Deep Learning Segmentation of Ascites on Abdominal CT Scans for Automatic Volume Quantification

Read original: arXiv:2406.15979 - Published 6/26/2024 by Benjamin Hou, Sung-Won Lee, Jung-Min Lee, Christopher Koh, Jing Xiao, Perry J. Pickhardt, Ronald M. Summers
Total Score

0

🤿

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This study evaluates the performance of a deep learning model in detecting and quantifying the volume of ascites (fluid buildup) in patients with liver cirrhosis and ovarian cancer.
  • The model was trained on data from The Cancer Genome Atlas Ovarian Cancer dataset and tested on internal and external datasets from two medical institutions.
  • The study measures the model's performance using metrics like Dice coefficient and volume estimation error, and compares its results to expert radiologist assessments.

Plain English Explanation

The researchers developed a deep learning machine learning technique that uses artificial neural networks to automatically identify and measure the amount of ascites (fluid buildup) in the abdominal area of patients with liver cirrhosis and ovarian cancer. Ascites can be a serious complication of these conditions, so being able to accurately detect and measure it is important for patient care.

The model was trained on a dataset of CT scans from ovarian cancer patients. It was then tested on two sets of CT scans from patients at the National Institutes of Health (one with liver cirrhosis, one with ovarian cancer) and one set from the University of Wisconsin (also with liver cirrhosis). The researchers compared the model's ascites segmentation and volume measurements to evaluations made by expert radiologists.

Overall, the deep learning model performed well, achieving Dice scores [a metric for evaluating image segmentation] around 0.8-0.9 and median volume estimation errors under 20% across the different datasets. This indicates the model was able to accurately identify and quantify the ascites, aligning closely with the radiologists' assessments. The researchers conclude this automated approach could be a useful tool to support clinicians in managing ascites in these patient populations.

Technical Explanation

This retrospective study evaluated the performance of a deep learning model in detecting ascites and quantifying its volume in patients with liver cirrhosis and ovarian cancer. The model was trained on the The Cancer Genome Atlas Ovarian Cancer dataset and tested on two internal (NIH-LC and NIH-OV) and one external (UofW-LC) dataset.

On the NIH-LC dataset of 25 cirrhosis patients, the model achieved a Dice score of 0.855 ± 0.061 and median volume estimation error of 19.6%. For the 166 ovarian cancer patients in the NIH-OV dataset, the Dice score was 0.826 ± 0.153 with a 5.3% median volume error. On the external UofW-LC dataset of 124 cirrhosis patients, the model had a Dice score of 0.830 ± 0.107 and 9.7% median volume error.

Across all test sets, the model showed strong agreement with expert radiologist assessments, with R^2 values of 0.79, 0.98, and 0.97. This indicates the deep learning method was able to effectively segment and quantify ascites volume in concordance with human experts.

Critical Analysis

The study provides a thorough evaluation of the deep learning model's performance on both internal and external datasets, which increases confidence in the generalizability of the results. The use of Dice coefficient, volume estimation error, and comparison to radiologist assessments offers a comprehensive set of metrics to assess the model's effectiveness.

However, the paper does not provide details on the model architecture or training process, limiting the ability to fully critique the technical implementation. Additionally, while the model performed well overall, the confidence intervals and standard deviations show there is still room for improvement, especially on the ovarian cancer dataset.

Further research could explore ways to enhance the model's segmentation and quantification accuracy, perhaps by incorporating additional data modalities or architectural innovations like those seen in abdominal organ segmentation and tumor segmentation studies. Evaluating the model's clinical impact and workflow integration would also be valuable next steps.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates the potential of deep learning to assist clinicians in the detection and quantification of ascites in patients with liver cirrhosis and ovarian cancer. The model achieved strong performance compared to expert radiologist assessments, suggesting it could be a useful tool to support the management of these conditions. Further research to refine the model and assess its real-world clinical application would help unlock the full benefits of this automated approach.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🤿

Total Score

0

Deep Learning Segmentation of Ascites on Abdominal CT Scans for Automatic Volume Quantification

Benjamin Hou, Sung-Won Lee, Jung-Min Lee, Christopher Koh, Jing Xiao, Perry J. Pickhardt, Ronald M. Summers

Purpose: To evaluate the performance of an automated deep learning method in detecting ascites and subsequently quantifying its volume in patients with liver cirrhosis and ovarian cancer. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included contrast-enhanced and non-contrast abdominal-pelvic CT scans of patients with cirrhotic ascites and patients with ovarian cancer from two institutions, National Institutes of Health (NIH) and University of Wisconsin (UofW). The model, trained on The Cancer Genome Atlas Ovarian Cancer dataset (mean age, 60 years +/- 11 [s.d.]; 143 female), was tested on two internal (NIH-LC and NIH-OV) and one external dataset (UofW-LC). Its performance was measured by the Dice coefficient, standard deviations, and 95% confidence intervals, focusing on ascites volume in the peritoneal cavity. Results: On NIH-LC (25 patients; mean age, 59 years +/- 14 [s.d.]; 14 male) and NIH-OV (166 patients; mean age, 65 years +/- 9 [s.d.]; all female), the model achieved Dice scores of 0.855 +/- 0.061 (CI: 0.831-0.878) and 0.826 +/- 0.153 (CI: 0.764-0.887), with median volume estimation errors of 19.6% (IQR: 13.2-29.0) and 5.3% (IQR: 2.4-9.7) respectively. On UofW-LC (124 patients; mean age, 46 years +/- 12 [s.d.]; 73 female), the model had a Dice score of 0.830 +/- 0.107 (CI: 0.798-0.863) and median volume estimation error of 9.7% (IQR: 4.5-15.1). The model showed strong agreement with expert assessments, with r^2 values of 0.79, 0.98, and 0.97 across the test sets. Conclusion: The proposed deep learning method performed well in segmenting and quantifying the volume of ascites in concordance with expert radiologist assessments.

