Learning Optimal Deterministic Policies with Stochastic Policy Gradients

2405.02235

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 5/31/2024 by Alessandro Montenegro, Marco Mussi, Alberto Maria Metelli, Matteo Papini

๐Ÿงช

Abstract

Policy gradient (PG) methods are successful approaches to deal with continuous reinforcement learning (RL) problems. They learn stochastic parametric (hyper)policies by either exploring in the space of actions or in the space of parameters. Stochastic controllers, however, are often undesirable from a practical perspective because of their lack of robustness, safety, and traceability. In common practice, stochastic (hyper)policies are learned only to deploy their deterministic version. In this paper, we make a step towards the theoretical understanding of this practice. After introducing a novel framework for modeling this scenario, we study the global convergence to the best deterministic policy, under (weak) gradient domination assumptions. Then, we illustrate how to tune the exploration level used for learning to optimize the trade-off between the sample complexity and the performance of the deployed deterministic policy. Finally, we quantitatively compare action-based and parameter-based exploration, giving a formal guise to intuitive results.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Policy gradient (PG) methods are successful for continuous reinforcement learning (RL) problems.
  • They learn stochastic parametric (hyper)policies by exploring in the action or parameter space.
  • Stochastic controllers can be impractical due to lack of robustness, safety, and traceability.
  • In practice, stochastic (hyper)policies are often learned to deploy their deterministic versions.

Plain English Explanation

Policy gradient (PG) methods are a successful approach to solving continuous reinforcement learning (RL) problems. These methods learn stochastic, or random, policies by exploring either the space of possible actions or the space of policy parameters. This means the agent doesn't always take the same actions, but instead selects actions based on a probability distribution.

While stochastic policies can be effective during the learning process, they can be problematic in practical applications. Stochastic controllers tend to lack robustness, safety, and the ability to trace or understand their decision-making. As a result, in real-world use cases, the stochastic policies learned during training are often converted to deterministic versions that always take the same actions.

This paper aims to provide a theoretical understanding of this common practice of converting stochastic policies to deterministic ones. The researchers introduce a framework for modeling this scenario and study when the learned deterministic policy will converge to the best possible deterministic policy. They also explore how to balance the exploration level used during training to optimize the tradeoff between sample complexity (how much data is needed) and the performance of the final deterministic policy.

Additionally, the paper compares two different exploration approaches - exploring in the action space versus exploring in the parameter space of the policy. This provides a formal analysis of some intuitive results about the differences between these two exploration methods.

Technical Explanation

This paper introduces a novel framework for modeling the scenario where stochastic parametric (hyper)policies are learned, but only their deterministic versions are deployed in practice. Under gradient domination assumptions, the researchers study the global convergence to the best deterministic policy.

The paper then illustrates how to tune the exploration level used for learning in order to optimize the tradeoff between sample complexity and the performance of the deployed deterministic policy. This builds on prior work in extremum seeking and stochastic online optimization.

Finally, the authors provide a formal comparison of action-based and parameter-based exploration, giving a rigorous treatment to some intuitive results about the differences between these two exploration approaches used in trajectory-oriented policy optimization for sparse reward settings.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes a valuable contribution by providing a theoretical framework for understanding the common practice of learning stochastic policies but deploying deterministic ones. The analysis of the convergence properties and the exploration-exploitation tradeoff offers useful insights.

However, the paper does rely on some strong assumptions, such as gradient domination, which may not hold in all practical scenarios. Additionally, the formal comparison of action-based and parameter-based exploration, while interesting, may have limited real-world applicability, as the choice of exploration method often depends heavily on the specific problem and domain.

Further research could explore relaxing some of the assumptions, considering alternative exploration strategies, or investigating the implications of this framework in various RL application domains. It would also be helpful to see empirical validation of the theoretical results presented here.

