Deep Optimal Experimental Design for Parameter Estimation Problems
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the use of likelihood-free estimators and optimal design techniques for Bayesian adaptive calibration problems.
- The authors develop a mathematical framework for optimal experimental design and demonstrate its application to various examples, including parameter estimation for nonlinear dynamical systems.
- The research aims to address the challenges of traditional parameter estimation methods, such as the need for an analytical likelihood function, by leveraging likelihood-free techniques and optimal design principles.
Plain English Explanation
The paper focuses on a problem known as Bayesian adaptive calibration, which involves estimating the parameters of a mathematical model based on experimental data. This is a common challenge in fields like engineering, physics, and biology, where researchers need to fine-tune the parameters of a model to accurately describe a real-world system.
The traditional approach to this problem often requires an analytical expression for the likelihood function, which can be difficult to obtain, especially for complex, nonlinear systems. To overcome this limitation, the researchers in this paper explore the use of likelihood-free estimators, which can estimate model parameters without the need for an analytical likelihood function.
In addition, the paper introduces a framework for optimal experimental design, which helps researchers determine the best set of experiments to perform in order to obtain the most informative data for parameter estimation. This is important because running experiments can be time-consuming and expensive, so it's crucial to design them in a way that maximizes the information gained.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach through several examples, including estimating the parameters of a nonlinear dynamical system. By combining likelihood-free estimators and optimal design techniques, they show that it's possible to accurately estimate model parameters without relying on analytical likelihood functions.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by providing a mathematical background for optimal experimental design, which involves formulating the parameter estimation problem as an optimization problem. The authors introduce the concept of an information matrix, which quantifies the amount of information that can be extracted from a set of experiments.
The paper then explores the use of likelihood-free estimators for Bayesian adaptive calibration, which can estimate model parameters without the need for an analytical likelihood function. This is particularly useful for complex, nonlinear systems where the likelihood function may be difficult to derive.
The authors develop a framework for integrating likelihood-free estimators with optimal design techniques, allowing them to determine the best set of experiments to perform in order to obtain the most informative data for parameter estimation. This involves an iterative process of running experiments, updating the parameter estimates, and designing the next set of experiments based on the previous results.
The paper presents several examples, including estimating the parameters of a nonlinear dynamical system and comparing traditional and deep learning-based parameter estimation methods. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach, which can accurately estimate model parameters without relying on analytical likelihood functions.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive and rigorous framework for Bayesian adaptive calibration using likelihood-free estimators and optimal design techniques. The authors have carefully addressed the limitations of traditional parameter estimation methods and have developed a robust approach that can be applied to a wide range of problems.
One potential limitation of the research is the computational complexity involved in the iterative process of running experiments, updating parameter estimates, and designing the next set of experiments. This may be a concern for real-world applications where time and resources are limited.
Additionally, the paper does not discuss the sensitivity of the proposed approach to model misspecification or the presence of systematic errors in the experimental data. It would be interesting to see how the method performs in the face of such challenges, which are common in practical applications.
Despite these minor concerns, the research presented in this paper represents a significant contribution to the field of Bayesian adaptive calibration and optimal experimental design. The authors have demonstrated the potential of likelihood-free estimators and optimal design techniques to tackle complex parameter estimation problems, and their work paves the way for further advancements in this area.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a novel framework for Bayesian adaptive calibration that leverages likelihood-free estimators and optimal design techniques. By addressing the limitations of traditional parameter estimation methods, the authors have developed a robust approach that can accurately estimate model parameters without relying on analytical likelihood functions.
The research has important implications for a wide range of fields, from engineering and physics to biology and ecology, where accurate parameter estimation is crucial for understanding complex systems. The integration of likelihood-free estimators and optimal design principles represents a significant step forward in the field of Bayesian adaptive calibration, and the examples provided in the paper demonstrate the versatility and effectiveness of the proposed approach.
As the complexity of mathematical models continues to grow, the need for efficient and reliable parameter estimation methods will only increase. The work presented in this paper offers a promising solution to this challenge and should inspire further research in this area.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Deep Optimal Experimental Design for Parameter Estimation Problems
Md Shahriar Rahim Siddiqui, Arman Rahmim, Eldad Haber
Optimal experimental design is a well studied field in applied science and engineering. Techniques for estimating such a design are commonly used within the framework of parameter estimation. Nonetheless, in recent years parameter estimation techniques are changing rapidly with the introduction of deep learning techniques to replace traditional estimation methods. This in turn requires the adaptation of optimal experimental design that is associated with these new techniques. In this paper we investigate a new experimental design methodology that uses deep learning. We show that the training of a network as a Likelihood Free Estimator can be used to significantly simplify the design process and circumvent the need for the computationally expensive bi-level optimization problem that is inherent in optimal experimental design for non-linear systems. Furthermore, deep design improves the quality of the recovery process for parameter estimation problems. As proof of concept we apply our methodology to two different systems of Ordinary Differential Equations.
