Defining Problem from Solutions: Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL) and Its Applications for Next-Generation Networking

2404.01583

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 4/3/2024 by Yinqiu Liu, Ruichen Zhang, Hongyang Du, Dusit Niyato, Jiawen Kang, Zehui Xiong, Dong In Kim
Defining Problem from Solutions: Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL) and Its Applications for Next-Generation Networking

Abstract

Performance optimization is a critical concern in networking, on which Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) has achieved great success. Nonetheless, DRL training relies on precisely defined reward functions, which formulate the optimization objective and indicate the positive/negative progress towards the optimal. With the ever-increasing environmental complexity and human participation in Next-Generation Networking (NGN), defining appropriate reward functions become challenging. In this article, we explore the applications of Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL) in NGN. Particularly, if DRL aims to find optimal solutions to the problem, IRL finds a problem from the optimal solutions, where the optimal solutions are collected from experts, and the problem is defined by reward inference. Specifically, we first formally introduce the IRL technique, including its fundamentals, workflow, and difference from DRL. Afterward, we present the motivations of IRL applications in NGN and survey existing studies. Furthermore, to demonstrate the process of applying IRL in NGN, we perform a case study about human-centric prompt engineering in Generative AI-enabled networks. We demonstrate the effectiveness of using both DRL and IRL techniques and prove the superiority of IRL.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL) is a technique for learning reward functions from observed behavior.
  • IRL can be applied to next-generation networking (NGN) to understand and optimize network protocols and policies.
  • The paper explores the fundamentals of IRL and its potential applications for NGN, including areas like reward engineering and deep reinforcement learning.

Plain English Explanation

Inverse Reinforcement Learning, or IRL, is a way for machine learning systems to figure out what goals or rewards are driving certain behaviors, just by watching those behaviors. Instead of being told the goal upfront, the system tries to reverse-engineer the goal from the observed actions.

This is useful for next-generation networking, where we want network systems to be able to adapt and optimize themselves, without always having a clear pre-defined objective. By using IRL, we can observe how humans or other intelligent agents interact with and manage network systems, and then have AI systems learn to mimic that behavior and decision-making process.

For example, say we want a network to automatically adjust its bandwidth allocation and routing based on real-time user needs. Rather than trying to explicitly program all the rules for how that should work, we could use IRL to watch how network administrators or end users make those decisions, and then train an AI system to replicate that. The AI would learn the implicit goals and priorities that guide good network management, without requiring detailed manual programming.

IRL opens up possibilities for more flexible, adaptive, and human-aligned network control systems, powered by deep reinforcement learning and other advanced AI techniques. But there are also challenges to overcome, like ensuring the learned behaviors are robust and aligned with higher-level objectives. The paper dives into these technical details and considerations.

Technical Explanation

The paper provides an overview of the fundamentals of Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL) and its potential applications for Next-Generation Networking (NGN). IRL is a technique for learning reward functions from observed behavior, which can be useful for understanding and optimizing complex systems like communication networks.

The key idea behind IRL is to infer the underlying objectives or rewards that are driving an agent's observed actions, rather than being given the reward function directly. This allows the system to learn behavioral strategies that are aligned with the true objectives, even if those objectives are not fully specified upfront.

The paper discusses how IRL can be applied to NGN in areas like reward engineering and deep reinforcement learning (DRL). Reward engineering involves designing appropriate reward functions to shape the desired network behavior, which can be challenging. IRL provides a data-driven approach to infer these reward functions from example behaviors.

Additionally, the paper explores how IRL can be combined with DRL to enable more flexible, adaptive network control policies. By learning the implicit objectives behind network management decisions, DRL agents can learn to optimize network performance and resource allocation in an intelligent, context-aware manner.

The paper also touches on some of the challenges and open research questions around applying IRL to NGN, such as ensuring the learned behaviors are robust, scalable, and aligned with high-level network objectives. Potential solution directions are discussed, including hierarchical IRL and multi-agent IRL frameworks.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a compelling overview of how Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL) can be a powerful tool for advancing next-generation networking (NGN) capabilities. The key strength is in highlighting IRL's ability to learn complex, context-dependent objectives directly from observed behaviors, rather than relying on manually specified reward functions.

However, the paper also acknowledges some of the challenges in applying IRL to real-world NGN scenarios. Issues around scalability, robustness, and alignment with high-level goals will need to be carefully addressed. The authors rightly point to directions like hierarchical IRL and multi-agent frameworks as promising avenues for further research.

Additionally, the paper could have delved deeper into potential pitfalls and limitations of IRL in the NGN domain. For instance, the fidelity and representativeness of the training data used for IRL will be crucial - biased or incomplete observations could lead to suboptimal learned behaviors. The paper could have discussed strategies for mitigating such data issues.

Overall, the paper provides a solid foundational understanding of IRL and its applicability to NGN. While the technical details are well-covered, further exploration of the practical challenges and potential failure modes would strengthen the critical analysis. Nonetheless, the work serves as an excellent starting point for researchers and practitioners interested in applying IRL to advance intelligent, adaptive network management.

Conclusion

This paper presents a compelling case for leveraging Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL) to tackle the challenges of next-generation networking (NGN). By allowing AI systems to learn optimal network management strategies directly from observed behaviors, IRL offers a promising path towards more flexible, context-aware, and human-aligned network control policies.

