Cross-Language Assessment of Mathematical Capability of ChatGPT
0
š¤
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper evaluates the mathematical capabilities of the language model ChatGPT across several Indian languages, including Hindi, Gujarati, and Marathi.
- ChatGPT, based on GPT-3.5 from OpenAI, has gained significant attention for its natural language understanding and generation abilities.
- However, its performance in solving mathematical problems in multiple natural languages, especially regional Indian languages, remains largely unexplored.
- The paper aims to investigate ChatGPT's capabilities in this area and explore the use of chain-of-thought prompting to improve the accuracy of its responses.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at how well the AI chatbot ChatGPT can handle mathematical problems in different Indian languages, like Hindi, Gujarati, and Marathi. ChatGPT is an advanced language model that has impressed people with its ability to understand and generate natural language. But its skills at solving math problems in languages other than English haven't been studied much.
This research tries to fill that gap. The researchers tested ChatGPT's math abilities in these Indian languages and also tried a technique called "chain-of-thought prompting" to see if it could boost the accuracy of ChatGPT's responses, as it has been shown to do for English. This technique involves asking the AI to explain its reasoning step-by-step, which can help it arrive at more reliable answers.
The goal is to get a better understanding of ChatGPT's current limitations when it comes to mathematical reasoning in diverse languages, and to explore ways to potentially improve its performance in this area.
Technical Explanation
The researchers tested ChatGPT's ability to solve a variety of math problems, including arithmetic, algebra, geometry, and calculus, in Hindi, Gujarati, and Marathi. They compared its performance to that of human experts in these languages.
To assess the impact of chain-of-thought prompting, the researchers asked ChatGPT to not just provide the final answer, but to also explain its step-by-step reasoning. They then evaluated whether this approach increased the accuracy of ChatGPT's responses compared to simply asking for the final answer.
The paper provides insights into the current limitations of ChatGPT's mathematical reasoning capabilities in these regional Indian languages. It also explores the potential of chain-of-thought prompting as a technique to enhance the reliability of ChatGPT's responses, as has been shown to be effective in English and other languages.
Critical Analysis
The paper acknowledges that its scope is limited to only three Indian languages, and that further research is needed to assess ChatGPT's performance in a wider range of regional languages. The researchers also note that their study focuses on mathematical problem-solving, and that ChatGPT's capabilities may differ in other domains.
Additionally, the paper does not delve into the potential reasons for the observed limitations in ChatGPT's mathematical reasoning abilities across these languages. More investigation may be needed to understand the underlying factors, such as the training data, model architecture, or language-specific challenges.
While the paper provides valuable insights, it would be helpful to see the researchers explore the implications of their findings for the development of more robust and language-agnostic AI systems in the future.
Conclusion
This paper presents an important evaluation of the mathematical capabilities of ChatGPT, a widely-discussed language model, across three major Indian languages: Hindi, Gujarati, and Marathi. The findings suggest that while ChatGPT has impressive natural language abilities, its performance in solving math problems in these languages is still limited compared to human experts.
The researchers also explored the use of chain-of-thought prompting as a potential strategy to improve ChatGPT's mathematical reasoning, as has been shown effective for English and other languages. This study provides valuable insights into the current state of language models like ChatGPT and highlights the need for further research to develop AI systems that can truly excel at mathematical problem-solving in diverse linguistic contexts.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
š¤
0
Cross-Language Assessment of Mathematical Capability of ChatGPT
Gargi Sathe, Aneesh Shamraj, Aditya Surve, Nahush Patil, Kumkum Saxena
This paper presents an evaluation of the mathematical capability of ChatGPT across diverse languages like Hindi, Gujarati, and Marathi. ChatGPT, based on GPT-3.5 by OpenAI, has garnered significant attention for its natural language understanding and generation abilities. However, its performance in solving mathematical problems across multiple natural languages remains a comparatively unexplored area, especially in regional Indian languages. In this paper, we explore those capabilities as well as using chain-of-thought prompting to figure out if it increases the accuracy of responses as much as it does in the English language and provide insights into the current limitations.