Read more

6/26/2024

🧠

Total Score

0

Automatic Segmentation of the Kidneys and Cystic Renal Lesions on Non-Contrast CT Using a Convolutional Neural Network

Lucas Aronson (Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health, Madison, WI, USA), Ruben Ngnitewe Massaa (Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health, Madison, WI, USA), Syed Jamal Safdar Gardezi (Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health, Madison, WI, USA), Andrew L. Wentland (Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health, Madison, WI, USA, Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health, Madison, WI, USA, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health, Madison, WI, USA)

Objective: Automated segmentation tools are useful for calculating kidney volumes rapidly and accurately. Furthermore, these tools have the power to facilitate large-scale image-based artificial intelligence projects by generating input labels, such as for image registration algorithms. Prior automated segmentation models have largely ignored non-contrast computed tomography (CT) imaging. This work aims to implement and train a deep learning (DL) model to segment the kidneys and cystic renal lesions (CRLs) from non-contrast CT scans. Methods: Manual segmentation of the kidneys and CRLs was performed on 150 non-contrast abdominal CT scans. The data were divided into an 80/20 train/test split and a deep learning (DL) model was trained to segment the kidneys and CRLs. Various scoring metrics were used to assess model performance, including the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), Jaccard Index (JI), and absolute and percent error kidney volume and lesion volume. Bland-Altman (B-A) analysis was performed to compare manual versus DL-based kidney volumes. Results: The DL model achieved a median kidney DSC of 0.934, median CRL DSC of 0.711, and total median study DSC of 0.823. Average volume errors were 0.9% for renal parenchyma, 37.0% for CRLs, and 2.2% overall. B-A analysis demonstrated that DL-based volumes tended to be greater than manual volumes, with a mean bias of +3.0 ml (+/- 2 SD of +/- 50.2 ml). Conclusion: A deep learning model trained to segment kidneys and cystic renal lesions on non-contrast CT examinations was able to provide highly accurate segmentations, with a median kidney Dice Similarity Coefficient of 0.934. Keywords: deep learning; kidney segmentation; artificial intelligence; convolutional neural networks.

Read more

5/15/2024

Automatic Organ and Pan-cancer Segmentation in Abdomen CT: the FLARE 2023 Challenge
Total Score

0

Automatic Organ and Pan-cancer Segmentation in Abdomen CT: the FLARE 2023 Challenge

Jun Ma, Yao Zhang, Song Gu, Cheng Ge, Ershuai Wang, Qin Zhou, Ziyan Huang, Pengju Lyu, Jian He, Bo Wang

Organ and cancer segmentation in abdomen Computed Tomography (CT) scans is the prerequisite for precise cancer diagnosis and treatment. Most existing benchmarks and algorithms are tailored to specific cancer types, limiting their ability to provide comprehensive cancer analysis. This work presents the first international competition on abdominal organ and pan-cancer segmentation by providing a large-scale and diverse dataset, including 4650 CT scans with various cancer types from over 40 medical centers. The winning team established a new state-of-the-art with a deep learning-based cascaded framework, achieving average Dice Similarity Coefficient scores of 92.3% for organs and 64.9% for lesions on the hidden multi-national testing set. The dataset and code of top teams are publicly available, offering a benchmark platform to drive further innovations https://codalab.lisn.upsaclay.fr/competitions/12239.

Read more

8/23/2024

LiverUSRecon: Automatic 3D Reconstruction and Volumetry of the Liver with a Few Partial Ultrasound Scans
Total Score

0

LiverUSRecon: Automatic 3D Reconstruction and Volumetry of the Liver with a Few Partial Ultrasound Scans

Kaushalya Sivayogaraj, Sahan T. Guruge, Udari Liyanage, Jeevani Udupihille, Saroj Jayasinghe, Gerard Fernando, Ranga Rodrigo, M. Rukshani Liyanaarachchi

3D reconstruction of the liver for volumetry is important for qualitative analysis and disease diagnosis. Liver volumetry using ultrasound (US) scans, although advantageous due to less acquisition time and safety, is challenging due to the inherent noisiness in US scans, blurry boundaries, and partial liver visibility. We address these challenges by using the segmentation masks of a few incomplete sagittal-plane US scans of the liver in conjunction with a statistical shape model (SSM) built using a set of CT scans of the liver. We compute the shape parameters needed to warp this canonical SSM to fit the US scans through a parametric regression network. The resulting 3D liver reconstruction is accurate and leads to automatic liver volume calculation. We evaluate the accuracy of the estimated liver volumes with respect to CT segmentation volumes using RMSE. Our volume computation is statistically much closer to the volume estimated using CT scans than the volume computed using Childs' method by radiologists: p-value of 0.094 (>0.05) says that there is no significant difference between CT segmentation volumes and ours in contrast to Childs' method. We validate our method using investigations (ablation studies) on the US image resolution, the number of CT scans used for SSM, the number of principal components, and the number of input US scans. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first automatic liver volumetry system using a few incomplete US scans given a set of CT scans of livers for SSM.

Read more

7/1/2024