From Human-to-Human to Human-to-Bot Conversations in Software Engineering

Overview

• Software developers interact with both humans and chatbots using natural language
• Conversations with different parties have distinct properties and flow, depending on the developer's goals
• This paper aims to understand the dynamics of conversations involving AI-powered chatbots in software development

Plain English Explanation

As software development has evolved, developers now interact not only with other humans, but also with chatbots powered by artificial intelligence (AI). These conversations can serve different purposes and have unique characteristics depending on the developer's needs and the type of conversational partner.

The researchers in this paper wanted to better understand the dynamics of these AI-powered conversations in the context of software development. They looked at how conversations with humans differ from those with natural language understanding (NLU)-based chatbots and large language model (LLM)-powered chatbots. By identifying the similarities and differences, the researchers aim to help developers set appropriate expectations and better support communication within their teams.

The key finding is that while LLM-based chatbots can enhance productivity and reduce developers' mental load, they cannot fully replace human-to-human conversations due to certain social aspects. Developers should understand these differences to effectively integrate chatbot interactions into their collaborative workflows.

Technical Explanation

The researchers first compiled existing attributes of conversations between humans and NLU-based chatbots, and then adapted them to the software development context. They then extended this comparison to include LLM-powered chatbots based on an observational study.

The analysis revealed both similarities and differences between human-to-human and human-to-bot conversations. For example, both types of conversations can provide task-oriented information and support productivity. However, human-to-human conversations tend to have stronger social elements, such as building rapport and providing emotional support.

When comparing NLU-based and LLM-based chatbots, the researchers found that LLM-powered chatbots can engage in more natural, open-ended conversations and provide richer responses. However, they still lack the nuanced understanding of social cues and context that humans possess.

Critical Analysis

The paper acknowledges that the observations and comparisons are based on a limited observational study, and that further research is needed to validate the findings and explore the implications in greater depth.

One potential limitation is that the study focused on software development scenarios, and the insights may not directly translate to other domains where chatbots are used. Additionally, as language models continue to evolve, the differences between human-to-human and human-to-bot conversations may change over time.

The researchers also note that while LLM-based chatbots can enhance productivity in certain tasks, they should not be seen as a replacement for human-to-human interactions, particularly when it comes to social and emotional aspects of communication. Developers should carefully consider how to best integrate chatbot interactions into their collaborative workflows to support, rather than replace, human-to-human interactions.

Conclusion

This research provides valuable insights into the evolving dynamics of conversations between software developers and AI-powered chatbots. By understanding the similarities and differences between human-to-human and human-to-bot interactions, developers can set appropriate expectations and leverage chatbot capabilities to enhance their collaborative workflows, while maintaining the essential social and emotional aspects of human communication.

As language models continue to advance and become more widely integrated into software development processes, further research will be crucial to ensure that the benefits of these technologies are maximized while the unique value of human-to-human interactions is preserved.