CUDRT: Benchmarking the Detection of Human vs. Large Language Models Generated Texts
2406.09056
0
0
Abstract
The proliferation of large language models (LLMs) has significantly enhanced text generation capabilities across various industries. However, these models' ability to generate human-like text poses substantial challenges in discerning between human and AI authorship. Despite the effectiveness of existing AI-generated text detectors, their development is hindered by the lack of comprehensive, publicly available benchmarks. Current benchmarks are limited to specific scenarios, such as question answering and text polishing, and predominantly focus on English texts, failing to capture the diverse applications and linguistic nuances of LLMs. To address these limitations, this paper constructs a comprehensive bilingual benchmark in both Chinese and English to evaluate mainstream AI-generated text detectors. We categorize LLM text generation into five distinct operations: Create, Update, Delete, Rewrite, and Translate (CUDRT), encompassing all current LLMs activities. We also establish a robust benchmark evaluation framework to support scalable and reproducible experiments. For each CUDRT category, we have developed extensive datasets to thoroughly assess detector performance. By employing the latest mainstream LLMs specific to each language, our datasets provide a thorough evaluation environment. Extensive experimental results offer critical insights for optimizing AI-generated text detectors and suggest future research directions to improve detection accuracy and generalizability across various scenarios.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper, titled "CUDRT: Benchmarking the Detection of Human vs. Large Language Models Generated Texts," explores the challenges of distinguishing between human-written and machine-generated text.
- The researchers present a new dataset, CUDRT, to benchmark the performance of various text detection models in identifying whether a given text was written by a human or generated by a large language model (LLM).
- The paper also provides a comparative analysis of different approaches to detecting machine-generated text, including MAGE, a survey of LLM-generated text detection, Beyond Turing, and a study on Vietnamese AI-generated text detection.
Plain English Explanation
The paper tackles the challenge of telling apart text written by humans and text generated by artificial intelligence, specifically large language models (LLMs). LLMs are a type of AI that can generate human-like text, which can be used for various applications but also raises concerns about the potential for deception.
To address this issue, the researchers created a new dataset called CUDRT, which contains a collection of texts written by both humans and LLMs. This dataset serves as a benchmark, allowing researchers and developers to test and compare different techniques for detecting whether a given text was written by a human or generated by an LLM.
The paper also reviews and compares various approaches to detecting machine-generated text, including the MAGE system, a survey of LLM-generated text detection methods, the Beyond Turing analysis, and a study on detecting AI-generated text in Vietnamese. By understanding the strengths and limitations of these different approaches, the researchers hope to help advance the field of machine-generated text detection, which has important implications for maintaining trust and transparency in digital communication.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a new dataset called CUDRT (Conditional Universal Dataset for Real-Time text detection) that is designed to benchmark the performance of models in distinguishing between human-written and LLM-generated texts. The dataset includes a variety of text samples from both human writers and large language models, covering different topics, styles, and lengths.
The researchers evaluate the performance of several state-of-the-art text detection approaches on the CUDRT dataset, including MAGE, a survey of LLM-generated text detection methods, the Beyond Turing analysis, and a study on detecting AI-generated text in Vietnamese. By comparing the performance of these different techniques, the paper provides insights into the strengths and limitations of each approach, as well as identifying areas for further research and development.
The key findings of the paper include the observation that existing text detection methods, while effective in certain scenarios, still struggle to accurately distinguish between human-written and LLM-generated texts, particularly when the LLM models are highly advanced. The paper also highlights the need for more comprehensive and diverse datasets to train and evaluate text detection models, as well as the importance of considering contextual factors and language-specific characteristics when designing detection algorithms.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a valuable contribution to the field of machine-generated text detection by introducing the CUDRT dataset and conducting a comparative analysis of various text detection approaches. However, the authors acknowledge several limitations and areas for further research.
One notable limitation is the potential for bias in the dataset, as the LLM-generated texts may not fully capture the diversity and complexity of real-world machine-generated content. Additionally, the paper does not explore the impact of different LLM architectures or fine-tuning techniques on the detection performance, which could be an important area for future investigation.
Furthermore, the paper does not delve into the ethical and societal implications of machine-generated text detection, such as the potential for abuse or the privacy concerns associated with analyzing user-generated content. Incorporating a more in-depth discussion of these broader issues could enhance the paper's contribution to the field.
Despite these limitations, the CUDRT dataset and the comparative analysis presented in the paper provide a valuable foundation for further research and development in the area of machine-generated text detection. As LLM technology continues to advance, the need for reliable and effective detection methods will only become more pressing, making this work an important step towards addressing this critical challenge.
Conclusion
This paper presents a new dataset, CUDRT, and a comparative analysis of various approaches to detecting whether a given text was written by a human or generated by a large language model (LLM). The researchers have made a valuable contribution to the field of machine-generated text detection, which is becoming increasingly important as LLM technology advances and the potential for deception and misuse of these systems grows.
The findings of the paper suggest that existing text detection methods still struggle to accurately distinguish between human-written and LLM-generated texts, particularly when the LLM models are highly advanced. The paper highlights the need for more comprehensive and diverse datasets, as well as the importance of considering contextual factors and language-specific characteristics when designing detection algorithms.
