Defending Against Alignment-Breaking Attacks via Robustly Aligned LLM

Read original: arXiv:2309.14348 - Published 6/13/2024 by Bochuan Cao, Yuanpu Cao, Lu Lin, Jinghui Chen
Total Score

1

👀

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Large Language Models (LLMs) have made significant advancements, but there are concerns about their potential misuse to generate harmful or malicious content.
  • While research has focused on aligning LLMs with human values, these alignments can be bypassed through adversarial optimization or handcrafted jailbreaking prompts.
  • This work introduces a Robustly Aligned LLM (RA-LLM) to defend against such alignment-breaking attacks.

Plain English Explanation

Large language models (LLMs) are a type of artificial intelligence that can generate human-like text. These models have become very advanced in recent years and are now used in many different applications. However, there is a growing concern that these models could be misused to create harmful or inappropriate content.

Researchers have tried to address this problem by trying to "align" the LLMs with human values and ethics, so they won't produce problematic content. But these alignments can sometimes be bypassed or broken, for example, by using specially crafted prompts that trick the model into generating harmful text.

To defend against these "alignment-breaking" attacks, the researchers in this paper have developed a new type of LLM called a Robustly Aligned LLM (RA-LLM). The RA-LLM is built on top of an existing aligned LLM, and it has an additional "alignment checking" function that helps prevent it from being tricked by adversarial prompts. This means the RA-LLM is more resistant to attacks that try to bypass its ethical alignment.

The researchers have tested the RA-LLM on real-world LLM models and found that it can successfully defend against both state-of-the-art adversarial prompts and popular jailbreaking prompts, reducing their attack success rates from nearly 100% down to around 10% or less.

Technical Explanation

The researchers start by noting the rapid advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) and the growing concerns about their potential misuse. While previous work has focused on aligning LLMs with human values to prevent inappropriate content, these alignments can be bypassed through adversarial optimization or handcrafted jailbreaking prompts.

To address this, the researchers introduce a Robustly Aligned LLM (RA-LLM) that can be directly constructed upon an existing aligned LLM. The RA-LLM includes a robust alignment checking function that can defend against alignment-breaking attacks without requiring expensive retraining or fine-tuning of the original LLM.

The researchers provide a theoretical analysis to verify the effectiveness of the RA-LLM in defending against alignment-breaking attacks. Through real-world experiments on open-source LLMs, they demonstrate that the RA-LLM can successfully defend against both state-of-the-art adversarial prompts and popular handcrafted jailbreaking prompts, reducing their attack success rates from nearly 100% to around 10% or less.

Critical Analysis

The researchers acknowledge that while the RA-LLM provides a promising defense against alignment-breaking attacks, there may still be limitations and areas for further research. For example, the paper does not address the potential for more sophisticated or previously unseen types of alignment-breaking prompts that could bypass the RA-LLM's defenses.

Additionally, the RA-LLM's reliance on an existing aligned LLM raises questions about the robustness and reliability of the underlying alignment, which could still be vulnerable to other types of attacks or failures. Further research may be needed to robustify the safety-aligned LLMs themselves to provide a more comprehensive defense against malicious use.

Overall, the RA-LLM represents an important step forward in protecting LLMs from alignment-breaking attacks, but continued research and development will be necessary to fully address the complex challenges of ensuring the safe and responsible use of these powerful language models.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a Robustly Aligned Large Language Model (RA-LLM) that can effectively defend against alignment-breaking attacks, where adversarial prompts or handcrafted jailbreaking techniques are used to bypass the ethical alignment of the language model. The RA-LLM builds upon an existing aligned LLM and adds a robust alignment checking function, without requiring expensive retraining or fine-tuning.

Through both theoretical analysis and real-world experiments, the researchers demonstrate the RA-LLM's ability to significantly reduce the success rates of these alignment-breaking attacks, from nearly 100% down to around 10% or less. This represents an important advancement in the ongoing efforts to ensure the safe and responsible development and deployment of large language models, which have become increasingly ubiquitous across various applications and domains.

While the RA-LLM is a promising step forward, continued research will be needed to address the evolving landscape of potential attacks and further strengthen the robustness and reliability of safety-aligned language models. By proactively addressing these challenges, the research community can help unlock the full potential of large language models while mitigating their risks and ensuring they are aligned with human values and ethics.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

👀

Total Score

1

Defending Against Alignment-Breaking Attacks via Robustly Aligned LLM

Bochuan Cao, Yuanpu Cao, Lu Lin, Jinghui Chen

Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) have made significant advancements and are now widely used across various domains. Unfortunately, there has been a rising concern that LLMs can be misused to generate harmful or malicious content. Though a line of research has focused on aligning LLMs with human values and preventing them from producing inappropriate content, such alignments are usually vulnerable and can be bypassed by alignment-breaking attacks via adversarially optimized or handcrafted jailbreaking prompts. In this work, we introduce a Robustly Aligned LLM (RA-LLM) to defend against potential alignment-breaking attacks. RA-LLM can be directly constructed upon an existing aligned LLM with a robust alignment checking function, without requiring any expensive retraining or fine-tuning process of the original LLM. Furthermore, we also provide a theoretical analysis for RA-LLM to verify its effectiveness in defending against alignment-breaking attacks. Through real-world experiments on open-source large language models, we demonstrate that RA-LLM can successfully defend against both state-of-the-art adversarial prompts and popular handcrafted jailbreaking prompts by reducing their attack success rates from nearly 100% to around 10% or less.

