CPL: Critical Planning Step Learning Boosts LLM Generalization in Reasoning Tasks
2
🛠️
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Large language models (LLMs) can be fine-tuned to develop reasoning capabilities across various domains.
- Existing methods focus on improving task-specific reasoning, but lack generalization to a broader range of reasoning tasks.
- This paper introduces two novel techniques to address this challenge: Critical Planning Step Learning (CPL) and Step-level Advantage Preference Optimization (Step-APO).
Plain English Explanation
The paper introduces two new techniques to help large language models (LLMs) become better at general reasoning tasks, not just specific ones.
Critical Planning Step Learning (CPL): This method uses Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) to explore different steps in multi-step reasoning problems. Based on the long-term outcomes, CPL learns which intermediate steps are most important for good planning. This improves the model's overall planning and reasoning capabilities.
Step-level Advantage Preference Optimization (Step-APO): Existing preference learning approaches like Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) struggle with complex multi-step reasoning tasks. Step-APO integrates an advantage estimate for each step's preference into the DPO process. This allows the model to better learn which intermediate steps are critical, further enhancing its general reasoning performance.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents two novel techniques to improve the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs):
-
Critical Planning Step Learning (CPL): CPL leverages Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) to explore diverse planning steps in multi-step reasoning tasks. By analyzing the long-term outcomes of these planning steps, CPL learns which intermediate steps are most critical for effective planning. This learned knowledge helps improve the model's overall planning and reasoning abilities.
-
Step-level Advantage Preference Optimization (Step-APO): Existing preference learning approaches, such as Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), struggle with complex multi-step reasoning tasks due to their inability to capture fine-grained supervision at each step. Step-APO integrates an advantage estimate for each step's preference, obtained via MCTS, into the DPO process. This enables the model to more effectively learn which intermediate planning steps are critical, leading to improved generalization in reasoning tasks.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a novel approach to enhancing the reasoning capabilities of large language models, which is an important challenge in the field of AI. The techniques of CPL and Step-APO appear to be well-designed and show promising results on various reasoning benchmarks.
However, the paper does not address potential limitations or caveats of the proposed methods. For example, the computational overhead of MCTS may limit the scalability of CPL, and the reliance on step-level advantage estimates in Step-APO may be sensitive to the quality of the MCTS exploration. Additionally, the paper does not discuss the impact of the training dataset size or diversity on the generalization performance of the models.
Further research could explore ways to mitigate the computational cost of CPL, perhaps by incorporating more efficient search strategies or approximations. Additionally, investigating the robustness of Step-APO to different MCTS configurations or exploring alternative step-level preference learning approaches could strengthen the proposed techniques.
Conclusion
This paper introduces two innovative methods, CPL and Step-APO, to improve the reasoning capabilities of large language models. By leveraging Monte Carlo Tree Search to learn critical planning steps and integrating step-level advantage estimates into preference optimization, the proposed techniques demonstrate significant performance gains on a variety of reasoning benchmarks.
These advancements in general reasoning skills could have far-reaching implications, enabling LLMs to tackle a broader range of complex problems with greater effectiveness. As the field of AI continues to evolve, techniques like CPL and Step-APO may become crucial for developing more versatile and capable language models that can truly excel at complex reasoning tasks.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🛠️
2
CPL: Critical Planning Step Learning Boosts LLM Generalization in Reasoning Tasks
Tianlong Wang, Xueting Han, Jing Bai
Post-training large language models (LLMs) to develop reasoning capabilities has proven effective across diverse domains, such as mathematical reasoning and code generation. However, existing methods primarily focus on improving task-specific reasoning but have not adequately addressed the model's generalization capabilities across a broader range of reasoning tasks. To tackle this challenge, we introduce Critical Planning Step Learning (CPL), which leverages Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) to explore diverse planning steps in multi-step reasoning tasks. Based on long-term outcomes, CPL learns step-level planning preferences to improve the model's planning capabilities and, consequently, its general reasoning capabilities. Furthermore, while effective in many scenarios for aligning LLMs, existing preference learning approaches like Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) struggle with complex multi-step reasoning tasks due to their inability to capture fine-grained supervision at each step. We propose Step-level Advantage Preference Optimization (Step-APO), which integrates an advantage estimate for step-level preference pairs obtained via MCTS into the DPO. This enables the model to more effectively learn critical intermediate planning steps, thereby further improving its generalization in reasoning tasks. Experimental results demonstrate that our method, trained exclusively on GSM8K and MATH, not only significantly improves performance on GSM8K (+10.5%) and MATH (+6.5%), but also enhances out-of-domain reasoning benchmarks, such as ARC-C (+4.0%), BBH (+1.8%), MMLU-STEM (+2.2%), and MMLU (+0.9%).
