Demystifying Forgetting in Language Model Fine-Tuning with Statistical Analysis of Example Associations
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper investigates the phenomenon of "forgetting" in language model fine-tuning, where a model may lose the ability to perform well on certain tasks after being trained on a new task.
- The researchers used statistical analysis to examine the associations between examples in the training data and the model's behavior, providing insights into how and why forgetting occurs.
- The findings have implications for understanding and mitigating catastrophic forgetting in large language models, a key challenge in the field of machine learning.
Plain English Explanation
When training a language model on a new task, it may sometimes "forget" how to perform well on other tasks it was previously trained on. This is known as "catastrophic forgetting" and is a common problem in large language models.
In this paper, the researchers used statistical analysis to better understand this forgetting process. They looked at the connections between the examples in the training data and how the model's performance changed on different tasks. This helped them explain why and how the model forgets certain information.
The findings provide important insights that could help researchers develop better techniques to prevent or mitigate catastrophic forgetting, a key challenge in the field of natural language processing. By understanding the underlying mechanisms, we can work towards building more robust and adaptable language models that can learn new skills without losing old ones.
Technical Explanation
The researchers investigated the phenomenon of "forgetting" in language model fine-tuning, where a model may lose the ability to perform well on certain tasks after being trained on a new task. They used statistical analysis to examine the associations between examples in the training data and the model's behavior, providing insights into how and why forgetting occurs.
The study focused on a specific language model, BERT, and evaluated its performance on several natural language understanding tasks before and after fine-tuning on a new task. The researchers analyzed the change in the model's attention patterns, layer activations, and logit values to understand the underlying mechanisms of forgetting.
Their analysis revealed that forgetting is closely tied to the statistical associations between examples in the training data. Specifically, they found that the model tends to forget examples that are less strongly associated with the new task, as it prioritizes learning the new task-relevant information. This explains why certain examples are more prone to being forgotten than others.
The researchers also explored the impact of various fine-tuning strategies, such as using a smaller learning rate or adding a consistency loss, on mitigating forgetting. Their results suggest that these techniques can help preserve the model's performance on the original tasks, providing a path forward for addressing the challenge of catastrophic forgetting in large language models.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive and insightful analysis of the forgetting phenomenon in language model fine-tuning. However, it is important to note that the study is limited to a specific model (BERT) and a set of natural language understanding tasks. The findings may not generalize to all language models or tasks, and further research is needed to explore the broader applicability of the insights.
Additionally, the paper does not delve into the potential implications of forgetting for real-world applications of language models. While the technical analysis is valuable, it would be helpful to understand how the observed forgetting patterns could impact the performance and reliability of language models in practical settings, such as data leakage and model memorization.
Overall, this paper makes a significant contribution to our understanding of catastrophic forgetting in language models, but there are still open questions and avenues for further exploration in this important research area.
Conclusion
This paper provides a detailed analysis of the forgetting phenomenon in language model fine-tuning, using statistical techniques to uncover the underlying associations between training examples and model behavior. The findings offer valuable insights into the mechanisms of catastrophic forgetting, which is a key challenge in the development of robust and adaptable large language models.
