Decision-Focused Learning with Directional Gradients

Read original: arXiv:2402.03256 - Published 7/25/2024 by Michael Huang, Vishal Gupta

🎯

Overview

The researchers propose a new family of decision-aware surrogate losses called Perturbation Gradient (PG) losses.
The key idea is to connect the expected downstream decision loss with the directional derivative of a particular plug-in objective.
This derivative is then approximated using zeroth-order gradient techniques.
Unlike the original decision loss, the new PG losses can be optimized using standard gradient-based methods.
The approximation error of the PG losses vanishes as the number of samples grows, so optimizing the surrogate loss yields an asymptotically best-in-class policy, even in misspecified settings.

Plain English Explanation

The paper introduces a new way to optimize policies for decision-making problems. The typical approach is to define a "decision loss" that measures how good the policy is at making the right decisions. However, this decision loss is often tricky to optimize directly because it is discontinuous and changes sharply.

The researchers' key insight is to find a way to approximate this decision loss using a smooth, differentiable function. This new "surrogate loss" can then be optimized using standard gradient-based optimization techniques.

Importantly, the researchers show that as the number of samples used to estimate the surrogate loss increases, the approximation error goes to zero. This means that optimizing the surrogate loss will eventually find the best possible policy, even if the underlying model is misspecified (i.e., doesn't perfectly match reality). This is a significant result, as it means the method can work well even when the assumptions behind the model are not entirely accurate.

Technical Explanation

The core idea behind the Perturbation Gradient (PG) losses is to connect the expected downstream decision loss with the directional derivative of a particular plug-in objective. This derivative is then approximated using zeroth-order gradient techniques, which allows the surrogate loss to be optimized using standard gradient-based methods.

The researchers show that, unlike the original decision loss which is typically piecewise constant and discontinuous, the new PG losses can be optimized using off-the-shelf gradient-based methods. Most importantly, they prove that the approximation error of the PG losses vanishes as the number of samples grows. This means that optimizing the surrogate loss will asymptotically yield the best-in-class policy, even in misspecified settings.

The researchers provide numerical evidence confirming that their PG losses substantially outperform existing surrogate loss proposals when the underlying model is misspecified. This is the first such result in misspecified settings, and it represents a significant advance in the predict-then-optimize framework.

Critical Analysis

The researchers acknowledge that their PG losses rely on zeroth-order gradient approximations, which can be computationally intensive for high-dimensional problems. They suggest that future work could explore ways to reduce the sample complexity of these approximations or develop alternative surrogate losses that do not require gradient estimation.

Additionally, the paper focuses on a specific class of decision-making problems and does not address the broader applicability of the PG losses to other types of optimization problems. It would be valuable to see further research exploring the generalization of this approach to a wider range of scenarios.

Overall, the researchers have presented a promising new technique for optimizing decision-making policies, particularly in the face of model misspecification. The asymptotic guarantee of finding the best-in-class policy is a noteworthy contribution, and the numerical results suggest the PG losses can offer significant practical benefits. However, as with any new method, further research and validation will be needed to fully understand the strengths, limitations, and potential applications of this approach.

Conclusion

The proposed Perturbation Gradient (PG) losses represent a novel and potentially impactful contribution to the field of decision-aware optimization. By connecting the expected downstream decision loss to the directional derivative of a plug-in objective, the researchers have developed a surrogate loss that can be optimized using standard gradient-based techniques, even in the presence of model misspecification.

The key advantage of the PG losses is that their approximation error vanishes as the number of samples grows, ensuring that optimizing the surrogate loss will asymptotically yield the best-in-class policy. This is a significant result that could have far-reaching implications for a wide range of decision-making problems, from resource allocation to recommendation systems.

While the current implementation may face computational challenges for high-dimensional problems, the researchers have outlined potential avenues for future work to address these limitations. Overall, the PG losses represent an important step forward in the predict-then-optimize framework, with the potential to substantially improve the performance and robustness of decision-making systems.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🎯

Decision-Focused Learning with Directional Gradients

Michael Huang, Vishal Gupta

We propose a novel family of decision-aware surrogate losses, called Perturbation Gradient (PG) losses, for the predict-then-optimize framework. The key idea is to connect the expected downstream decision loss with the directional derivative of a particular plug-in objective, and then approximate this derivative using zeroth order gradient techniques. Unlike the original decision loss which is typically piecewise constant and discontinuous, our new PG losses can be optimized using off-the-shelf gradient-based methods. Most importantly, unlike existing surrogate losses, the approximation error of our PG losses vanishes as the number of samples grows. Hence, optimizing our surrogate loss yields a best-in-class policy asymptotically, even in misspecified settings. This is the first such result in misspecified settings, and we provide numerical evidence confirming our PG losses substantively outperform existing proposals when the underlying model is misspecified.

