Demystifying Prompts in Language Models via Perplexity Estimation

Overview

• Language models can be prompted to perform a wide range of tasks, but their performance varies significantly depending on the choice of prompt.
• Researchers don't yet fully understand why this prompt-based performance variance occurs or how to select the best prompts.
• This paper analyzes the factors that contribute to this variance and proposes a new hypothesis: the performance of a prompt is linked to the extent to which the model is familiar with the language it contains.

Plain English Explanation

The research suggests that language models - powerful AI systems that can understand and generate human-like text - can be given specific prompts to perform a wide variety of tasks, from answering questions to generating stories. However, the performance of these language models can vary greatly depending on the exact wording of the prompt.

The researchers wanted to understand why this prompt-based performance variance occurs and how to choose the best prompts. Their key finding is that the performance of a prompt is linked to how familiar the language model is with the words and phrases it contains.

Specifically, the researchers found that the lower the "perplexity" (a measure of how surprised or confused the model is by the prompt) of a prompt, the better the language model will perform on the associated task. This suggests that creating prompts using language the model is very familiar with - for example, by paraphrasing and backtranslating a small set of manually-written prompts - can lead to significant improvements in the model's performance.

Technical Explanation

The researchers conducted experiments across a wide range of tasks to test their hypothesis that prompt performance is linked to the model's familiarity with the prompt language. They found that prompts with lower perplexity - meaning the language model is more confident and less confused by the prompt - generally led to better task performance.

Based on this finding, the researchers devised a method for creating high-performing prompts:

1. Expand a small set of manually-written prompts: They used GPT-3 to automatically paraphrase and backtranslate the initial prompts, generating a larger pool of prompt variations.
2. Select the lowest-perplexity prompts: From this expanded set, they chose the prompts that had the lowest perplexity scores, indicating the language model was most familiar and comfortable with that wording.

This approach of leveraging the model's own familiarity with the prompt language led to significant gains in performance across the tested tasks, compared to using the original manually-written prompts.

Critical Analysis

The researchers provide a compelling hypothesis and evidence that the performance of language model prompts is closely tied to the model's familiarity with the prompt wording. This aligns with our general understanding that language models perform best on inputs they are well-trained on.

However, the researchers acknowledge that there may be other factors beyond just perplexity that contribute to prompt performance, such as the inherent difficulty of the task or the model's broader understanding of the task domain. Additionally, the researchers focused on a limited set of tasks and language models, so the generalizability of their findings remains to be fully explored.

Further research could investigate how this prompt optimization approach scales to more diverse tasks and model architectures, as well as whether there are other prompt characteristics (beyond just perplexity) that could be leveraged to improve performance. Additionally, a deeper exploration of the cognitive and representational mechanisms underlying the link between prompt perplexity and task performance could yield valuable insights.

Conclusion

This research offers a promising new direction for improving the performance of language models on a wide variety of tasks through the careful selection and optimization of prompts. By leveraging the model's own familiarity with prompt wording, as measured by perplexity, the researchers demonstrated significant gains in task performance.

These findings have important implications for the practical application of language models, as well as our fundamental understanding of how they work. By shedding light on the factors that influence prompt-based performance, this research brings us closer to unlocking the full potential of these powerful AI systems.