Copyright related risks in the creation and use of ML/AI systems
0
📉
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the copyright-related risks that Machine Learning (ML) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems, including Large Language Models (LLMs), face.
- It examines how these risks impact different stakeholders, such as the owners of training data copyrights, users of ML/AI systems, creators of trained models, and operators of AI systems.
- The paper also provides an overview of ongoing legal cases in the United States related to these copyright issues.
Plain English Explanation
When AI systems, like large language models, are trained on large datasets, there can be concerns about the copyright of the material used for training. The owners of the copyrighted data may have legal claims against the creators and users of these AI systems. Similarly, the AI system's creators could face legal issues from users who are negatively impacted by the system's outputs. This paper examines these various copyright challenges and legal risks for different parties involved in the AI ecosystem. It also looks at some specific legal cases in the United States that relate to these copyright concerns around AI.
Technical Explanation
The paper provides a comprehensive overview of the complex copyright-related issues surrounding the development and deployment of ML/AI systems, including LLMs. It examines the potential legal risks and liabilities for various stakeholders, such as:
- Owners of the copyrighted data used to train the AI systems, who may have claims against the system creators and users.
- Users of the ML/AI systems, who could be negatively impacted by the system's outputs and have legal recourse against the system's creators.
- Creators of the trained AI models, who may face legal challenges from both data owners and system users.
- Operators of the AI systems, who could be liable for how the systems are used.
The paper also delves into specific ongoing legal cases in the United States that illustrate these copyright concerns in the context of AI technologies.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough and well-researched examination of the copyright-related risks associated with ML/AI systems. However, it does not delve deeply into potential solutions or mitigation strategies that could address these challenges. The authors note the need for a "multidisciplinary approach" to tackle these complex, evolving issues, but more concrete proposals or frameworks could have been helpful.
Additionally, the paper focuses primarily on the legal landscape in the United States, and it would be valuable to understand how these copyright concerns are being addressed in other jurisdictions around the world.
Conclusion
This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the copyright-related risks that ML/AI systems, including LLMs, face. It highlights the potential legal liabilities for various stakeholders, such as data owners, system users, creators, and operators. By outlining these complex issues, the paper underscores the need for a multidisciplinary approach to address the evolving copyright challenges posed by the rapid advancements in AI technology.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
📉
0
Copyright related risks in the creation and use of ML/AI systems
Daniel M. German
This paper summarizes the current copyright related risks that Machine Learning (ML) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems (including Large Language Models --LLMs) incur. These risks affect different stakeholders: owners of the copyright of the training data, the users of ML/AI systems, the creators of trained models, and the operators of AI systems. This paper also provides an overview of ongoing legal cases in the United States related to these risks.
Read more5/6/2024
🤖
0
Uncertain Boundaries: Multidisciplinary Approaches to Copyright Issues in Generative AI
Jocelyn Dzuong, Zichong Wang, Wenbin Zhang
In the rapidly evolving landscape of generative artificial intelligence (AI), the increasingly pertinent issue of copyright infringement arises as AI advances to generate content from scraped copyrighted data, prompting questions about ownership and protection that impact professionals across various careers. With this in mind, this survey provides an extensive examination of copyright infringement as it pertains to generative AI, aiming to stay abreast of the latest developments and open problems. Specifically, it will first outline methods of detecting copyright infringement in mediums such as text, image, and video. Next, it will delve an exploration of existing techniques aimed at safeguarding copyrighted works from generative models. Furthermore, this survey will discuss resources and tools for users to evaluate copyright violations. Finally, insights into ongoing regulations and proposals for AI will be explored and compared. Through combining these disciplines, the implications of AI-driven content and copyright are thoroughly illustrated and brought into question.
Read more4/15/2024
0
An Economic Solution to Copyright Challenges of Generative AI
Jiachen T. Wang, Zhun Deng, Hiroaki Chiba-Okabe, Boaz Barak, Weijie J. Su
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) systems are trained on large data corpora to generate new pieces of text, images, videos, and other media. There is growing concern that such systems may infringe on the copyright interests of training data contributors. To address the copyright challenges of generative AI, we propose a framework that compensates copyright owners proportionally to their contributions to the creation of AI-generated content. The metric for contributions is quantitatively determined by leveraging the probabilistic nature of modern generative AI models and using techniques from cooperative game theory in economics. This framework enables a platform where AI developers benefit from access to high-quality training data, thus improving model performance. Meanwhile, copyright owners receive fair compensation, driving the continued provision of relevant data for generative model training. Experiments demonstrate that our framework successfully identifies the most relevant data sources used in artwork generation, ensuring a fair and interpretable distribution of revenues among copyright owners.
Read more9/10/2024
🤖
0
Between Copyright and Computer Science: The Law and Ethics of Generative AI
Deven R. Desai, Mark Riedl
Copyright and computer science continue to intersect and clash, but they can coexist. The advent of new technologies such as digitization of visual and aural creations, sharing technologies, search engines, social media offerings, and more challenge copyright-based industries and reopen questions about the reach of copyright law. Breakthroughs in artificial intelligence research, especially Large Language Models that leverage copyrighted material as part of training models, are the latest examples of the ongoing tension between copyright and computer science. The exuberance, rush-to-market, and edge problem cases created by a few misguided companies now raises challenges to core legal doctrines and may shift Open Internet practices for the worse. That result does not have to be, and should not be, the outcome. This Article shows that, contrary to some scholars' views, fair use law does not bless all ways that someone can gain access to copyrighted material even when the purpose is fair use. Nonetheless, the scientific need for more data to advance AI research means access to large book corpora and the Open Internet is vital for the future of that research. The copyright industry claims, however, that almost all uses of copyrighted material must be compensated, even for non-expressive uses. The Article's solution accepts that both sides need to change. It is one that forces the computer science world to discipline its behaviors and, in some cases, pay for copyrighted material. It also requires the copyright industry to abandon its belief that all uses must be compensated or restricted to uses sanctioned by the copyright industry. As part of this re-balancing, the Article addresses a problem that has grown out of this clash and under theorized.
Read more9/9/2024