7/25/2024

Robust Losses for Decision-Focused Learning

Noah Schutte, Krzysztof Postek, Neil Yorke-Smith

Optimization models used to make discrete decisions often contain uncertain parameters that are context-dependent and estimated through prediction. To account for the quality of the decision made based on the prediction, decision-focused learning (end-to-end predict-then-optimize) aims at training the predictive model to minimize regret, i.e., the loss incurred by making a suboptimal decision. Despite the challenge of the gradient of this loss w.r.t. the predictive model parameters being zero almost everywhere for optimization problems with a linear objective, effective gradient-based learning approaches have been proposed to minimize the expected loss, using the empirical loss as a surrogate. However, empirical regret can be an ineffective surrogate because empirical optimal decisions can vary substantially from expected optimal decisions. To understand the impact of this deficiency, we evaluate the effect of aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty on the accuracy of empirical regret as a surrogate. Next, we propose three novel loss functions that approximate expected regret more robustly. Experimental results show that training two state-of-the-art decision-focused learning approaches using robust regret losses improves test-sample empirical regret in general while keeping computational time equivalent relative to the number of training epochs.

7/30/2024

Score Function Gradient Estimation to Widen the Applicability of Decision-Focused Learning

Mattia Silvestri, Senne Berden, Jayanta Mandi, Ali .Irfan Mahmutou{g}ullar{i}, Brandon Amos, Tias Guns, Michele Lombardi

Many real-world optimization problems contain parameters that are unknown before deployment time, either due to stochasticity or to lack of information (e.g., demand or travel times in delivery problems). A common strategy in such cases is to estimate said parameters via machine learning (ML) models trained to minimize the prediction error, which however is not necessarily aligned with the downstream task-level error. The decision-focused learning (DFL) paradigm overcomes this limitation by training to directly minimize a task loss, e.g. regret. Since the latter has non-informative gradients for combinatorial problems, state-of-the-art DFL methods introduce surrogates and approximations that enable training. But these methods exploit specific assumptions about the problem structures (e.g., convex or linear problems, unknown parameters only in the objective function). We propose an alternative method that makes no such assumptions, it combines stochastic smoothing with score function gradient estimation which works on any task loss. This opens up the use of DFL methods to nonlinear objectives, uncertain parameters in the problem constraints, and even two-stage stochastic optimization. Experiments show that it typically requires more epochs, but that it is on par with specialized methods and performs especially well for the difficult case of problems with uncertainty in the constraints, in terms of solution quality, scalability, or both.

6/18/2024

🎯

Zero Grads: Learning Local Surrogate Losses for Non-Differentiable Graphics

Michael Fischer, Tobias Ritschel

Gradient-based optimization is now ubiquitous across graphics, but unfortunately can not be applied to problems with undefined or zero gradients. To circumvent this issue, the loss function can be manually replaced by a ``surrogate'' that has similar minima but is differentiable. Our proposed framework, ZeroGrads, automates this process by learning a neural approximation of the objective function, which in turn can be used to differentiate through arbitrary black-box graphics pipelines. We train the surrogate on an actively smoothed version of the objective and encourage locality, focusing the surrogate's capacity on what matters at the current training episode. The fitting is performed online, alongside the parameter optimization, and self-supervised, without pre-computed data or pre-trained models. As sampling the objective is expensive (it requires a full rendering or simulator run), we devise an efficient sampling scheme that allows for tractable run-times and competitive performance at little overhead. We demonstrate optimizing diverse non-convex, non-differentiable black-box problems in graphics, such as visibility in rendering, discrete parameter spaces in procedural modelling or optimal control in physics-driven animation. In contrast to other derivative-free algorithms, our approach scales well to higher dimensions, which we demonstrate on problems with up to 35k interlinked variables.

5/8/2024