While the paper has some limitations, such as potential dataset bias and a lack of discussion on the broader ethical and societal implications, it provides a solid foundation for further research and development in this critical area. As the world grapples with the challenges posed by the rapid advancements in LLM technology, the insights and tools presented in this paper will be invaluable in maintaining trust and transparency in digital communication.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🔎
Deepfake Text Detection in the Wild
Yafu Li, Qintong Li, Leyang Cui, Wei Bi, Zhilin Wang, Longyue Wang, Linyi Yang, Shuming Shi, Yue Zhang
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) have achieved human-level text generation, emphasizing the need for effective AI-generated text detection to mitigate risks like the spread of fake news and plagiarism. Existing research has been constrained by evaluating detection methods on specific domains or particular language models. In practical scenarios, however, the detector faces texts from various domains or LLMs without knowing their sources. To this end, we build a comprehensive testbed by gathering texts from diverse human writings and texts generated by different LLMs. Empirical results show challenges in distinguishing machine-generated texts from human-authored ones across various scenarios, especially out-of-distribution. These challenges are due to the decreasing linguistic distinctions between the two sources. Despite challenges, the top-performing detector can identify 86.54% out-of-domain texts generated by a new LLM, indicating the feasibility for application scenarios. We release our resources at https://github.com/yafuly/MAGE.
5/22/2024
🔄
Benchmarking of LLM Detection: Comparing Two Competing Approaches
Thorsten Prohl, Erik Putzier, Rudiger Zarnekow
0
0
This article gives an overview of the field of LLM text recognition. Different approaches and implemented detectors for the recognition of LLM-generated text are presented. In addition to discussing the implementations, the article focuses on benchmarking the detectors. Although there are numerous software products for the recognition of LLM-generated text, with a focus on ChatGPT-like LLMs, the quality of the recognition (recognition rate) is not clear. Furthermore, while it can be seen that scientific contributions presenting their novel approaches strive for some kind of comparison with other approaches, the construction and independence of the evaluation dataset is often not comprehensible. As a result, discrepancies in the performance evaluation of LLM detectors are often visible due to the different benchmarking datasets. This article describes the creation of an evaluation dataset and uses this dataset to investigate the different detectors. The selected detectors are benchmarked against each other.
6/18/2024
🎲
A Survey on LLM-Generated Text Detection: Necessity, Methods, and Future Directions
Junchao Wu, Shu Yang, Runzhe Zhan, Yulin Yuan, Derek F. Wong, Lidia S. Chao
0
0
The powerful ability to understand, follow, and generate complex language emerging from large language models (LLMs) makes LLM-generated text flood many areas of our daily lives at an incredible speed and is widely accepted by humans. As LLMs continue to expand, there is an imperative need to develop detectors that can detect LLM-generated text. This is crucial to mitigate potential misuse of LLMs and safeguard realms like artistic expression and social networks from harmful influence of LLM-generated content. The LLM-generated text detection aims to discern if a piece of text was produced by an LLM, which is essentially a binary classification task. The detector techniques have witnessed notable advancements recently, propelled by innovations in watermarking techniques, statistics-based detectors, neural-base detectors, and human-assisted methods. In this survey, we collate recent research breakthroughs in this area and underscore the pressing need to bolster detector research. We also delve into prevalent datasets, elucidating their limitations and developmental requirements. Furthermore, we analyze various LLM-generated text detection paradigms, shedding light on challenges like out-of-distribution problems, potential attacks, real-world data issues and the lack of effective evaluation framework. Conclusively, we highlight interesting directions for future research in LLM-generated text detection to advance the implementation of responsible artificial intelligence (AI). Our aim with this survey is to provide a clear and comprehensive introduction for newcomers while also offering seasoned researchers a valuable update in the field of LLM-generated text detection. The useful resources are publicly available at: https://github.com/NLP2CT/LLM-generated-Text-Detection.
4/22/2024
M4GT-Bench: Evaluation Benchmark for Black-Box Machine-Generated Text Detection
Yuxia Wang, Jonibek Mansurov, Petar Ivanov, Jinyan Su, Artem Shelmanov, Akim Tsvigun, Osama Mohanned Afzal, Tarek Mahmoud, Giovanni Puccetti, Thomas Arnold, Alham Fikri Aji, Nizar Habash, Iryna Gurevych, Preslav Nakov
0
0
The advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) has brought an unprecedented surge in machine-generated text (MGT) across diverse channels. This raises legitimate concerns about its potential misuse and societal implications. The need to identify and differentiate such content from genuine human-generated text is critical in combating disinformation, preserving the integrity of education and scientific fields, and maintaining trust in communication. In this work, we address this problem by introducing a new benchmark based on a multilingual, multi-domain, and multi-generator corpus of MGTs -- M4GT-Bench. The benchmark is compiled of three tasks: (1) mono-lingual and multi-lingual binary MGT detection; (2) multi-way detection where one need to identify, which particular model generated the text; and (3) mixed human-machine text detection, where a word boundary delimiting MGT from human-written content should be determined. On the developed benchmark, we have tested several MGT detection baselines and also conducted an evaluation of human performance. We see that obtaining good performance in MGT detection usually requires an access to the training data from the same domain and generators. The benchmark is available at https://github.com/mbzuai-nlp/M4GT-Bench.
6/28/2024