Conclusion

This paper takes an important step towards a deeper theoretical understanding of a common practice in reinforcement learning - learning stochastic policies but deploying deterministic ones. By introducing a novel framework, analyzing convergence properties, and comparing exploration approaches, the authors provide useful insights that can inform the design of more robust and effective RL systems. While the results rely on some strong assumptions, this work lays the groundwork for further advancements in this area of research.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

๐Ÿ…

Towards Principled, Practical Policy Gradient for Bandits and Tabular MDPs

Michael Lu, Matin Aghaei, Anant Raj, Sharan Vaswani

YC

0

Reddit

0

We consider (stochastic) softmax policy gradient (PG) methods for bandits and tabular Markov decision processes (MDPs). While the PG objective is non-concave, recent research has used the objective's smoothness and gradient domination properties to achieve convergence to an optimal policy. However, these theoretical results require setting the algorithm parameters according to unknown problem-dependent quantities (e.g. the optimal action or the true reward vector in a bandit problem). To address this issue, we borrow ideas from the optimization literature to design practical, principled PG methods in both the exact and stochastic settings. In the exact setting, we employ an Armijo line-search to set the step-size for softmax PG and empirically demonstrate a linear convergence rate. In the stochastic setting, we utilize exponentially decreasing step-sizes, and characterize the convergence rate of the resulting algorithm. We show that the proposed algorithm offers similar theoretical guarantees as the state-of-the art results, but does not require the knowledge of oracle-like quantities. For the multi-armed bandit setting, our techniques result in a theoretically-principled PG algorithm that does not require explicit exploration, the knowledge of the reward gap, the reward distributions, or the noise. Finally, we empirically compare the proposed methods to PG approaches that require oracle knowledge, and demonstrate competitive performance.

Read more

5/24/2024

โž–

Beyond Stationarity: Convergence Analysis of Stochastic Softmax Policy Gradient Methods

Sara Klein, Simon Weissmann, Leif Doring

YC

0

Reddit

0

Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) are a formal framework for modeling and solving sequential decision-making problems. In finite-time horizons such problems are relevant for instance for optimal stopping or specific supply chain problems, but also in the training of large language models. In contrast to infinite horizon MDPs optimal policies are not stationary, policies must be learned for every single epoch. In practice all parameters are often trained simultaneously, ignoring the inherent structure suggested by dynamic programming. This paper introduces a combination of dynamic programming and policy gradient called dynamic policy gradient, where the parameters are trained backwards in time. For the tabular softmax parametrisation we carry out the convergence analysis for simultaneous and dynamic policy gradient towards global optima, both in the exact and sampled gradient settings without regularisation. It turns out that the use of dynamic policy gradient training much better exploits the structure of finite- time problems which is reflected in improved convergence bounds.

Read more

5/7/2024

๐Ÿ”Ž

Matrix Low-Rank Approximation For Policy Gradient Methods

Sergio Rozada, Antonio G. Marques

YC

0

Reddit

0

Estimating a policy that maps states to actions is a central problem in reinforcement learning. Traditionally, policies are inferred from the so called value functions (VFs), but exact VF computation suffers from the curse of dimensionality. Policy gradient (PG) methods bypass this by learning directly a parametric stochastic policy. Typically, the parameters of the policy are estimated using neural networks (NNs) tuned via stochastic gradient descent. However, finding adequate NN architectures can be challenging, and convergence issues are common as well. In this paper, we put forth low-rank matrix-based models to estimate efficiently the parameters of PG algorithms. We collect the parameters of the stochastic policy into a matrix, and then, we leverage matrix-completion techniques to promote (enforce) low rank. We demonstrate via numerical studies how low-rank matrix-based policy models reduce the computational and sample complexities relative to NN models, while achieving a similar aggregated reward.

Read more

5/29/2024

Mollification Effects of Policy Gradient Methods

Mollification Effects of Policy Gradient Methods

Tao Wang, Sylvia Herbert, Sicun Gao

YC

0

Reddit

0

Policy gradient methods have enabled deep reinforcement learning (RL) to approach challenging continuous control problems, even when the underlying systems involve highly nonlinear dynamics that generate complex non-smooth optimization landscapes. We develop a rigorous framework for understanding how policy gradient methods mollify non-smooth optimization landscapes to enable effective policy search, as well as the downside of it: while making the objective function smoother and easier to optimize, the stochastic objective deviates further from the original problem. We demonstrate the equivalence between policy gradient methods and solving backward heat equations. Following the ill-posedness of backward heat equations from PDE theory, we present a fundamental challenge to the use of policy gradient under stochasticity. Moreover, we make the connection between this limitation and the uncertainty principle in harmonic analysis to understand the effects of exploration with stochastic policies in RL. We also provide experimental results to illustrate both the positive and negative aspects of mollification effects in practice.

Read more

5/29/2024