are to these settings and provide guidance on tuning them effectively.

Furthermore, the authors compare their methods to existing IG/RR implementations but do not explore more recent advances in stochastic optimization, such as Random Scaling and Momentum or other adaptive step size techniques. Comparing the proposed algorithms to a broader set of state-of-the-art methods would strengthen the conclusions.

Overall, the research presented in the paper is a valuable contribution to the field of large-scale optimization, but further exploration of the practical implications and comparisons to newer methods could provide additional insights.

Conclusion

This paper tackles the challenging problem of minimizing the average of a very large number of smooth, non-convex functions, a common scenario in machine learning. The authors propose "ease-controlled" modifications to two widely used optimization frameworks, Incremental Gradient (IG) and Random Reshuffling (RR), that require minimal additional computation but can be proven to converge under weak assumptions.

The key ideas behind the new algorithms are a "watchdog rule" that triggers more expensive computations only when necessary to ensure convergence, and an adaptive mechanism for updating the step size used in the main IG/RR iteration. Experimental results show that these algorithms can achieve similar computational effort as existing IG/RR methods while potentially allowing for faster objective function decrease.

While the theoretical analysis is sound, further exploration of the practical implications and comparisons to more recent stochastic optimization techniques could provide additional insights. Nevertheless, this research represents a valuable contribution to the field of large-scale optimization, with potential applications in a wide range of machine learning tasks.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on ๐• โ†’

Related Papers

๐Ÿ‹๏ธ

Total Score

0

Convergence of ease-controlled Random Reshuffling gradient Algorithms under Lipschitz smoothness

Ruggiero Seccia, Corrado Coppola, Giampaolo Liuzzi, Laura Palagi

In this work, we consider minimizing the average of a very large number of smooth and possibly non-convex functions, and we focus on two widely used minibatch frameworks to tackle this optimization problem: Incremental Gradient (IG) and Random Reshuffling (RR). We define ease-controlled modifications of the IG/RR schemes, which require a light additional computational effort {but} can be proved to converge under {weak} and standard assumptions. In particular, we define two algorithmic schemes in which the IG/RR iteration is controlled by using a watchdog rule and a derivative-free linesearch that activates only sporadically to guarantee convergence. The two schemes differ in the watchdog and the linesearch, which are performed using either a monotonic or a non-monotonic rule. The two schemes also allow controlling the updating of the stepsize used in the main IG/RR iteration, avoiding the use of pre-set rules that may drive the stepsize to zero too fast, reducing the effort in designing effective updating rules of the stepsize. We prove convergence under the mild assumption of Lipschitz continuity of the gradients of the component functions and perform extensive computational analysis using different deep neural architectures and a benchmark of varying-size datasets. We compare our implementation with both a full batch gradient method (i.e. L-BFGS) and an implementation of IG/RR methods, proving that our algorithms require a similar computational effort compared to the other online algorithms and that the control on the learning rate may allow a faster decrease of the objective function.

Read more

5/22/2024

๐Ÿ’ฌ

Total Score

0

On the Last-Iterate Convergence of Shuffling Gradient Methods

Zijian Liu, Zhengyuan Zhou

Shuffling gradient methods are widely used in modern machine learning tasks and include three popular implementations: Random Reshuffle (RR), Shuffle Once (SO), and Incremental Gradient (IG). Compared to the empirical success, the theoretical guarantee of shuffling gradient methods was not well-understood for a long time. Until recently, the convergence rates had just been established for the average iterate for convex functions and the last iterate for strongly convex problems (using squared distance as the metric). However, when using the function value gap as the convergence criterion, existing theories cannot interpret the good performance of the last iterate in different settings (e.g., constrained optimization). To bridge this gap between practice and theory, we prove the first last-iterate convergence rates for shuffling gradient methods with respect to the objective value even without strong convexity. Our new results either (nearly) match the existing last-iterate lower bounds or are as fast as the previous best upper bounds for the average iterate.

Read more

6/7/2024

๐Ÿ› ๏ธ

Total Score

0

A New Random Reshuffling Method for Nonsmooth Nonconvex Finite-sum Optimization

Junwen Qiu, Xiao Li, Andre Milzarek

Random reshuffling techniques are prevalent in large-scale applications, such as training neural networks. While the convergence and acceleration effects of random reshuffling-type methods are fairly well understood in the smooth setting, much less studies seem available in the nonsmooth case. In this work, we design a new normal map-based proximal random reshuffling (norm-PRR) method for nonsmooth nonconvex finite-sum problems. We show that norm-PRR achieves the iteration complexity $O(n^{-1/3}T^{-2/3})$ where $n$ denotes the number of component functions $f(cdot,i)$ and $T$ counts the total number of iterations. This improves the currently known complexity bounds for this class of problems by a factor of $n^{-1/3}$. In addition, we prove that norm-PRR converges linearly under the (global) Polyak-Lojasiewicz condition and in the interpolation setting. We further complement these non-asymptotic results and provide an in-depth analysis of the asymptotic properties of norm-PRR. Specifically, under the (local) Kurdyka-Lojasiewicz inequality, the whole sequence of iterates generated by norm-PRR is shown to converge to a single stationary point. Moreover, we derive last iterate convergence rates that can match those in the smooth, strongly convex setting. Finally, numerical experiments are performed on nonconvex classification tasks to illustrate the efficiency of the proposed approach.

Read more

5/1/2024

An Adaptive Stochastic Gradient Method with Non-negative Gauss-Newton Stepsizes
Total Score

1

An Adaptive Stochastic Gradient Method with Non-negative Gauss-Newton Stepsizes

Antonio Orvieto, Lin Xiao

We consider the problem of minimizing the average of a large number of smooth but possibly non-convex functions. In the context of most machine learning applications, each loss function is non-negative and thus can be expressed as the composition of a square and its real-valued square root. This reformulation allows us to apply the Gauss-Newton method, or the Levenberg-Marquardt method when adding a quadratic regularization. The resulting algorithm, while being computationally as efficient as the vanilla stochastic gradient method, is highly adaptive and can automatically warmup and decay the effective stepsize while tracking the non-negative loss landscape. We provide a tight convergence analysis, leveraging new techniques, in the stochastic convex and non-convex settings. In particular, in the convex case, the method does not require access to the gradient Lipshitz constant for convergence, and is guaranteed to never diverge. The convergence rates and empirical evaluations compare favorably to the classical (stochastic) gradient method as well as to several other adaptive methods.

Read more

7/8/2024