Correcting the Mythos of KL-Regularization: Direct Alignment without Overparameterization via Chi-squared Preference Optimization
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper challenges the common belief that Kullback-Leibler (KL) regularization is necessary for aligning language models with a target distribution.
- The authors propose a new optimization method called "χ²-Preference Optimization" that can directly align models without the issues of overoptimization associated with KL regularization.
- The paper demonstrates that χ²-Preference Optimization outperforms KL-regularization on various offline preference learning benchmarks, including Generalized Preference Optimization - A Unified Approach to Offline Preference Learning, New Desiderata for Direct Preference Optimization, and Towards Robust Alignment: Distributionally Robustifying Language Models.
Plain English Explanation
The paper is challenging a common belief in the field of machine learning that a technique called Kullback-Leibler (KL) regularization is necessary for aligning language models with a target distribution. KL regularization is a way of penalizing the model if its output distribution deviates too much from a reference distribution.
The authors propose a new optimization method called "χ²-Preference Optimization" that can directly align models with the target distribution without the issues of overoptimization that can occur with KL regularization. Overoptimization means the model becomes too specialized on the target distribution and loses some of its general capabilities.
The paper shows that χ²-Preference Optimization outperforms KL-regularization on a number of different benchmarks for offline preference learning, where the goal is to learn a model that can predict human preferences. This includes benchmarks like New Desiderata for Direct Preference Optimization and Towards Robust Alignment: Distributionally Robustifying Language Models.
The key insight is that χ²-Preference Optimization can directly align the model with the target distribution without the risk of overoptimization that can happen with KL regularization. This is an important advance, as it means we may not need to rely on KL regularization to get language models to behave the way we want, which opens up new possibilities for learning your reference model real good and direct alignment of language models via quality-aware methods.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a new optimization method called "χ²-Preference Optimization" that can directly align language models with a target distribution without the issues of overoptimization associated with Kullback-Leibler (KL) regularization.
The key insight is that KL regularization, while effective at aligning models, can lead to overoptimization - the model becomes too specialized on the target distribution and loses some of its general capabilities. In contrast, the authors show that χ²-Preference Optimization can directly align the model without this risk of overoptimization.
Experiments on a range of offline preference learning benchmarks, including Generalized Preference Optimization, New Desiderata for Direct Preference Optimization, and Towards Robust Alignment, demonstrate the superior performance of χ²-Preference Optimization compared to KL-regularization.
The authors also discuss how this technique opens up new possibilities for methods like learning your reference model real good and direct alignment of language models via quality-aware that can directly optimize language models to match a target distribution without the drawbacks of KL regularization.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a compelling case against the conventional wisdom that KL regularization is necessary for aligning language models with a target distribution. The authors provide rigorous empirical evidence that their proposed χ²-Preference Optimization method can outperform KL regularization on a variety of offline preference learning benchmarks.
One potential limitation of the study is that it focuses primarily on offline preference learning tasks, and it's not clear how well the χ²-Preference Optimization method would generalize to other types of alignment problems or real-world applications. Further research would be needed to explore the broader applicability of this technique.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the theoretical underpinnings of χ²-Preference Optimization or provide a detailed analysis of why it is able to avoid the overoptimization issues associated with KL regularization. A more thorough exploration of the mathematical properties and assumptions of this method could help strengthen the claims and provide a deeper understanding of its advantages.
Overall, this paper presents an intriguing alternative to the established KL regularization approach and offers a promising new direction for research on direct model alignment. Readers are encouraged to think critically about the findings and consider how this work might inform the development of more robust and effective language model alignment techniques.
Conclusion
This paper challenges the common belief that Kullback-Leibler (KL) regularization is necessary for aligning language models with a target distribution. The authors propose a new optimization method called "χ²-Preference Optimization" that can directly align models without the issues of overoptimization associated with KL regularization.
Experiments on various offline preference learning benchmarks demonstrate the superior performance of χ²-Preference Optimization compared to KL-regularization. This work opens up new possibilities for methods like learning your reference model real good and direct alignment of language models via quality-aware that can directly optimize language models to match a target distribution without the drawbacks of KL regularization.
