The Qiyas Benchmark: Measuring ChatGPT Mathematical and Language Understanding in Arabic

Read original: arXiv:2407.00146 - Published 7/2/2024 by Shahad Al-Khalifa, Hend Al-Khalifa
Total Score

0

💬

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper introduces two novel benchmarks to evaluate language models' mathematical reasoning and language understanding in Arabic, a language with limited pre-trained models.
  • The benchmarks are derived from the Qiyas exam, a standardized test widely used for university admissions in Saudi Arabia.
  • The authors assess the performance of ChatGPT-3.5-trubo and ChatGPT-4 on these benchmarks, finding them to be a significant challenge.

Plain English Explanation

The paper discusses the growing importance of the Arabic language globally, but notes that there is a lack of language models trained specifically on Arabic data. This means there are limited ways to assess how well language models can understand and reason about the Arabic language.

To address this, the researchers created two new benchmarks, or sets of tests, that are designed to evaluate a language model's mathematical reasoning and language understanding abilities in Arabic. These benchmarks are based on a standardized test called the Qiyas exam, which is widely used for university admissions in Saudi Arabia.

The researchers then tested two versions of the ChatGPT language model, ChatGPT-3.5-trubo and ChatGPT-4, on these new benchmarks. They found that the benchmarks pose a significant challenge, with ChatGPT-4 achieving an average accuracy of 64% and ChatGPT-3.5-trubo achieving 49% across the different types of questions.

The researchers believe that the release of these new benchmarks will help drive the development of language models that are better able to understand and reason about the Arabic language, which is an important global language that has not received as much attention as some other languages in the field of natural language processing.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents two novel benchmarks designed to assess the mathematical reasoning and language understanding capabilities of language models in the Arabic language. These benchmarks are derived from the Qiyas exam, a standardized test used for university admissions in Saudi Arabia.

The researchers evaluate the performance of two versions of the ChatGPT language model, ChatGPT-3.5-trubo and ChatGPT-4, on these new benchmarks. The benchmarks cover a range of question types, including arithmetic, algebra, geometry, and language understanding tasks.

The results show that these benchmarks pose a significant challenge for the tested models. ChatGPT-4 achieved an overall average accuracy of 64%, while ChatGPT-3.5-trubo achieved an overall accuracy of 49% across the various question types.

The authors believe that the release of these benchmarks will contribute to the development of more capable language models for the Arabic language, which has been underrepresented in the field of natural language processing compared to other major languages.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes a valuable contribution by introducing benchmarks specifically designed to evaluate language models' capabilities in the Arabic language, which has received less attention than other major languages in the field of natural language processing.

However, the authors acknowledge that the benchmarks are derived from a single standardized test, the Qiyas exam, and may not capture the full breadth of language understanding and mathematical reasoning required in real-world Arabic language use. There may be opportunities to expand the benchmarks to include a wider range of tasks and test scenarios.

Additionally, the paper focuses solely on evaluating the performance of ChatGPT models, and it would be interesting to see how other large language models perform on these benchmarks. Comparing the results across a broader set of models could provide deeper insights into the state of the art in Arabic language understanding.

Overall, this research represents an important step in benchmarking the capabilities of language models for the Arabic language, and the released benchmarks can serve as a valuable resource for the research community.

Conclusion

This paper introduces two novel benchmarks designed to evaluate the mathematical reasoning and language understanding capabilities of language models in the Arabic language. The benchmarks are based on the Qiyas exam, a widely used standardized test in Saudi Arabia.

The authors' assessment of ChatGPT-3.5-trubo and ChatGPT-4 on these benchmarks reveals that they pose a significant challenge, with the more advanced ChatGPT-4 model achieving an average accuracy of 64% and the earlier ChatGPT-3.5-trubo model achieving 49%.

The release of these benchmarks is a significant contribution to the field of natural language processing for the Arabic language, which has historically been underrepresented. The benchmarks can serve as a valuable tool for driving the development of more capable language models tailored to the unique characteristics and requirements of the Arabic language.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

💬

Total Score

0

The Qiyas Benchmark: Measuring ChatGPT Mathematical and Language Understanding in Arabic

Shahad Al-Khalifa, Hend Al-Khalifa

Despite the growing importance of Arabic as a global language, there is a notable lack of language models pre-trained exclusively on Arabic data. This shortage has led to limited benchmarks available for assessing language model performance in Arabic. To address this gap, we introduce two novel benchmarks designed to evaluate models' mathematical reasoning and language understanding abilities in Arabic. These benchmarks are derived from a General Aptitude Test (GAT) called Qiyas exam, a standardized test widely used for university admissions in Saudi Arabia. For validation purposes, we assess the performance of ChatGPT-3.5-trubo and ChatGPT-4 on our benchmarks. Our findings reveal that these benchmarks pose a significant challenge, with ChatGPT-4 achieving an overall average accuracy of 64%, while ChatGPT-3.5-trubo achieved an overall accuracy of 49% across the various question types in the Qiyas benchmark. We believe the release of these benchmarks will pave the way for enhancing the mathematical reasoning and language understanding capabilities of future models tailored for the low-resource Arabic language.