Read more

6/13/2024

💬

Total Score

0

SmoothLLM: Defending Large Language Models Against Jailbreaking Attacks

Alexander Robey, Eric Wong, Hamed Hassani, George J. Pappas

Despite efforts to align large language models (LLMs) with human intentions, widely-used LLMs such as GPT, Llama, and Claude are susceptible to jailbreaking attacks, wherein an adversary fools a targeted LLM into generating objectionable content. To address this vulnerability, we propose SmoothLLM, the first algorithm designed to mitigate jailbreaking attacks. Based on our finding that adversarially-generated prompts are brittle to character-level changes, our defense randomly perturbs multiple copies of a given input prompt, and then aggregates the corresponding predictions to detect adversarial inputs. Across a range of popular LLMs, SmoothLLM sets the state-of-the-art for robustness against the GCG, PAIR, RandomSearch, and AmpleGCG jailbreaks. SmoothLLM is also resistant against adaptive GCG attacks, exhibits a small, though non-negligible trade-off between robustness and nominal performance, and is compatible with any LLM. Our code is publicly available at url{https://github.com/arobey1/smooth-llm}.

Read more

6/17/2024

Mission Impossible: A Statistical Perspective on Jailbreaking LLMs
Total Score

0

Mission Impossible: A Statistical Perspective on Jailbreaking LLMs

Jingtong Su, Julia Kempe, Karen Ullrich

Large language models (LLMs) are trained on a deluge of text data with limited quality control. As a result, LLMs can exhibit unintended or even harmful behaviours, such as leaking information, fake news or hate speech. Countermeasures, commonly referred to as preference alignment, include fine-tuning the pretrained LLMs with carefully crafted text examples of desired behaviour. Even then, empirical evidence shows preference aligned LLMs can be enticed to harmful behaviour. This so called jailbreaking of LLMs is typically achieved by adversarially modifying the input prompt to the LLM. Our paper provides theoretical insights into the phenomenon of preference alignment and jailbreaking from a statistical perspective. Under our framework, we first show that pretrained LLMs will mimic harmful behaviour if present in the training corpus. Under that same framework, we then introduce a statistical notion of alignment, and lower-bound the jailbreaking probability, showing that it is unpreventable under reasonable assumptions. Based on our insights, we propose an alteration to the currently prevalent alignment strategy RLHF. Specifically, we introduce a simple modification to the RLHF objective, we call E-RLHF, that aims to increase the likelihood of safe responses. E-RLHF brings no additional training cost, and is compatible with other methods. Empirically, we demonstrate that E-RLHF outperforms RLHF on all alignment problems put forward by the AdvBench and HarmBench project without sacrificing model performance as measured by the MT-Bench project.

Read more

8/6/2024

Characterizing and Evaluating the Reliability of LLMs against Jailbreak Attacks
Total Score

0

Characterizing and Evaluating the Reliability of LLMs against Jailbreak Attacks

Kexin Chen, Yi Liu, Dongxia Wang, Jiaying Chen, Wenhai Wang

Large Language Models (LLMs) have increasingly become pivotal in content generation with notable societal impact. These models hold the potential to generate content that could be deemed harmful.Efforts to mitigate this risk include implementing safeguards to ensure LLMs adhere to social ethics.However, despite such measures, the phenomenon of jailbreaking -- where carefully crafted prompts elicit harmful responses from models -- persists as a significant challenge. Recognizing the continuous threat posed by jailbreaking tactics and their repercussions for the trustworthy use of LLMs, a rigorous assessment of the models' robustness against such attacks is essential. This study introduces an comprehensive evaluation framework and conducts an large-scale empirical experiment to address this need. We concentrate on 10 cutting-edge jailbreak strategies across three categories, 1525 questions from 61 specific harmful categories, and 13 popular LLMs. We adopt multi-dimensional metrics such as Attack Success Rate (ASR), Toxicity Score, Fluency, Token Length, and Grammatical Errors to thoroughly assess the LLMs' outputs under jailbreak. By normalizing and aggregating these metrics, we present a detailed reliability score for different LLMs, coupled with strategic recommendations to reduce their susceptibility to such vulnerabilities. Additionally, we explore the relationships among the models, attack strategies, and types of harmful content, as well as the correlations between the evaluation metrics, which proves the validity of our multifaceted evaluation framework. Our extensive experimental results demonstrate a lack of resilience among all tested LLMs against certain strategies, and highlight the need to concentrate on the reliability facets of LLMs. We believe our study can provide valuable insights into enhancing the security evaluation of LLMs against jailbreak within the domain.

Read more

8/20/2024