Read more5/21/2024
š¬
0
The Qiyas Benchmark: Measuring ChatGPT Mathematical and Language Understanding in Arabic
Shahad Al-Khalifa, Hend Al-Khalifa
Despite the growing importance of Arabic as a global language, there is a notable lack of language models pre-trained exclusively on Arabic data. This shortage has led to limited benchmarks available for assessing language model performance in Arabic. To address this gap, we introduce two novel benchmarks designed to evaluate models' mathematical reasoning and language understanding abilities in Arabic. These benchmarks are derived from a General Aptitude Test (GAT) called Qiyas exam, a standardized test widely used for university admissions in Saudi Arabia. For validation purposes, we assess the performance of ChatGPT-3.5-trubo and ChatGPT-4 on our benchmarks. Our findings reveal that these benchmarks pose a significant challenge, with ChatGPT-4 achieving an overall average accuracy of 64%, while ChatGPT-3.5-trubo achieved an overall accuracy of 49% across the various question types in the Qiyas benchmark. We believe the release of these benchmarks will pave the way for enhancing the mathematical reasoning and language understanding capabilities of future models tailored for the low-resource Arabic language.
Read more7/2/2024
š
0
Unmasking the giant: A comprehensive evaluation of ChatGPT's proficiency in coding algorithms and data structures
Sayed Erfan Arefin, Tasnia Ashrafi Heya, Hasan Al-Qudah, Ynes Ineza, Abdul Serwadda
The transformative influence of Large Language Models (LLMs) is profoundly reshaping the Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology domain. Notably, ChatGPT distinguishes itself within these models, demonstrating remarkable performance in multi-turn conversations and exhibiting code proficiency across an array of languages. In this paper, we carry out a comprehensive evaluation of ChatGPT's coding capabilities based on what is to date the largest catalog of coding challenges. Our focus is on the python programming language and problems centered on data structures and algorithms, two topics at the very foundations of Computer Science. We evaluate ChatGPT for its ability to generate correct solutions to the problems fed to it, its code quality, and nature of run-time errors thrown by its code. Where ChatGPT code successfully executes, but fails to solve the problem at hand, we look into patterns in the test cases passed in order to gain some insights into how wrong ChatGPT code is in these kinds of situations. To infer whether ChatGPT might have directly memorized some of the data that was used to train it, we methodically design an experiment to investigate this phenomena. Making comparisons with human performance whenever feasible, we investigate all the above questions from the context of both its underlying learning models (GPT-3.5 and GPT-4), on a vast array sub-topics within the main topics, and on problems having varying degrees of difficulty.
Read more5/28/2024
š¬
0
Evaluating Telugu Proficiency in Large Language Models_ A Comparative Analysis of ChatGPT and Gemini
Katikela Sreeharsha Kishore, Rahimanuddin Shaik
The growing prominence of large language models (LLMs) necessitates the exploration of their capabilities beyond English. This research investigates the Telugu language proficiency of ChatGPT and Gemini, two leading LLMs. Through a designed set of 20 questions encompassing greetings, grammar, vocabulary, common phrases, task completion, and situational reasoning, the study delves into their strengths and weaknesses in handling Telugu. The analysis aims to identify the LLM that demonstrates a deeper understanding of Telugu grammatical structures, possesses a broader vocabulary, and exhibits superior performance in tasks like writing and reasoning. By comparing their ability to comprehend and use everyday Telugu expressions, the research sheds light on their suitability for real-world language interaction. Furthermore, the evaluation of adaptability and reasoning capabilities provides insights into how each LLM leverages Telugu to respond to dynamic situations. This comparative analysis contributes to the ongoing discussion on multilingual capabilities in AI and paves the way for future research in developing LLMs that can seamlessly integrate with Telugu-speaking communities.
Read more5/2/2024