Data Poisoning Attacks on Off-Policy Policy Evaluation Methods

Overview

• This paper examines the vulnerability of off-policy policy evaluation (OPE) methods to data poisoning attacks, where an adversary manipulates the training data to cause the OPE algorithm to produce biased estimates.
• The authors propose a framework called DOPE (Data Poisoning Attacks on Off-Policy Evaluation) to generate such attacks and evaluate their effectiveness on several OPE algorithms.
• The research highlights the importance of developing robust OPE methods that can withstand data poisoning attempts, which is crucial for reliable policy evaluation in real-world applications.

Plain English Explanation

Off-policy policy evaluation (OPE) is a technique used to estimate the performance of a new policy without actually implementing it. This is useful when you want to try out different policies, but don't want to risk deploying a policy that may perform poorly in the real world. OPE algorithms are designed to provide accurate estimates of a policy's performance based on historical data.

However, this paper shows that these OPE algorithms can be vulnerable to a type of attack called "data poisoning." In a data poisoning attack, an adversary manipulates the training data in a way that causes the OPE algorithm to produce biased, inaccurate estimates of the policy's performance. This could lead to the deployment of a suboptimal policy, with potentially serious consequences.

The authors propose a framework called DOPE (Data Poisoning Attacks on Off-Policy Evaluation) to generate these types of attacks and test their effectiveness on several OPE algorithms. This research highlights the importance of developing OPE methods that are robust to data poisoning attempts, so that policy evaluation can be conducted reliably in real-world applications.

Technical Explanation

The paper first provides the necessary preliminaries for understanding the OPE problem and the threat of data poisoning attacks. It then introduces the DOPE framework, which consists of three key components:

1. Attack Objective: The authors define the goal of the adversary as maximizing the bias in the OPE estimate, subject to a constraint on the level of perturbation to the training data.

2. Attack Generation: DOPE formulates the attack generation as an optimization problem, where the adversary seeks to find the optimal data perturbation that achieves the desired attack objective.

3. Attack Evaluation: The framework evaluates the effectiveness of the generated attacks by measuring the bias and variance of the OPE estimates on the perturbed data, and comparing them to the unperturbed case.

The paper presents experimental results on several benchmark OPE algorithms, including doubly robust estimators and kernel-based methods. The results demonstrate that the DOPE attacks can significantly degrade the performance of these OPE algorithms, highlighting the need for developing more robust methods.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the data poisoning threat against OPE methods, but there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:

1. The attack generation process assumes the adversary has complete knowledge of the OPE algorithm and access to the training data. In practice, the adversary may have more limited information, which could affect the feasibility and effectiveness of the attacks.

2. The paper focuses on untargeted attacks that aim to maximize the overall bias in the OPE estimate. Targeted attacks, where the adversary seeks to bias the estimate in a specific direction, could be an interesting avenue for future research.

3. The evaluation is limited to synthetic experiments, and it would be valuable to examine the real-world implications of these attacks on actual policy evaluation use cases.

4. While the paper proposes the DOPE framework, it does not provide solutions for making OPE methods more robust to data poisoning. Developing such defenses is an important next step in this line of research.

Overall, this paper makes a valuable contribution by highlighting the vulnerability of OPE methods to data poisoning attacks and providing a systematic framework for studying this threat. Further research in this area could lead to the development of more secure and reliable policy evaluation techniques.

Conclusion

This paper demonstrates that off-policy policy evaluation (OPE) methods can be vulnerable to data poisoning attacks, where an adversary manipulates the training data to cause the OPE algorithm to produce biased estimates of a policy's performance. The authors propose the DOPE framework to generate and evaluate such attacks, and their experiments show that several state-of-the-art OPE algorithms can be significantly degraded by these attacks.

The findings of this research underscore the importance of developing robust OPE methods that can withstand data poisoning attempts. Reliable policy evaluation is crucial for real-world applications, such as healthcare, education, and finance, where the deployment of suboptimal policies can have serious consequences. Advancing the security and reliability of OPE techniques is an important direction for future research in this field.