Read more6/26/2024
🏷️
0
Bayesian Adaptive Calibration and Optimal Design
Rafael Oliveira, Dino Sejdinovic, David Howard, Edwin Bonilla
The process of calibrating computer models of natural phenomena is essential for applications in the physical sciences, where plenty of domain knowledge can be embedded into simulations and then calibrated against real observations. Current machine learning approaches, however, mostly rely on rerunning simulations over a fixed set of designs available in the observed data, potentially neglecting informative correlations across the design space and requiring a large amount of simulations. Instead, we consider the calibration process from the perspective of Bayesian adaptive experimental design and propose a data-efficient algorithm to run maximally informative simulations within a batch-sequential process. At each round, the algorithm jointly estimates the parameters of the posterior distribution and optimal designs by maximising a variational lower bound of the expected information gain. The simulator is modelled as a sample from a Gaussian process, which allows us to correlate simulations and observed data with the unknown calibration parameters. We show the benefits of our method when compared to related approaches across synthetic and real-data problems.
Read more5/24/2024
↗️
0
Optimal design of experiments in the context of machine-learning inter-atomic potentials: improving the efficiency and transferability of kernel based methods
Bartosz Barzdajn, Christopher P. Race
Data-driven, machine learning (ML) models of atomistic interactions are often based on flexible and non-physical functions that can relate nuanced aspects of atomic arrangements into predictions of energies and forces. As a result, these potentials are as good as the training data (usually results of so-called ab initio simulations) and we need to make sure that we have enough information for a model to become sufficiently accurate, reliable and transferable. The main challenge stems from the fact that descriptors of chemical environments are often sparse high-dimensional objects without a well-defined continuous metric. Therefore, it is rather unlikely that any ad hoc method of choosing training examples will be indiscriminate, and it will be easy to fall into the trap of confirmation bias, where the same narrow and biased sampling is used to generate train- and test- sets. We will demonstrate that classical concepts of statistical planning of experiments and optimal design can help to mitigate such problems at a relatively low computational cost. The key feature of the method we will investigate is that they allow us to assess the informativeness of data (how much we can improve the model by adding/swapping a training example) and verify if the training is feasible with the current set before obtaining any reference energies and forces -- a so-called off-line approach. In other words, we are focusing on an approach that is easy to implement and doesn't require sophisticated frameworks that involve automated access to high-performance computational (HPC).
Read more5/15/2024
0
Real-time optimal control of high-dimensional parametrized systems by deep learning-based reduced order models
Matteo Tomasetto, Andrea Manzoni, Francesco Braghin
Steering a system towards a desired target in a very short amount of time is challenging from a computational standpoint. Indeed, the intrinsically iterative nature of optimal control problems requires multiple simulations of the physical system to be controlled. Moreover, the control action needs to be updated whenever the underlying scenario undergoes variations. Full-order models based on, e.g., the Finite Element Method, do not meet these requirements due to the computational burden they usually entail. On the other hand, conventional reduced order modeling techniques such as the Reduced Basis method, are intrusive, rely on a linear superimposition of modes, and lack of efficiency when addressing nonlinear time-dependent dynamics. In this work, we propose a non-intrusive Deep Learning-based Reduced Order Modeling (DL-ROM) technique for the rapid control of systems described in terms of parametrized PDEs in multiple scenarios. In particular, optimal full-order snapshots are generated and properly reduced by either Proper Orthogonal Decomposition or deep autoencoders (or a combination thereof) while feedforward neural networks are exploited to learn the map from scenario parameters to reduced optimal solutions. Nonlinear dimensionality reduction therefore allows us to consider state variables and control actions that are both low-dimensional and distributed. After (i) data generation, (ii) dimensionality reduction, and (iii) neural networks training in the offline phase, optimal control strategies can be rapidly retrieved in an online phase for any scenario of interest. The computational speedup and the high accuracy obtained with the proposed approach are assessed on different PDE-constrained optimization problems, ranging from the minimization of energy dissipation in incompressible flows modelled through Navier-Stokes equations to the thermal active cooling in heat transfer.
Read more9/10/2024