The key insights highlighted in the paper include IRL's ability to infer implicit objectives and reward functions, its synergies with deep reinforcement learning, and the potential for applications in areas like reward engineering. While the technical details are well-covered, the paper also acknowledges the need to address scalability, robustness, and alignment challenges to realize the full potential of IRL in NGN.

Overall, this work serves as an excellent introduction to the fundamental concepts of IRL and its relevance for the evolving field of NGN. As the paper suggests, continued research and innovation in this direction could lead to significant advancements in the way communication networks are designed, deployed, and optimized to meet the demands of the future.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

Bayesian Inverse Reinforcement Learning for Non-Markovian Rewards

Bayesian Inverse Reinforcement Learning for Non-Markovian Rewards

Noah Topper, Alvaro Velasquez, George Atia

YC

0

Reddit

0

Inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) is the problem of inferring a reward function from expert behavior. There are several approaches to IRL, but most are designed to learn a Markovian reward. However, a reward function might be non-Markovian, depending on more than just the current state, such as a reward machine (RM). Although there has been recent work on inferring RMs, it assumes access to the reward signal, absent in IRL. We propose a Bayesian IRL (BIRL) framework for inferring RMs directly from expert behavior, requiring significant changes to the standard framework. We define a new reward space, adapt the expert demonstration to include history, show how to compute the reward posterior, and propose a novel modification to simulated annealing to maximize this posterior. We demonstrate that our method performs well when optimizing according to its inferred reward and compares favorably to an existing method that learns exclusively binary non-Markovian rewards.

Read more

6/21/2024

👁️

Offline Inverse RL: New Solution Concepts and Provably Efficient Algorithms

Filippo Lazzati, Mirco Mutti, Alberto Maria Metelli

YC

0

Reddit

0

Inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) aims to recover the reward function of an expert agent from demonstrations of behavior. It is well-known that the IRL problem is fundamentally ill-posed, i.e., many reward functions can explain the demonstrations. For this reason, IRL has been recently reframed in terms of estimating the feasible reward set (Metelli et al., 2021), thus, postponing the selection of a single reward. However, so far, the available formulations and algorithmic solutions have been proposed and analyzed mainly for the online setting, where the learner can interact with the environment and query the expert at will. This is clearly unrealistic in most practical applications, where the availability of an offline dataset is a much more common scenario. In this paper, we introduce a novel notion of feasible reward set capturing the opportunities and limitations of the offline setting and we analyze the complexity of its estimation. This requires the introduction an original learning framework that copes with the intrinsic difficulty of the setting, for which the data coverage is not under control. Then, we propose two computationally and statistically efficient algorithms, IRLO and PIRLO, for addressing the problem. In particular, the latter adopts a specific form of pessimism to enforce the novel desirable property of inclusion monotonicity of the delivered feasible set. With this work, we aim to provide a panorama of the challenges of the offline IRL problem and how they can be fruitfully addressed.

Read more

6/7/2024

Towards the Transferability of Rewards Recovered via Regularized Inverse Reinforcement Learning

Towards the Transferability of Rewards Recovered via Regularized Inverse Reinforcement Learning

Andreas Schlaginhaufen, Maryam Kamgarpour

YC

0

Reddit

0

Inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) aims to infer a reward from expert demonstrations, motivated by the idea that the reward, rather than the policy, is the most succinct and transferable description of a task [Ng et al., 2000]. However, the reward corresponding to an optimal policy is not unique, making it unclear if an IRL-learned reward is transferable to new transition laws in the sense that its optimal policy aligns with the optimal policy corresponding to the expert's true reward. Past work has addressed this problem only under the assumption of full access to the expert's policy, guaranteeing transferability when learning from two experts with the same reward but different transition laws that satisfy a specific rank condition [Rolland et al., 2022]. In this work, we show that the conditions developed under full access to the expert's policy cannot guarantee transferability in the more practical scenario where we have access only to demonstrations of the expert. Instead of a binary rank condition, we propose principal angles as a more refined measure of similarity and dissimilarity between transition laws. Based on this, we then establish two key results: 1) a sufficient condition for transferability to any transition laws when learning from at least two experts with sufficiently different transition laws, and 2) a sufficient condition for transferability to local changes in the transition law when learning from a single expert. Furthermore, we also provide a probably approximately correct (PAC) algorithm and an end-to-end analysis for learning transferable rewards from demonstrations of multiple experts.

Read more

6/5/2024

🐍

A Unified Linear Programming Framework for Offline Reward Learning from Human Demonstrations and Feedback

Kihyun Kim, Jiawei Zhang, Asuman Ozdaglar, Pablo A. Parrilo

YC

0

Reddit

0

Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL) and Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) are pivotal methodologies in reward learning, which involve inferring and shaping the underlying reward function of sequential decision-making problems based on observed human demonstrations and feedback. Most prior work in reward learning has relied on prior knowledge or assumptions about decision or preference models, potentially leading to robustness issues. In response, this paper introduces a novel linear programming (LP) framework tailored for offline reward learning. Utilizing pre-collected trajectories without online exploration, this framework estimates a feasible reward set from the primal-dual optimality conditions of a suitably designed LP, and offers an optimality guarantee with provable sample efficiency. Our LP framework also enables aligning the reward functions with human feedback, such as pairwise trajectory comparison data, while maintaining computational tractability and sample efficiency. We demonstrate that our framework potentially achieves better performance compared to the conventional maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) approach through analytical examples and numerical experiments.

Read more

6/5/2024