Read more

7/2/2024

🤖

Total Score

0

Cross-Language Assessment of Mathematical Capability of ChatGPT

Gargi Sathe, Aneesh Shamraj, Aditya Surve, Nahush Patil, Kumkum Saxena

This paper presents an evaluation of the mathematical capability of ChatGPT across diverse languages like Hindi, Gujarati, and Marathi. ChatGPT, based on GPT-3.5 by OpenAI, has garnered significant attention for its natural language understanding and generation abilities. However, its performance in solving mathematical problems across multiple natural languages remains a comparatively unexplored area, especially in regional Indian languages. In this paper, we explore those capabilities as well as using chain-of-thought prompting to figure out if it increases the accuracy of responses as much as it does in the English language and provide insights into the current limitations.

Read more

5/21/2024

Benchmarking Large Language Models for Persian: A Preliminary Study Focusing on ChatGPT
Total Score

0

Benchmarking Large Language Models for Persian: A Preliminary Study Focusing on ChatGPT

Amirhossein Abaskohi, Sara Baruni, Mostafa Masoudi, Nesa Abbasi, Mohammad Hadi Babalou, Ali Edalat, Sepehr Kamahi, Samin Mahdizadeh Sani, Nikoo Naghavian, Danial Namazifard, Pouya Sadeghi, Yadollah Yaghoobzadeh

This paper explores the efficacy of large language models (LLMs) for Persian. While ChatGPT and consequent LLMs have shown remarkable performance in English, their efficiency for more low-resource languages remains an open question. We present the first comprehensive benchmarking study of LLMs across diverse Persian language tasks. Our primary focus is on GPT-3.5-turbo, but we also include GPT-4 and OpenChat-3.5 to provide a more holistic evaluation. Our assessment encompasses a diverse set of tasks categorized into classic, reasoning, and knowledge-based domains. To enable a thorough comparison, we evaluate LLMs against existing task-specific fine-tuned models. Given the limited availability of Persian datasets for reasoning tasks, we introduce two new benchmarks: one based on elementary school math questions and another derived from the entrance exams for 7th and 10th grades. Our findings reveal that while LLMs, especially GPT-4, excel in tasks requiring reasoning abilities and a broad understanding of general knowledge, they often lag behind smaller pre-trained models fine-tuned specifically for particular tasks. Additionally, we observe improved performance when test sets are translated to English before inputting them into GPT-3.5. These results highlight the significant potential for enhancing LLM performance in the Persian language. This is particularly noteworthy due to the unique attributes of Persian, including its distinct alphabet and writing styles.

Read more

4/4/2024

📊

Total Score

0

Unmasking the giant: A comprehensive evaluation of ChatGPT's proficiency in coding algorithms and data structures

Sayed Erfan Arefin, Tasnia Ashrafi Heya, Hasan Al-Qudah, Ynes Ineza, Abdul Serwadda

The transformative influence of Large Language Models (LLMs) is profoundly reshaping the Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology domain. Notably, ChatGPT distinguishes itself within these models, demonstrating remarkable performance in multi-turn conversations and exhibiting code proficiency across an array of languages. In this paper, we carry out a comprehensive evaluation of ChatGPT's coding capabilities based on what is to date the largest catalog of coding challenges. Our focus is on the python programming language and problems centered on data structures and algorithms, two topics at the very foundations of Computer Science. We evaluate ChatGPT for its ability to generate correct solutions to the problems fed to it, its code quality, and nature of run-time errors thrown by its code. Where ChatGPT code successfully executes, but fails to solve the problem at hand, we look into patterns in the test cases passed in order to gain some insights into how wrong ChatGPT code is in these kinds of situations. To infer whether ChatGPT might have directly memorized some of the data that was used to train it, we methodically design an experiment to investigate this phenomena. Making comparisons with human performance whenever feasible, we investigate all the above questions from the context of both its underlying learning models (GPT-3.5 and GPT-4), on a vast array sub-topics within the main topics, and on problems having varying degrees of difficulty.

Read more

5/28/2024