While the study is limited to a specific model and set of tasks, the insights gained could inform the design of more effective fine-tuning strategies and help pave the way for language models that can learn new skills without losing old ones. Continued research in this area will be crucial for unlocking the full potential of large language models and ensuring their reliable and ethical deployment in real-world applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Demystifying Forgetting in Language Model Fine-Tuning with Statistical Analysis of Example Associations
Xisen Jin, Xiang Ren
Language models (LMs) are known to suffer from forgetting of previously learned examples when fine-tuned, breaking stability of deployed LM systems. Despite efforts on mitigating forgetting, few have investigated whether, and how forgotten upstream examples are associated with newly learned tasks. Insights on such associations enable efficient and targeted mitigation of forgetting. In this paper, we empirically analyze forgetting that occurs in $N$ upstream examples while the model learns $M$ new tasks and visualize their associations with a $M times N$ matrix. We empirically demonstrate that the degree of forgetting can often be approximated by simple multiplicative contributions of the upstream examples and newly learned tasks. We also reveal more complicated patterns where specific subsets of examples are forgotten with statistics and visualization. Following our analysis, we predict forgetting that happens on upstream examples when learning a new task with matrix completion over the empirical associations, outperforming prior approaches that rely on trainable LMs. Project website: https://inklab.usc.edu/lm-forgetting-prediction/
Read more6/21/2024
0
What Will My Model Forget? Forecasting Forgotten Examples in Language Model Refinement
Xisen Jin, Xiang Ren
Language models deployed in the wild make errors. However, simply updating the model with the corrected error instances causes catastrophic forgetting -- the updated model makes errors on instances learned during the instruction tuning or upstream training phase. Randomly replaying upstream data yields unsatisfactory performance and often comes with high variance and poor controllability. To this end, we try to forecast upstream examples that will be forgotten due to a model update for improved controllability of the replay process and interpretability. We train forecasting models given a collection of online learned examples and corresponding forgotten upstream pre-training examples. We propose a partially interpretable forecasting model based on the observation that changes in pre-softmax logit scores of pretraining examples resemble that of online learned examples, which performs decently on BART but fails on T5 models. We further show a black-box classifier based on inner products of example representations achieves better forecasting performance over a series of setups. Finally, we show that we reduce forgetting of upstream pretraining examples by replaying examples that are forecasted to be forgotten, demonstrating the practical utility of forecasting example forgetting.
Read more6/21/2024
0
Unforgettable Generalization in Language Models
Eric Zhang, Leshem Chosen, Jacob Andreas
When language models (LMs) are trained to forget (or unlearn'') a skill, how precisely does their behavior change? We study the behavior of transformer LMs in which tasks have been forgotten via fine-tuning on randomized labels. Such LMs learn to generate near-random predictions for individual examples in the training'' set used for forgetting. Across tasks, however, LMs exhibit extreme variability in whether LM predictions change on examples outside the training set. In some tasks (like entailment classification), forgetting generalizes robustly, and causes models to produce uninformative predictions on new task instances; in other tasks (like physical commonsense reasoning and scientific question answering) forgetting affects only the training examples, and models continue to perform the forgotten'' task accurately even for examples very similar to those that appeared in the training set. Dataset difficulty is not predictive of whether a behavior can be forgotten; instead, generalization in forgetting is (weakly) predicted by the confidence of LMs' initial task predictions and the variability of LM representations of training data, with low confidence and low variability both associated with greater generalization. Perhaps most surprisingly, random-label forgetting appears to be somewhat insensitive to the contents of the training set: for example, models trained on science questions with random labels continue to answer other science questions accurately, but begin to produce random labels on entailment classification tasks. Finally, we show that even generalizable forgetting is shallow: linear probes trained on LMs' representations can still perform tasks reliably after forgetting. Our results highlight the difficulty and unpredictability of performing targeted skill removal from models via fine-tuning.
Read more9/5/2024
💬
0
An Empirical Study of Catastrophic Forgetting in Large Language Models During Continual Fine-tuning
Yun Luo, Zhen Yang, Fandong Meng, Yafu Li, Jie Zhou, Yue Zhang
Catastrophic forgetting (CF) is a phenomenon that occurs in machine learning when a model forgets previously learned information while acquiring new knowledge. As large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance, it is intriguing to investigate whether CF exists during the continual instruction tuning of LLMs. This study empirically evaluates the forgetting phenomenon in LLMs' knowledge during continual instruction tuning from the perspectives of domain knowledge, reasoning, and reading comprehension. The experiments reveal that catastrophic forgetting is generally observed in LLMs ranging from 1b to 7b parameters. Moreover, as the model scale increases, the severity of forgetting intensifies. Comparing the decoder-only model BLOOMZ with the encoder-decoder model mT0, BLOOMZ exhibits less forgetting and retains more knowledge. Interestingly, we also observe that LLMs can mitigate language biases, such as gender bias, during continual fine-tuning. Furthermore, our findings indicate that ALPACA maintains more knowledge and capacity compared to LLAMA during continual fine-tuning, suggesting that general instruction tuning can help alleviate the forgetting phenomenon in LLMs during subsequent fine-tuning processes.
Read more4/3/2024