While further research is needed to explore the broader applicability of this technique, this paper represents an important advance in the field of language model alignment, and it encourages readers to think critically about the assumptions and limitations of established methods like KL regularization.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Correcting the Mythos of KL-Regularization: Direct Alignment without Overparameterization via Chi-squared Preference Optimization
Audrey Huang, Wenhao Zhan, Tengyang Xie, Jason D. Lee, Wen Sun, Akshay Krishnamurthy, Dylan J. Foster
Language model alignment methods, such as reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), have led to impressive advances in language model capabilities, but existing techniques are limited by a widely observed phenomenon known as overoptimization, where the quality of the language model plateaus or degrades over the course of the alignment process. Overoptimization is often attributed to overfitting to an inaccurate reward model, and while it can be mitigated through online data collection, this is infeasible in many settings. This raises a fundamental question: Do existing offline alignment algorithms make the most of the data they have, or can their sample-efficiency be improved further? We address this question with a new algorithm for offline alignment, $chi^2$-Preference Optimization ($chi$PO). $chi$PO is a one-line change to Direct Preference Optimization (DPO; Rafailov et al., 2023), which only involves modifying the logarithmic link function in the DPO objective. Despite this minimal change, $chi$PO implicitly implements the principle of pessimism in the face of uncertainty via regularization with the $chi^2$-divergence -- which quantifies uncertainty more effectively than KL-regularization -- and provably alleviates overoptimization, achieving sample-complexity guarantees based on single-policy concentrability -- the gold standard in offline reinforcement learning. $chi$PO's simplicity and strong guarantees make it the first practical and general-purpose offline alignment algorithm that is provably robust to overoptimization.
Read more7/23/2024
👨🏫
0
Generalized Preference Optimization: A Unified Approach to Offline Alignment
Yunhao Tang, Zhaohan Daniel Guo, Zeyu Zheng, Daniele Calandriello, R'emi Munos, Mark Rowland, Pierre Harvey Richemond, Michal Valko, Bernardo 'Avila Pires, Bilal Piot
Offline preference optimization allows fine-tuning large models directly from offline data, and has proved effective in recent alignment practices. We propose generalized preference optimization (GPO), a family of offline losses parameterized by a general class of convex functions. GPO enables a unified view over preference optimization, encompassing existing algorithms such as DPO, IPO and SLiC as special cases, while naturally introducing new variants. The GPO framework also sheds light on how offline algorithms enforce regularization, through the design of the convex function that defines the loss. Our analysis and experiments reveal the connections and subtle differences between the offline regularization and the KL divergence regularization intended by the canonical RLHF formulation. In a controlled setting akin to Gao et al 2023, we also show that different GPO variants achieve similar trade-offs between regularization and performance, though the optimal values of hyper-parameter might differ as predicted by theory. In all, our results present new algorithmic toolkits and empirical insights to alignment practitioners.
Read more5/30/2024
0
New!Orthogonal Finetuning for Direct Preference Optimization
Chenxu Yang, Ruipeng Jia, Naibin Gu, Zheng Lin, Siyuan Chen, Chao Pang, Weichong Yin, Yu Sun, Hua Wu, Weiping Wang
DPO is an effective preference optimization algorithm. However, the DPO-tuned models tend to overfit on the dispreferred samples, manifested as overly long generations lacking diversity. While recent regularization approaches have endeavored to alleviate this issue by modifying the objective function, they achieved that at the cost of alignment performance degradation. In this paper, we innovatively incorporate regularization from the perspective of weight updating to curb alignment overfitting. Through the pilot experiment, we discovered that there exists a positive correlation between overfitting and the hyperspherical energy fluctuation. Hence, we introduce orthogonal finetuning for DPO via a weight-Rotated Preference Optimization (RoPO) method, which merely conducts rotational and magnitude-stretching updates on the weight parameters to maintain the hyperspherical energy invariant, thereby preserving the knowledge encoded in the angle between neurons. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our model aligns perfectly with human preferences while retaining the original expressive capacity using only 0.0086% of the trainable parameters, suggesting an effective regularization against overfitting. Specifically, RoPO outperforms DPO by up to 10 points on MT-Bench and by up to 2.8 points on AlpacaEval 2, while enhancing the generation diversity by an average of 6 points.
Read more9/25/2024
0
New Desiderata for Direct Preference Optimization
Xiangkun Hu, Tong He, David Wipf
Large language models in the past have typically relied on some form of reinforcement learning with human feedback (RLHF) to better align model responses with human preferences. However, because of oft-observed instabilities when implementing these RLHF pipelines, various reparameterization techniques have recently been introduced to sidestep the need for separately learning an RL reward model. Instead, directly fine-tuning for human preferences is achieved via the minimization of a single closed-form training objective, a process originally referred to as direct preference optimization (DPO) and followed by several notable descendants. Although effective in certain real-world settings, we introduce new evaluation criteria that serve to highlight unresolved shortcomings in the ability of existing DPO methods to interpolate between a pre-trained reference model and empirical measures of human preferences, as well as unavoidable trade-offs in how low- and high-quality responses are regularized and constraints are handled. Our insights then motivate an alternative DPO-like loss that provably mitigates these limitations. Empirical results serve to corroborate notable aspects of our analyses.
Read more7/15/2024