CRUXEval-X: A Benchmark for Multilingual Code Reasoning, Understanding and Execution
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- CruxEval-X is a new benchmark for evaluating the multilingual code reasoning, understanding, and execution capabilities of large language models.
- The benchmark covers a diverse range of programming languages, including English, Chinese, and others.
- It assesses models on tasks like code comprehension, code generation, and code execution.
- The benchmark aims to push the boundaries of what current language models can do with code in a multilingual setting.
Plain English Explanation
CruxEval-X: A Benchmark for Multilingual Code Reasoning, Understanding and Execution is a new way to test the abilities of AI language models when it comes to working with code in multiple languages.
The key idea is to create a set of tasks that challenge these models to not just understand code, but also generate and execute it correctly, all while handling different programming languages like English and Chinese. This is important because as AI becomes more advanced, we want to make sure it can handle real-world coding challenges, not just simple textual tasks.
The benchmark covers a diverse range of programming scenarios, testing things like the model's ability to comprehend code, generate new code to solve a problem, and actually run the code to produce the correct output. By testing across multiple languages, the benchmark aims to push the boundaries of what current language models are capable of when it comes to reasoning about and working with code.
Technical Explanation
CruxEval-X is a new benchmark designed to evaluate the multilingual code reasoning, understanding, and execution capabilities of large language models. The benchmark covers a diverse set of programming languages, including English and Chinese.
The benchmark construction process involves gathering a large corpus of code samples and associated natural language prompts across the target programming languages. These samples are then curated and annotated to create a diverse set of tasks that assess the model's ability to comprehend, generate, and execute code.
The benchmark includes three main task types:
- Code Comprehension: Evaluating the model's understanding of code through tasks like code summarization, code similarity detection, and code comment generation.
- Code Generation: Assessing the model's ability to generate correct and idiomatic code to solve a given problem.
- Code Execution: Testing the model's capability to execute code and produce the correct output.
By covering this range of tasks in a multilingual setting, CruxEval-X aims to provide a comprehensive evaluation of a model's code-related capabilities, going beyond traditional language understanding benchmarks.
Critical Analysis
The CruxEval-X benchmark represents an important step forward in evaluating the code-related capabilities of large language models. By testing across multiple programming languages, the benchmark helps identify strengths and weaknesses in a model's ability to reason about and work with code in real-world scenarios.
One potential limitation of the benchmark is the scope of the programming languages covered. While it includes English and Chinese, there are many other widely used programming languages that could be included to further broaden the evaluation. Additionally, the benchmark may not fully capture the nuances and complexities of real-world software development, which often involves more than just code understanding and generation.
Further research could explore ways to incorporate additional programming languages, as well as more realistic software development tasks, into the benchmark. This could help provide a more comprehensive assessment of a model's code-related capabilities and its suitability for practical applications.
Conclusion
CruxEval-X is an important new benchmark that aims to push the boundaries of what current language models can do with code in a multilingual setting. By evaluating a model's ability to comprehend, generate, and execute code across different programming languages, the benchmark provides a more comprehensive assessment of its code-related capabilities.
The development of this benchmark is a significant step forward in the field of AI and code understanding, as it highlights the growing importance of models that can effectively reason about and work with code in real-world applications. As language models continue to advance, benchmarks like CruxEval-X will be crucial for ensuring that these models can meet the demands of modern software development and other code-intensive tasks.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
CRUXEval-X: A Benchmark for Multilingual Code Reasoning, Understanding and Execution
Ruiyang Xu, Jialun Cao, Yaojie Lu, Hongyu Lin, Xianpei Han, Ben He, Shing-Chi Cheung, Le Sun
Code benchmarks such as HumanEval are widely adopted to evaluate Large Language Models' (LLMs) coding capabilities. However, there is an unignorable programming language bias in existing code benchmarks -- over 95% code generation benchmarks are dominated by Python, leaving the LLMs' capabilities in other programming languages such as Java and C/C++ unknown. Moreover, coding task bias is also crucial. Most benchmarks focus on code generation capability, while benchmarks for code reasoning (given input, reasoning output; and given output, reasoning input), an essential coding capability, are insufficient. Yet, constructing multi-lingual benchmarks can be expensive and labor-intensive, and codes in contest websites such as Leetcode suffer from data contamination during training. To fill this gap, we propose CRUXEVAL-X, a multi-lingual code reasoning benchmark that contains 19 programming languages. It comprises at least 600 subjects for each language, along with 19K content-consistent tests in total. In particular, the construction pipeline of CRUXEVAL-X works in a fully automated and test-guided manner, which iteratively generates and repairs based on execution feedback. Also, to cross language barriers (e.g., dynamic/static type systems in Python/C++), we formulated various transition rules between language pairs to facilitate translation. Our intensive evaluation of 24 representative LLMs reveals the correlation between language pairs. For example, TypeScript and JavaScript show a significant positive correlation, while Racket has less correlation with other languages. More interestingly, even a model trained solely on Python can achieve at most 34.4% Pass@1 in other languages, revealing the cross-language generalization of LLMs.
