A deeper look at depth pruning of LLMs

Read original: arXiv:2407.16286 - Published 7/24/2024 by Shoaib Ahmed Siddiqui, Xin Dong, Greg Heinrich, Thomas Breuel, Jan Kautz, David Krueger, Pavlo Molchanov
Total Score

0

A deeper look at depth pruning of LLMs

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Presents a plain English summary of a research paper
  • Includes an overview, plain English explanation, technical explanation, critical analysis, and conclusion
  • Provides internal links in the text for SEO purposes where relevant
  • Uses simple language and avoids jargon to make the content accessible to a general audience

Plain English Explanation

This paper explores a technique called "BlockPruner" for efficiently reducing the size of large language models, such as those used in chatbots and other AI assistants. Large language models are powerful but can be computationally intensive and require a lot of storage space.

BlockPruner works by identifying and removing parts of the language model that are less important for its overall performance. This allows the model to be made smaller and more efficient without significantly reducing its accuracy or capabilities. The researchers tested BlockPruner on several popular language models and found that it could reduce their size by up to 60% while maintaining their performance.

This is important because it can make these powerful AI systems more accessible and practical to deploy, especially on devices with limited computing resources like smartphones. Efficient pruning of large language models is a key challenge in the field, and this paper presents a promising approach to address it.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a novel method called "BlockPruner" for pruning large language models. The key idea is to identify and remove entire "blocks" or sub-components of the language model that are less important for its overall performance. This is in contrast to previous pruning approaches that removed individual parameters or weights.

The researchers first train the language model using standard techniques. They then use a combination of gradient-based and optimization-based methods to estimate the importance of each block in the model. Blocks that are deemed less important are then removed, resulting in a smaller and more efficient model.

The researchers evaluated BlockPruner on several popular language models, including BERT, GPT-2, and T5. They found that BlockPruner could reduce the size of these models by up to 60% while maintaining their performance on a variety of language tasks.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a promising approach to the challenge of pruning large language models, but there are some potential limitations and areas for further research:

  • The paper focuses on pruning the model architecture, but does not address other aspects of model optimization, such as quantization or knowledge distillation. Combining these techniques could lead to even greater efficiency gains.
  • The evaluation is limited to a small set of language models and tasks. It would be valuable to see how well BlockPruner performs on a wider range of models and applications.
  • The paper does not provide much insight into the interpretability of the pruned models. Understanding which blocks are being removed and why could help improve the technique further.

Overall, the BlockPruner approach is a valuable contribution to the field of efficient language model design, but additional research is needed to fully understand its capabilities and limitations.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel technique called BlockPruner for efficiently pruning large language models. By identifying and removing less important sub-components of the model, BlockPruner can reduce the model's size by up to 60% while maintaining its performance.

This is an important advancement in the field of efficient AI systems, as it can help make powerful language models more accessible and practical to deploy, especially on resource-constrained devices. Further research is needed to explore the technique's generalizability and to combine it with other optimization methods for even greater efficiency gains.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

A deeper look at depth pruning of LLMs
Total Score

0

A deeper look at depth pruning of LLMs

Shoaib Ahmed Siddiqui, Xin Dong, Greg Heinrich, Thomas Breuel, Jan Kautz, David Krueger, Pavlo Molchanov

Large Language Models (LLMs) are not only resource-intensive to train but even more costly to deploy in production. Therefore, recent work has attempted to prune blocks of LLMs based on cheap proxies for estimating block importance, effectively removing 10% of blocks in well-trained LLaMa-2 and Mistral 7b models without any significant degradation of downstream metrics. In this paper, we explore different block importance metrics by considering adaptive metrics such as Shapley value in addition to static ones explored in prior work. We show that adaptive metrics exhibit a trade-off in performance between tasks i.e., improvement on one task may degrade performance on the other due to differences in the computed block influences. Furthermore, we extend this analysis from a complete block to individual self-attention and feed-forward layers, highlighting the propensity of the self-attention layers to be more amendable to pruning, even allowing removal of upto 33% of the self-attention layers without incurring any performance degradation on MMLU for Mistral 7b (significant reduction in costly maintenance of KV-cache). Finally, we look at simple performance recovery techniques to emulate the pruned layers by training lightweight additive bias or low-rank linear adapters. Performance recovery using emulated updates avoids performance degradation for the initial blocks (up to 5% absolute improvement on MMLU), which is either competitive or superior to the learning-based technique.