Read more9/16/2024
🔎
0
Monte Carlo Tree Search Boosts Reasoning via Iterative Preference Learning
Yuxi Xie, Anirudh Goyal, Wenyue Zheng, Min-Yen Kan, Timothy P. Lillicrap, Kenji Kawaguchi, Michael Shieh
We introduce an approach aimed at enhancing the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) through an iterative preference learning process inspired by the successful strategy employed by AlphaZero. Our work leverages Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) to iteratively collect preference data, utilizing its look-ahead ability to break down instance-level rewards into more granular step-level signals. To enhance consistency in intermediate steps, we combine outcome validation and stepwise self-evaluation, continually updating the quality assessment of newly generated data. The proposed algorithm employs Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) to update the LLM policy using this newly generated step-level preference data. Theoretical analysis reveals the importance of using on-policy sampled data for successful self-improving. Extensive evaluations on various arithmetic and commonsense reasoning tasks demonstrate remarkable performance improvements over existing models. For instance, our approach outperforms the Mistral-7B Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) baseline on GSM8K, MATH, and ARC-C, with substantial increases in accuracy to $81.8%$ (+$5.9%$), $34.7%$ (+$5.8%$), and $76.4%$ (+$15.8%$), respectively. Additionally, our research delves into the training and inference compute tradeoff, providing insights into how our method effectively maximizes performance gains. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/YuxiXie/MCTS-DPO.
Read more6/19/2024
✅
0
Learning Planning-based Reasoning by Trajectories Collection and Process Reward Synthesizing
Fangkai Jiao, Chengwei Qin, Zhengyuan Liu, Nancy F. Chen, Shafiq Joty
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant potential in handling complex reasoning tasks through step-by-step rationale generation. However, recent studies have raised concerns regarding the hallucination and flaws in their reasoning process. Substantial efforts are being made to improve the reliability and faithfulness of the generated rationales. Some approaches model reasoning as planning, while others focus on annotating for process supervision. Nevertheless, the planning-based search process often results in high latency due to the frequent assessment of intermediate reasoning states and the extensive exploration space. Additionally, supervising the reasoning process with human annotation is costly and challenging to scale for LLM training. To address these issues, in this paper, we propose a framework to learn planning-based reasoning through Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) on collected trajectories, which are ranked according to synthesized process rewards. Our results on challenging logical reasoning benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of our learning framework, showing that our 7B model can surpass the strong counterparts like GPT-3.5-Turbo.
Read more4/16/2024
0
Agent Q: Advanced Reasoning and Learning for Autonomous AI Agents
Pranav Putta, Edmund Mills, Naman Garg, Sumeet Motwani, Chelsea Finn, Divyansh Garg, Rafael Rafailov
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities in natural language tasks requiring complex reasoning, yet their application in agentic, multi-step reasoning within interactive environments remains a difficult challenge. Traditional supervised pre-training on static datasets falls short in enabling autonomous agent capabilities needed to perform complex decision-making in dynamic settings like web navigation. Previous attempts to bridge this ga-through supervised fine-tuning on curated expert demonstrations-often suffer from compounding errors and limited exploration data, resulting in sub-optimal policy outcomes. To overcome these challenges, we propose a framework that combines guided Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) search with a self-critique mechanism and iterative fine-tuning on agent interactions using an off-policy variant of the Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) algorithm. Our method allows LLM agents to learn effectively from both successful and unsuccessful trajectories, thereby improving their generalization in complex, multi-step reasoning tasks. We validate our approach in the WebShop environment-a simulated e-commerce platform where it consistently outperforms behavior cloning and reinforced fine-tuning baseline, and beats average human performance when equipped with the capability to do online search. In real-world booking scenarios, our methodology boosts Llama-3 70B model's zero-shot performance from 18.6% to 81.7% success rate (a 340% relative increase) after a single day of data collection and further to 95.4% with online search. We believe this represents a substantial leap forward in the capabilities of autonomous agents, paving the way for more sophisticated and reliable decision-making in real-world settings.
Read more8/15/2024