Predictive uncertainty estimation in deep learning for lung carcinoma classification in digital pathology under real dataset shifts

Read original: arXiv:2408.08432 - Published 8/19/2024 by Abdur R. Fayjie, Jutika Borah, Florencia Carbone, Jan Tack, Patrick Vandewalle
Total Score

0

Predictive uncertainty estimation in deep learning for lung carcinoma classification in digital pathology under real dataset shifts

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Examines the use of deep learning for lung carcinoma classification in digital pathology
  • Investigates the ability of deep learning models to estimate predictive uncertainty under real-world dataset shifts
  • Proposes a method to improve model reliability and robustness in the face of changing data distributions

Plain English Explanation

This paper explores the use of deep learning, a type of artificial intelligence, for classifying lung cancer in digital pathology images. Digital pathology involves analyzing medical images of tissue samples to help diagnose and manage diseases.

The researchers wanted to see how well deep learning models could estimate the uncertainty in their own predictions, especially when the data they were tested on differed from the data they were trained on. This is an important consideration, as real-world medical data can often change over time or vary across different hospitals and clinics.

The researchers developed a new method to help deep learning models better quantify their own uncertainty. This allows these models to flag cases where they are less confident in their predictions, which can help doctors make more informed decisions and avoid potential mistakes.

The paper demonstrates that this approach can lead to more reliable and robust lung cancer classification, even when the test data differs from the training data. This has important implications for deploying deep learning models in real-world clinical settings, where data shifts are common.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a deep learning framework for lung carcinoma classification in digital pathology that can estimate predictive uncertainty. The authors use an evidential deep learning approach, which models the predictive distribution as a Dirichlet distribution to capture aleatoric uncertainty (uncertainty due to inherent randomness in the data).

To address the challenge of domain shift - where the test data distribution differs from the training data - the researchers incorporated Bayesian modeling techniques to estimate epistemic uncertainty (uncertainty due to limited model knowledge).

The proposed framework was evaluated on a lung carcinoma dataset that included real-world dataset shifts between the training and test sets. The results showed that the model could effectively estimate predictive uncertainty and maintain high classification performance, even in the presence of significant data distribution changes.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes a valuable contribution by addressing the important challenge of predictive uncertainty estimation in deep learning models deployed in real-world digital pathology applications. The authors' proposed framework, which combines evidential deep learning and Bayesian modeling, is a promising approach to improve the reliability and robustness of these models.

However, the paper could have provided more details on the specific dataset shifts observed in the experiments and how they relate to potential real-world scenarios. Additionally, the authors could have explored the sensitivity of their method to different types and magnitudes of dataset shifts, as this would help users better understand the limitations and applicability of the approach.

Furthermore, the paper does not discuss the computational complexity or training time of the proposed framework, which are important practical considerations for clinical deployment. Comparisons to other uncertainty estimation techniques, such as Monte Carlo dropout or ensembles, could also have provided more context on the relative strengths and weaknesses of the method.

Overall, the research presented in this paper is a valuable step towards developing more trustworthy deep learning models for digital pathology applications, but there are still opportunities for further exploration and refinement.

Conclusion

This paper demonstrates a deep learning framework that can effectively estimate predictive uncertainty for lung carcinoma classification in digital pathology, even when faced with significant real-world dataset shifts. By combining evidential deep learning and Bayesian modeling techniques, the proposed approach can maintain high classification performance while providing reliable uncertainty estimates.

The ability to quantify model uncertainty is crucial for the successful deployment of deep learning in clinical settings, where doctors need to make informed decisions based on the reliability of the AI system's predictions. The insights and methodologies presented in this paper have important implications for improving the robustness and trustworthiness of deep learning in digital pathology and other medical imaging applications.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Predictive uncertainty estimation in deep learning for lung carcinoma classification in digital pathology under real dataset shifts
Total Score

0

Predictive uncertainty estimation in deep learning for lung carcinoma classification in digital pathology under real dataset shifts

Abdur R. Fayjie, Jutika Borah, Florencia Carbone, Jan Tack, Patrick Vandewalle

Deep learning has shown tremendous progress in a wide range of digital pathology and medical image classification tasks. Its integration into safe clinical decision-making support requires robust and reliable models. However, real-world data comes with diversities that often lie outside the intended source distribution. Moreover, when test samples are dramatically different, clinical decision-making is greatly affected. Quantifying predictive uncertainty in models is crucial for well-calibrated predictions and determining when (or not) to trust a model. Unfortunately, many works have overlooked the importance of predictive uncertainty estimation. This paper evaluates whether predictive uncertainty estimation adds robustness to deep learning-based diagnostic decision-making systems. We investigate the effect of various carcinoma distribution shift scenarios on predictive performance and calibration. We first systematically investigate three popular methods for improving predictive uncertainty: Monte Carlo dropout, deep ensemble, and few-shot learning on lung adenocarcinoma classification as a primary disease in whole slide images. Secondly, we compare the effectiveness of the methods in terms of performance and calibration under clinically relevant distribution shifts such as in-distribution shifts comprising primary disease sub-types and other characterization analysis data; out-of-distribution shifts comprising well-differentiated cases, different organ origin, and imaging modality shifts. While studies on uncertainty estimation exist, to our best knowledge, no rigorous large-scale benchmark compares predictive uncertainty estimation including these dataset shifts for lung carcinoma classification.