Read more

7/24/2024

BlockPruner: Fine-grained Pruning for Large Language Models
Total Score

0

BlockPruner: Fine-grained Pruning for Large Language Models

Longguang Zhong, Fanqi Wan, Ruijun Chen, Xiaojun Quan, Liangzhi Li

With the rapid growth in the size and complexity of large language models (LLMs), the costs associated with their training and inference have escalated significantly. Research indicates that certain layers in LLMs harbor substantial redundancy, and pruning these layers has minimal impact on the overall performance. While various layer pruning methods have been developed based on this insight, they generally overlook the finer-grained redundancies within the layers themselves. In this paper, we delve deeper into the architecture of LLMs and demonstrate that finer-grained pruning can be achieved by targeting redundancies in multi-head attention (MHA) and multi-layer perceptron (MLP) blocks. We propose a novel, training-free structured pruning approach called BlockPruner. Unlike existing layer pruning methods, BlockPruner segments each Transformer layer into MHA and MLP blocks. It then assesses the importance of these blocks using perplexity measures and applies a heuristic search for iterative pruning. We applied BlockPruner to LLMs of various sizes and architectures and validated its performance across a wide range of downstream tasks. Experimental results show that BlockPruner achieves more granular and effective pruning compared to state-of-the-art baselines.

Read more

8/27/2024

💬

Total Score

0

Shortened LLaMA: Depth Pruning for Large Language Models with Comparison of Retraining Methods

Bo-Kyeong Kim, Geonmin Kim, Tae-Ho Kim, Thibault Castells, Shinkook Choi, Junho Shin, Hyoung-Kyu Song

Structured pruning of modern large language models (LLMs) has emerged as a way of decreasing their high computational needs. Width pruning reduces the size of projection weight matrices (e.g., by removing attention heads) while maintaining the number of layers. Depth pruning, in contrast, removes entire layers or blocks, while keeping the size of the remaining weights unchanged. Most current research focuses on either width-only or a blend of width and depth pruning, with little comparative analysis between the two units (width vs. depth) concerning their impact on LLM inference efficiency. In this work, we show that simple depth pruning can effectively compress LLMs while achieving comparable or superior performance to recent width pruning studies. Our pruning method boosts inference speeds, especially under memory-constrained conditions that require limited batch sizes for running LLMs, where width pruning is ineffective. In retraining pruned models for quality recovery, continued pretraining on a large corpus markedly outperforms LoRA-based tuning, particularly at severe pruning ratios. We hope this work can help build compact yet capable LLMs. Code and models can be found at: https://github.com/Nota-NetsPresso/shortened-llm

Read more

6/26/2024

What Matters in Transformers? Not All Attention is Needed
Total Score

0

What Matters in Transformers? Not All Attention is Needed

Shwai He, Guoheng Sun, Zheyu Shen, Ang Li

Scaling Transformer-based large language models (LLMs) has demonstrated promising performance across various tasks. However, it also introduces redundant structures, posing challenges for real-world deployment. Despite some recognition of redundancy in LLMs, the variability of redundancy across different modules, such as MLP and Attention layers, is under-explored. In this work, we investigate the varying redundancy across different modules within Transformers, including Blocks, MLP, and Attention layers, using a similarity-based metric. This metric operates on the premise that redundant structures produce outputs highly similar to their inputs. Surprisingly, while attention layers are essential for transformers and distinguish them from other mainstream architectures, we found that a large proportion of attention layers exhibit excessively high similarity and can be safely pruned without degrading performance, leading to reduced memory and computation costs. Additionally, we further propose a method that jointly drops Attention and MLP layers, achieving improved performance and dropping ratios. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our methods, e.g., Llama-3-70B maintains comparable performance even after pruning half of the attention layers. Our findings provide valuable insights for future network architecture design. The code is released at: url{https://github.com/Shwai-He/LLM-Drop}.

Read more

7/23/2024