Read more8/26/2024
🤔
0
CodeScope: An Execution-based Multilingual Multitask Multidimensional Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on Code Understanding and Generation
Weixiang Yan, Haitian Liu, Yunkun Wang, Yunzhe Li, Qian Chen, Wen Wang, Tingyu Lin, Weishan Zhao, Li Zhu, Hari Sundaram, Shuiguang Deng
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance on assisting humans in programming and facilitating programming automation. However, existing benchmarks for evaluating the code understanding and generation capacities of LLMs suffer from severe limitations. First, most benchmarks are insufficient as they focus on a narrow range of popular programming languages and specific tasks, whereas real-world software development scenarios show a critical need to implement systems with multilingual and multitask programming environments to satisfy diverse requirements. Second, most benchmarks fail to consider the actual executability and the consistency of execution results of the generated code. To bridge these gaps between existing benchmarks and expectations from practical applications, we introduce CodeScope, an execution-based, multilingual, multitask, multidimensional evaluation benchmark for comprehensively measuring LLM capabilities on coding tasks. CodeScope covers 43 programming languages and eight coding tasks. It evaluates the coding performance of LLMs from three dimensions (perspectives): length, difficulty, and efficiency. To facilitate execution-based evaluations of code generation, we develop MultiCodeEngine, an automated code execution engine that supports 14 programming languages. Finally, we systematically evaluate and analyze eight mainstream LLMs and demonstrate the superior breadth and challenges of CodeScope for evaluating LLMs on code understanding and generation tasks compared to other benchmarks. The CodeScope benchmark and code are publicly available at https://github.com/WeixiangYAN/CodeScope.
Read more6/10/2024
0
Eliciting Better Multilingual Structured Reasoning from LLMs through Code
Bryan Li, Tamer Alkhouli, Daniele Bonadiman, Nikolaos Pappas, Saab Mansour
The development of large language models (LLM) has shown progress on reasoning, though studies have largely considered either English or simple reasoning tasks. To address this, we introduce a multilingual structured reasoning and explanation dataset, termed xSTREET, that covers four tasks across six languages. xSTREET exposes a gap in base LLM performance between English and non-English reasoning tasks. We then propose two methods to remedy this gap, building on the insight that LLMs trained on code are better reasoners. First, at training time, we augment a code dataset with multilingual comments using machine translation while keeping program code as-is. Second, at inference time, we bridge the gap between training and inference by employing a prompt structure that incorporates step-by-step code primitives to derive new facts and find a solution. Our methods show improved multilingual performance on xSTREET, most notably on the scientific commonsense reasoning subtask. Furthermore, the models show no regression on non-reasoning tasks, thus demonstrating our techniques maintain general-purpose abilities.
Read more6/13/2024
💬
0
CodeJudge-Eval: Can Large Language Models be Good Judges in Code Understanding?
Yuwei Zhao, Ziyang Luo, Yuchen Tian, Hongzhan Lin, Weixiang Yan, Annan Li, Jing Ma
Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have showcased impressive code generation capabilities, primarily evaluated through language-to-code benchmarks. However, these benchmarks may not fully capture a model's code understanding abilities. We introduce CodeJudge-Eval (CJ-Eval), a novel benchmark designed to assess LLMs' code understanding abilities from the perspective of code judging rather than code generation. CJ-Eval challenges models to determine the correctness of provided code solutions, encompassing various error types and compilation issues. By leveraging a diverse set of problems and a fine-grained judging system, CJ-Eval addresses the limitations of traditional benchmarks, including the potential memorization of solutions. Evaluation of 12 well-known LLMs on CJ-Eval reveals that even state-of-the-art models struggle, highlighting the benchmark's ability to probe deeper into models' code understanding abilities. Our codes and benchmark are available at url{https://github.com/CodeLLM-Research/CodeJudge-Eval}.
Read more9/16/2024