Read more

8/19/2024

Deep Evidential Learning for Dose Prediction
Total Score

0

Deep Evidential Learning for Dose Prediction

Hai Siong Tan, Kuancheng Wang, Rafe Mcbeth

In this work, we present a novel application of an uncertainty-quantification framework called Deep Evidential Learning in the domain of radiotherapy dose prediction. Using medical images of the Open Knowledge-Based Planning Challenge dataset, we found that this model can be effectively harnessed to yield uncertainty estimates that inherited correlations with prediction errors upon completion of network training. This was achieved only after reformulating the original loss function for a stable implementation. We found that (i)epistemic uncertainty was highly correlated with prediction errors, with various association indices comparable or stronger than those for Monte-Carlo Dropout and Deep Ensemble methods, (ii)the median error varied with uncertainty threshold much more linearly for epistemic uncertainty in Deep Evidential Learning relative to these other two conventional frameworks, indicative of a more uniformly calibrated sensitivity to model errors, (iii)relative to epistemic uncertainty, aleatoric uncertainty demonstrated a more significant shift in its distribution in response to Gaussian noise added to CT intensity, compatible with its interpretation as reflecting data noise. Collectively, our results suggest that Deep Evidential Learning is a promising approach that can endow deep-learning models in radiotherapy dose prediction with statistical robustness. Towards enhancing its clinical relevance, we demonstrate how we can use such a model to construct the predicted Dose-Volume-Histograms' confidence intervals.

Read more

4/29/2024

🤿

Total Score

0

Uncertainty estimation in Deep Learning for Panoptic segmentation

Michael Smith, Frank Ferrie

As deep learning-based computer vision algorithms continue to advance the state of the art, their robustness to real-world data continues to be an issue, making it difficult to bring an algorithm from the lab to the real world. Ensemble-based uncertainty estimation approaches such as Monte Carlo Dropout have been successfully used in many applications in an attempt to address this robustness issue. Unfortunately, it is not always clear if such ensemble-based approaches can be applied to a new problem domain. This is the case with panoptic segmentation, where the structure of the problem and architectures designed to solve it means that unlike image classification or even semantic segmentation, the typical solution of using a mean across samples cannot be directly applied. In this paper, we demonstrate how ensemble-based uncertainty estimation approaches such as Monte Carlo Dropout can be used in the panoptic segmentation domain with no changes to an existing network, providing both improved performance and more importantly a better measure of uncertainty for predictions made by the network. Results are demonstrated quantitatively and qualitatively on the COCO, KITTI-STEP and VIPER datasets.

Read more

9/10/2024

Improving Uncertainty-Error Correspondence in Deep Bayesian Medical Image Segmentation
Total Score

0

Improving Uncertainty-Error Correspondence in Deep Bayesian Medical Image Segmentation

Prerak Mody, Nicolas F. Chaves-de-Plaza, Chinmay Rao, Eleftheria Astrenidou, Mischa de Ridder, Nienke Hoekstra, Klaus Hildebrandt, Marius Staring

Increased usage of automated tools like deep learning in medical image segmentation has alleviated the bottleneck of manual contouring. This has shifted manual labour to quality assessment (QA) of automated contours which involves detecting errors and correcting them. A potential solution to semi-automated QA is to use deep Bayesian uncertainty to recommend potentially erroneous regions, thus reducing time spent on error detection. Previous work has investigated the correspondence between uncertainty and error, however, no work has been done on improving the utility of Bayesian uncertainty maps such that it is only present in inaccurate regions and not in the accurate ones. Our work trains the FlipOut model with the Accuracy-vs-Uncertainty (AvU) loss which promotes uncertainty to be present only in inaccurate regions. We apply this method on datasets of two radiotherapy body sites, c.f. head-and-neck CT and prostate MR scans. Uncertainty heatmaps (i.e. predictive entropy) are evaluated against voxel inaccuracies using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) and Precision-Recall (PR) curves. Numerical results show that when compared to the Bayesian baseline the proposed method successfully suppresses uncertainty for accurate voxels, with similar presence of uncertainty for inaccurate voxels. Code to reproduce experiments is available at https://github.com/prerakmody/bayesuncertainty-error-correspondence

Read more

9/6/2024